developer has reserve a large chunk of money to pay LAD, haha
Pacific Star Section 13, Star Head office moving here
Pacific Star Section 13, Star Head office moving here
|
|
Jun 28 2017, 12:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
developer has reserve a large chunk of money to pay LAD, haha
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 29 2017, 02:43 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2017, 09:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Dec 19 2017, 10:29 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(urb7 @ Dec 18 2017, 09:29 PM) http://disclosure.bursamalaysia.com/FileAc..._GA_ATTACHMENTS what are their intention to restructure at this point of time, get ready to abandon ship?The Proposed Internal Reorganisation is to enable JRB Group: i) to complete the development of the Pacific Star Business Hub and other components in Pacific Star. The Proposed Internal Reorganisation will result in a corporate structure that allows the group to obtain financing from the bank to finish the project. ii) to streamline the structure of its property development and property investment businesses. Following from this exercise, the Pacific Star Business Hub will be transferred out of JIC, a property development company and FPSB will be a property investment and management company with ownership of and interest in the Pacific Star Business Hub. Arising from the Proposed Internal Reorganisation, there is no change in JRB Group’s overall interest and control in Pacific Star (including the Business Hub). New target completion date is 2019, so how many year it has delay, 2 or 3 years? This post has been edited by Nikmon: Dec 19 2017, 10:53 AM |
|
|
Dec 19 2017, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Dec 20 2017, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(HaoYuan @ Dec 20 2017, 01:28 PM) If the parent company do not pay for subsidiary debt, it will affect the parent company goodwill as well, which may cause more than the financial losses as per my point of view. haha, they have announced that they want to close shop already, beside that are you foreigner, since when developer care about their reputation?? they put all the liabilities under one root, mall and pacific star, a making loss subsidiaries how to sustain, need more financing, if no then how... |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 22 2017, 12:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(HaoYuan @ Dec 21 2017, 05:27 PM) Dun be silly. If debt can be default so easy, then all the listed company just create more subsidiary and transfer all the debt into it and make it bankrupt, so no need to repay. If like that most of the bank already bankrupt. seems like you don't understand how corporate work. you need gain more knowledge not base on your comment sense. |
|
|
Jan 22 2018, 12:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(HaoYuan @ Jan 21 2018, 07:59 PM) base on regulation, the group is not liable to subsidiary debt, this not based on what i feel, this is law.check Jaks group announcement, pacific will be their final project, they going to abandon property segment, question is when, whether before or after completion. neither also not good for the property. all are facts, not based on what i think or feel. This post has been edited by Nikmon: Jan 22 2018, 12:24 AM |
|
|
Jan 22 2018, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(yihyang @ Jan 22 2018, 11:57 AM) Base on co-operation law technically that is correct, they can reduce impact for business group and owner of properties will face up alot of challenges, still subject to whether risk to impact group's trustworthy taking under consideration. Because it might impact entire business operation and future development especially you are a public company. to mitigate the risk, this is why they wanted to pull out from property segment and focus on the utility segment. the delay of pacific for more than a year and still counting had has already impact the confident of buyer, and dont think they going risk the group's profit to recover the reputation in property segment which the company is not keen to continue mixed development at ara fail miserably, the second mix development still struggle to complete. both development have been caused the company lose million in last few years. no plan to revive both of them but restructure......what you think? This post has been edited by Nikmon: Jan 22 2018, 04:18 PM |
|
|
Jan 23 2018, 12:10 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(yihyang @ Jan 22 2018, 11:06 PM) It is hard to tell on the restructure intention now and it is always pro and con, restructure because of asset collateral issue on balance sheet might be one of good way to access banking financial support because you will have better presenting number. As public company you want to strike off a child company by moving all net loss into one shell might potential impact a parent company as well. In co-operate law system already considering this loophole before, co-operate law keep enhanced along the way since year 1965 until now and if strike off all debts under one empty company very high risk. Personal point of view potential on this act is not high because it might also involve high to low management level criminal charge for act execution and furthermore it might potential involve fraudulent on entity reselling or cross tie on ownership. Worst case might causing share liquidation on trustworthy scandal which might causing further liquidate in house free cost capital and it might potential sink the parent ship as well. In year 1998, a lot of similar act happen in Asia countries and ending is not good for both parties. your judgement is bias, there is no 'Pro' for the restructure,if you are the staff working under the subsidiary and know that company is making lose and Shareholder want to close the company for good, what will you do? if you are bank, a making lose and going to close company looking for financing, the cost of financing definitely will be high and no profit how to repay? what will you do? if you are buyer, delay and delay, and delay, do you still have confident toward the company? do you still trust them and buy their next project. the restructure at this point of time only put salt on the current situation and no benefit to the property subsidiary. it is going to close for good, what is 'Pro' factor? from the shareholder point of view, the group should move on than only the share could go higher. |
|
|
Jan 23 2018, 06:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Feb 21 2018, 11:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
https://www.thestar.com.my/business/busines...ank-guarantees/
it going to cost a lot more to complete this project... |
|
|
Feb 25 2018, 12:09 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 17 2018, 09:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Aug 18 2018, 06:20 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
Apr 20 2019, 03:35 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
May 8 2019, 10:59 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
The longer construction duration...haha
|
|
|
Jun 5 2019, 01:33 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
This time should be real, from outside it almost done, the office block light is up, the lobby also ready. The middle retail also got light, should be ready within 2 months
|
|
|
Jun 5 2019, 01:36 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,780 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
The retail target to start business by 3rd quoter onward.
|
| Change to: | 0.0288sec
0.61
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 01:58 PM |