Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.21, D610 and D5300 kambing soon!?

views
     
dvlzplayground
post Jul 24 2013, 10:09 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(GreenJellyBean @ Jul 24 2013, 08:23 PM)
Anyone have experience with Yongnuo YN568EX for nikon? I plan to get one if the feedback is positive.
*
consider a used sb600 if it's ur first flash

QUOTE(f5calvin @ Jul 24 2013, 09:10 PM)
i've nissin 622 mk2..used for almost a year.. not bad la i'd say..may not be so accurate bt still adjustable in PS or LR..no idea with yongnuo..

now i dilemma wanna get 35mm 1.8G =.= dno wanna sell my 50 1.8g
*
35mm better for DX bro.. hehe.. my opinion la tongue.gif
dvlzplayground
post Jul 28 2013, 11:49 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


i have a few friends selling 70-200 f/2.8s (nikon n canon) due to the weight hahaha. glad i bought a 85/1.8 instead tongue.gif
dvlzplayground
post Aug 25 2013, 04:48 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(QiAnG @ Aug 25 2013, 02:21 PM)
Hello guys, been a constant reader here for quite some time but never really posted anything except on the Fuji thread because I own an x100.

Noticed the limitation on my x100 while shooting a church event few weeks ago, so am planning to get a used d7000 along with a long 2.8 telephoto

With my budget, I've narrowed down to 2 lenses, Nikon 80-200 2.8 AFD Push Pull and Sigma 70-200 2.8 APO Macro II. Need some suggestions on which lenses has the better value for money, been researching for weeks and still couldn't get an answer =.=

Wanting to try them both out but it's impossible to find these used stuffs in Miri, even new ones are hard to come by. So I hope some sifus here who might've used them can give me some feedback in these 2 lenses =)
*
x100 alone wont be good enough to cover an event tongue.gif

i dont know about the sigma but the nikon 80-200 push pull is too heavy for me. there's a camera shop behind sin liang selling this lens used (maybe uve been there? haha). tried it before... AF speed is kinda slow though.

my solution for a long range fast lens is the 85/1.8G. wayyy faster, cheaper n lighter than any 70/80-200 but need to crop a lot haha tongue.gif saw too many friends selling their 70-200 cuz of the size n weight
dvlzplayground
post Aug 26 2013, 01:56 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


in my case, started as hobby, then got serious... now cannot do serious anymore bcuz of unpredictable work schedule... so back to hobby tongue.gif

thought of selling my whole system n get a fuji x100s. but too sayang lahh
dvlzplayground
post Aug 26 2013, 02:17 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


yeah that's what i plan to do. slowly2 collect money for a x100s n get a used unit when a replacement model comes along

just too gatal always read a lot about the x100s hahah
dvlzplayground
post Aug 27 2013, 03:49 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Aug 27 2013, 03:23 PM)
question: we do know newer body ISO performance is lesser noise...but how about if we set same setting in Aperture mode, same ISO?

will newer body perform faster shutter speed compare to old one with:
1) same ISO
2) same aperture

and What IF FX vs DX? (generally i only know sensor is larger; hence it is adsorb more light only)
then if same ISO, same Aperture, will FX have faster shutter speed than DX?
*
i dont think there'll be a difference in shutter speed. for example, if u shoot a D40 and a D7100 in aperture priority mode at f/3.5, ISO 1600.... both old noisy body and new body will choose the same shutter speed (same shot, same metering mode, etc)

the only difference would be the D40 photo will be much noisier compared to the D7100 photo.

BUT if u set auto ISO... you can be confortable setting the max ISO on the D7100 higher (say 6400) compared to the D40 (maybe 1600), since D40 at IS0 6400 would be ugly. so in this case, as u allow ur camera to automatically select a higher ISO, then it will use a faster shutter speed smile.gif

same thing when comparing DX and FX. if u shoot at the same aperture and ISO, the shutter speed will also be the same. but you can be confortable setting a high max auto ISO on an FX rather than a DX.

sifu correct me if im wrong. no experience using FF body tongue.gif

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Aug 27 2013, 03:50 PM
dvlzplayground
post Aug 27 2013, 06:53 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(Agito666 @ Aug 27 2013, 03:53 PM)
i mean, newer tech always give cleaner noise in same ISO value.
and slightly larger dynamic range (D70s vs D600)

video one is OLD DX vs NEW FX lol....
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


so what if:
1) Aperture mode
2) Fixed aperture
3) Fixed ISO

so the body will make faster shutter speed in same light condition? (new tech vs old tech)

also what if both body is new tech, but FX vs DX sensor?  tongue.gif
*
ehh i already directly answer your question! vmad.gif

the answer is no tongue.gif the camera metering system will select the same shutter speed no matter new/old sensor or FX/DX sensor (assume fixed aperture, fixed ISO, fixed lighting condition, fixed metering mode). the only difference is the amount of noise. in fact, at lower ISO (e.g. 200, 400) there's no difference at all
dvlzplayground
post Aug 28 2013, 04:35 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


no mention of the sigma 15/2.8 fisheye? tongue.gif im using one. at first very disappointed because not very sharp wide open... hv to step down to around f/4 baru nice haha

user posted image
dvlzplayground
post Aug 29 2013, 10:14 AM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(jchue73 @ Aug 28 2013, 10:40 PM)
A fisheye that does not give fisheye effect?
*
oh that was corrected for distortion n slightly cropped... was trying to show the sharpness

in hindsight i shouldve posted an uncorrected and uncropped photo instead doh.gif

This post has been edited by dvlzplayground: Aug 29 2013, 10:14 AM
dvlzplayground
post Aug 29 2013, 01:44 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(KTCY @ Aug 29 2013, 11:36 AM)
selling my everything. anyone interested ? tongue.gif

https://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2939519&hl=
*
i hope ure not quitting photography! always liked ur photos tongue.gif
dvlzplayground
post Sep 3 2013, 12:46 PM

Web developer Nadzim.com
*******
Senior Member
7,916 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(cyclone9 @ Sep 2 2013, 10:05 PM)
i duno what other lens to buy

17-50mm 2.8 or wide llens ?

i already have 35mm 1.8G with d5100

shooting landscape + street
*
if u get the 17-50 maybe ull hardly use the 35mm later tongue.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0483sec    0.56    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:53 PM