Possible changes for balance test map - 12 August, Read: "None of these changes are final"
|
|
 Aug 21 2013, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Aug 2012 
|
Terran mechs are weak imo and i rarely use them coz they cost more and less effective than bio.
I think Blizzard shud add in goliath as thor is too big and expensive.. then i will use terran mech more often as goliath cost less and effective against air and ground. This post has been edited by firedamage: Aug 21 2013, 01:34 PM |
|
|
Aug 21 2013, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2013, 04:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Aug 2012
|
QUOTE(DuskBin.Marksman @ Aug 21 2013, 03:30 PM) Lol.......I doubt its that way. Most of Protoss arsenal could counter siege tanks / Thor (The backbone of the Mech army) Yup, most of the time i play against protoss player i use MMM..Chargelot takes reduced damage against tanks, Thor not cost efficient against zealots Stalkers can be blinked offensively or defensively Immortal is your anti armour DPS and tanker Mass Colo can break through the tips of siege lines very efficiently Mass Void ray eats armour very quickly Phoenix lift tanks Tempest long range poke u to death while also giving AA AOE vs Vikings Archons also tank hard and do bonus damage to bio (Hellbats) With Hellbat, Chargelot and Blink stalkers are negated a bunch. Blink Stalkers can still pay off by Hit and run tactics. Mech is very difficult to play especially against skytoss on maps with a lot of dead airspace and etc imo.  I wish Thor can be replaced by goliath or add goliath into terran mech..Thor is really expensive and it become an easy target since his size is big. This post has been edited by firedamage: Aug 21 2013, 04:34 PM |
| Change to: |  0.0173sec
 0.75
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:15 PM |
Quote
