1.41b volume, 1.45b value.
big sharks play now.

so many!
1720 first, i guess.

Retail sales in Malaysia are expected to grow at a faster rate this year – up
6.4% to RM94.4bn from a growth rate of 5.5% to RM88bn in 2012, driven by
domestic demand, said RGM Retail Group (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd retail
consultant and managing director Tan Hai Hsin. The growth projection is in line
with the country's gross domestic product growth forecast of between 5% and
6% this year.
 For 2014, he said RGM is predicting a growth rate of 6% in the retail
sector.
 "We have to look at how the GDP moves. Usually, retail sales growth
moves in relation to the GDP's growth. It is about 1% or 2% higher that
GDP. That is our barometer," he added. (The Sun).

10k profit wiped off from my yesterday's profile on paper.

party!

wah good student.

All waiting for Wed's Fed talking?

some s-reit now yield 7-8%.

This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 20 2013, 03:40 PM

i like that.
still remember small kid that time, FD also 12%.

local fund support like mad. like this how to fall sharp sharp woh.

how come? i thought you chase bull trend and suppose to earn big time there?

different. very different.
one is if fundamentally good, paper loss may turned into paper profit in future. just need "time" to do its magical touch.
other is....loss immediately.


This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 20 2013, 04:18 PM

my pants too, many of our pants too for today.
still, if holding a good stock, no need over panic.

you should go to 7-eleven. Buy a cool drink, watch some porn movies, chill out.

exactly.
it's a psychology game after all.
that's why only 5% investors+traders earn money in stock market.
so how many forumers here? most probably only 5% of us are actually making money in long run.
talk is free. play stock is expensive.

This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 20 2013, 04:50 PM

your dlady and nestle also hold up well.

same strategy as mine. i can't think of any other strategy that's better, i'm quite dump one. unable to innovate like Tony does.

This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 20 2013, 05:05 PM

ya, read that their recent profit up is because of property development.

Ben Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve and inarguably one of the most important economists today, has publicly chided his fellow economic brethren for their inability to correctly forecast the future.
“Economics is a highly sophisticated field of thought that is superb at explaining to policymakers precisely why the choices they made in the past were wrong,” he told Princeton University graduates this May. “About the future, not so much.”
This week Bernanke and other central bankers will convene in Jackson Hole, Wyo., for their annual summer retreat. They’ll speculate, they’ll pontificate and they’ll ruminate about how to fix the sluggish U.S. economy and boost job growth. Solutions and proposals will be shared and debated. But very few of this year’s attendees will accurately predict how the U.S. or global economy will perform next year.
Related: Why the U.S. Economy Deserves a "B-" Grade
For these reasons investors are better off tuning out the economic noise, says Barry Ritholtz, CEO of Fusion IQ and CIO of The Ritholtz Group.
“Economists distract investors from what’s important,” he tells The Daily Ticker.
Ritholtz points to the monthly nonfarm payrolls number as a perfect example of what he's talking about -- a data point that is closely tracked by investors, economists and policymakers. An upside surprise in the jobs report could lead to a 100-point spike in the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Yet a number that misses the consensus estimate could send U.S. markets plunging. Ritholtz says these diversions confuse investors and cause them to take their eye off the [investing] ball.
“The jobs report is overrated… it’s meaningless,” he says. “All we care about are the long-term trends: is the economy creating jobs? Are wages going up or are wages flat? What does this mean relative to inflation?”
Related: $2 Trillion Shadow Economy Not Counted in Jobs Numbers
Ritholtz lists 10 reasons why economists should not be taken too seriously in a recent Washington Post editorial. There are exceptions to every rule, and Ritholtz does name a handful of economists that he says are getting it right (watch the video above to see who makes the cut). When it comes to grading the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), Ritholtz does not hold back:
“The Fed overly relies on models,” he argues. “They’re kind of winging it. I think they’re doing the best they can do. They don’t have a cooperative Congress. They’re in uncharted waters. They’re flinging stuff against the barn wall to see what sticks.”

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticke...-121046880.html

that could be the next thread's title.
or maybe that thread could be.....1600 or 1700?