hahah...many 1020 owner sure richfag ar??going places and travelling a lot to capture some amzing pic    

920 user here, datang kacau2. 

any 1020bros can upload 1080p video recordings? gooding eh?

nothing is perfect bro, but fuuu... everywhere everyone including photography pros praise 1020 is the best, but you say on par with samsung and iphone... cant brain it... lulz... seems that OIS, 41MP and HACC are gimmicks then.

The problem you say is on par bro. 41 megapixel almost 5 times more MP and also a bigger and larger sensor.
How can we not say you are a fanboy.. the pictures and videos peaks for themselves but you don't see it.
Like the above guy said...cannot brain it lol

the 1020 is the best video recorder on a smartphone, period. of course you are entitled to your own personal opinion that it is on par with samsung or iphone, eventhough it contradicts the vast majority of opinions of everyone else, especially iphone and samsung users themselves.

anyway, do spend some time to learn using your 1020 properly imaging and video wise, and you will know whats wrong with opinion regarding it. 

Sharper image if you zoom in video mode. It is stunning! Even my L920 can do lossless zoom which no other phones could do! (Note 3 also got but certainly Nokia phones is better in terms of zoom and quality)

I now shoot videos more than taking pictures. Seriously, its great.

I still like the color reproduction on the 808. 

the question is always about how you utilized the megapixels. If you compare at small resolution of course not huge marginal differences.

I have mentioned to many forumers if u view at 8MP and below there not much difference. If you view at 20MP to 41MP thats where the difference is so obvious. The next is when you zoom and cropping thats where you see the difference. Ordinary point and shoot you wont see much difference.

But you notice they keep posting 4R photos so thats where its missing the WOW vector. Just imagine close up at 41MP.

Refer here
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2717955

If I'm not mistaken, for video recording to shine you're supposed to use the Nokia Pro Cam app to do it and the main difference is in the audio capture. Can't quite remember, video isn't something I pay too much attention to.

oh my, take a look at the many comparison vids already out there. but then, whatever rocks your boat lah brother. i surrender, you win!

no i don't. next question?

edit.

you edit so i also edit la, i dont think you can comprehend what i was saying. 

The great quality of the low light still photo is because the 1020 utilizes the OIS to allow more light into sensor. This is only applicable for a single still frame photo. The video is capturing in a continuous frames and there is simply no way to let each frame to capture more light, you will either need a spot light or infra red camera to capture in such condition.

1020 will win iPhone and Samsung with the OIS in video recording, your video is a hell lot more stable.
See how a pro utilizing the 1020 to do video recording:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKkIijzpZqI...player_embedded

I shall move on without showing, when there is time to shoot good quality photos, I will show you.
90% preparation and 10% shooting, this is an inspired word that I shall remember for the rest of my life from Mr.Che Mat who is my lecturer.

Even if I show you, then you will deny stuff again dude and get a warning again.
Previously you have been furious in many threads for no reason. 920 thread and even 1020.
Be bias about Nokia here and if you wanna talk Samsung can go to Samsung thread. Thanks.

I shall tag you once I have some good shots, stay tuned.

Please try to hide the evidence. Page 36, post number 5.



And please stop the trolling. I wonder how many warning level you have reached..
I am perfectly fine with my account. Kindly post you level of warning


About the pictures the guy was saying that I have no images to show and only knows how to talk.
I showed him some of my pictures from my 5D to just show that i'm not just talking. There is yet any photo with a good subject element that I am interest of to take plus all other photos are personal so why should I show here to the internet. So what is wrong with HDR photo? It requires post processing and there is like nothing editted just merging 3 photos with different exposure.. This is basic for those who really knows what HDR is. Of course there is no EXIF when it is already editted bro. 

anyone here with 1020 didnt apply sp? if yes, so far got any scratches on the screen? thinking of removing the Nillkin sp and use without sp...really poke-eyes-poke-nose with the dust collected at the edges