QUOTE(paul23 @ Jul 31 2013, 11:55 PM)
I was going to say, but giving them low resolution files, or no files at all, merely forces them to make copies of the prints you do give them; ensuring that the copies are even worse.
Then I realized that you do not sign the photos. So it's not like if the photo is sitting on their wall, you worry that their friends would see the horrible result, and that would kill your reputation.
ahhh that's the thing.Then I realized that you do not sign the photos. So it's not like if the photo is sitting on their wall, you worry that their friends would see the horrible result, and that would kill your reputation.
nowadays those who engage those high-profile photographers aren't exactly not savvy either.
they're like TS, they see the resolution they know it won't look good beyond 4R print. they know only suitable for web.
at least by not giving high reso photo, it already is a form of check against printing. I tell you, some photo studios are just horrible. I've printed for competition and printed at 4R shops (eg Foto-zoom) for non-competition stuff. Difference is huge, imagine blowing up the image to say 16" by 20". It's going to be a joke, not because the image are bad but the lousy print.
Let's just say low res is not an absolute check but it discourages people from doing so.
QUOTE(paul23 @ Jul 31 2013, 11:55 PM)
If they were copying the prints, they could see that the duplicate is not like the original, and would blame the shop doing it for them, rather than you the photographer.
Explains not giving any softcopy, but not the low resolution file. Then again, I see some customers would want some files to put on facebook, blog, etc. When you give the softcopy, do you tell your clients it's only for that, and not for printing because the resolution is not high enough?
here's the thing..........Explains not giving any softcopy, but not the low resolution file. Then again, I see some customers would want some files to put on facebook, blog, etc. When you give the softcopy, do you tell your clients it's only for that, and not for printing because the resolution is not high enough?
while many are aware of resolution for detail, many are not aware about print quality.
so supposedly this couple printed it and thinks it's ok. And put it on display some place.
Then one day a friend, let's say a photography enthusiasts who knows a bit here and there but not that experienced. (*now do note that most people stop at the question WHO TOOK THE PHOTO, no one actually asks who prints them because it's generally assumed that the photo studio handles the prints too, just like any other bridal house*).
so in the end, this photography enthusiasts may just think "Oh Mr BC Studio did a lousy job in printing" and then word goes around.
I understand where you're coming from Paul but there's the other side of the picture which is what the seasoned photographers practice. The reason they practice it because they learned from past mistakes of others.
Aug 1 2013, 12:04 AM
Quote


0.0208sec
1.12
5 queries
GZIP Disabled