QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jul 24 2013, 04:06 PM)
That is because this staff does not post many vids in Lowyat.. I got so used to posting in FB that I used the FB link instead of our own youtube tags.air filter works vs k&n
air filter works vs k&n
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 04:11 PM
|
|
Staff
5,568 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: the lack of sleep |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Jul 24 2013, 01:12 PM) What dyno chart fails to show you is the small difference (yes, it's only small..) in throttle response that you get when you run with non-paper filters. Changes like throttle response from 30% to 50% is where you feel the difference. yeap exactly the same as my experience. while i cannot quantify my throttle response improvement, it certainly makes it easier to perform sudden/on-demand accelerations for overtaking or just simply wanting to speed faster.and yes i've ran my carb without filter vs proton's ori filter, the difference is there so i figured that K&N's improved air flow (without much compromise in filtration) would benefit me. the oil/having carb dirtier is also not too huge of a concern since i use 3bond carb/throttle cleaners pretty regularly because i can't stand slow throttle responses anyways in the end the only thing as i mentioned holding me back was the stupid pricing, which i gave in when it was on 20% discount QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Jul 24 2013, 04:11 PM) That is because this staff does not post many vids in Lowyat.. I got so used to posting in FB that I used the FB link instead of our own youtube tags. hehe fair enough This post has been edited by Quazacolt: Jul 24 2013, 04:12 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2013, 04:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,412 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
and i believe certain ECU do take a lil time to adjust to the new amount of airflow received after changing the air filter. Correct me if i'm wrong
|
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 08:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
592 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
to answer ur question TS, between K&N & Works...which one better..i don't know. But i'm using K&N
as for those who said paper filter is better than K&N filter...well i'm sure they never used K&N filter b4. price wise probably (rm10/20000km vs rm230/40000km but usable). Not that u can expect a big increment in HP but i can assure its definitely feels different compared to stock filter |
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 08:32 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
54 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: terengganu |
must try all and feels different... but i'm using K&N...
|
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 09:57 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
224 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(LOceng @ Jul 30 2013, 08:32 AM) Good topic.I'm also contemplating in works or k&n. Works cost Rm 150 while k&n rm 270. Almost double.... I'm using k&n drop in for my savvy, every 10k, I will clean the filter and oil them without fail. I won't say there's any improvement, just my engine can breathe better and cleaner. Hearsay drop in helps in pick up. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 11:06 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
592 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(kurty @ Jul 30 2013, 09:57 AM) Good topic. wow u very rajin 10k km already service eh? mine i did it every 40k km atleastI'm also contemplating in works or k&n. Works cost Rm 150 while k&n rm 270. Almost double.... I'm using k&n drop in for my savvy, every 10k, I will clean the filter and oil them without fail. I won't say there's any improvement, just my engine can breathe better and cleaner. Hearsay drop in helps in pick up. |
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 11:10 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Jul 2013 |
go for k&n...works got so many imitation stuff...
|
|
|
Jul 30 2013, 01:46 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
224 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(noir7559 @ Jul 30 2013, 11:06 AM) haha, i always believe in maintaining the car, in return, it will serve you well.i'm using amsoil since day 1 for my savvy, from engine to gear to steering.. kinda expensive but really good.. only this recent year, then i begin to cut corners.. somemore my savvy got CAI, so very responsive |
|
|
Jul 31 2013, 08:27 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
54 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: terengganu |
QUOTE(kurty @ Jul 30 2013, 01:46 PM) haha, i always believe in maintaining the car, in return, it will serve you well. agree. long-term investment, and a important thing car is not sitting roadside with emergency lights i'm using amsoil since day 1 for my savvy, from engine to gear to steering.. kinda expensive but really good.. only this recent year, then i begin to cut corners.. somemore my savvy got CAI, so very responsive |
|
|
Oct 29 2015, 09:03 AM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Mar 2014 |
Fm my point of view..its a combination factor.it is impossible to gain soooo much power if one just use the replacement air filter.kn or even works will perform better if we consider factor such as;
1. Spark plug.always cx the recommended gap.either standard,iridium,platinum etc.. 2.throttle body. Cleaner is better. 3.voltage stabilizer plus grounding cable. 4.silicon cable plug. Fit these 4 together with kn or works,and you shall feel the different.other things to consider are 1.tyre condition.always adhere to manufacture recomendation. 2.accesorries installed in car.easy to understand.more gadjet installed..more power needed. And so many other factor to consider. Kn or work surely will nott make your stock kancil into lancer turbo performance.not in life,not even in a dream.kn or works goal is to give effiency and smoothess. Proven on my brother's 20 years old proton.smoothess and efficiency that we want.not suddens turbo performance.thats riddicilous.lol. |
|
|
Oct 29 2015, 11:35 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,772 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(MrRookie @ Oct 29 2015, 09:03 AM) Fm my point of view..its a combination factor.it is impossible to gain soooo much power if one just use the replacement air filter.kn or even works will perform better if we consider factor such as; you searched for a 2 yeard old topic?1. Spark plug.always cx the recommended gap.either standard,iridium,platinum etc.. 2.throttle body. Cleaner is better. 3.voltage stabilizer plus grounding cable. 4.silicon cable plug. Fit these 4 together with kn or works,and you shall feel the different.other things to consider are 1.tyre condition.always adhere to manufacture recomendation. 2.accesorries installed in car.easy to understand.more gadjet installed..more power needed. And so many other factor to consider. Kn or work surely will nott make your stock kancil into lancer turbo performance.not in life,not even in a dream.kn or works goal is to give effiency and smoothess. Proven on my brother's 20 years old proton.smoothess and efficiency that we want.not suddens turbo performance.thats riddicilous.lol. This post has been edited by rcracer: Oct 29 2015, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Oct 29 2015, 03:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,616 posts Joined: Dec 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 1 2015, 08:41 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
1 posts Joined: Mar 2014 |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 12:42 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
406 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
Thanks for sharing your knowledge
|
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 01:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jul 23 2013, 03:39 PM) im using it, the difference isn't exactly huge nor do i have dyno to prove anything. I actually have a few dynos of stock car with stock drop in vs stock car with K&N drop in.i would say though i like the air intake sound (despite being a carbie drop in rofl) that is louder as you approach red line and if anything, you create less waste as the filter usage is permanent (only need to buy their cleaning/re-charger kit) oh you get cool k&n vinyls/stickers for your dull looking ufo carb lo Stock (not very clean) - better torque, lower hp. K&N - lower torque, higher hp. Within 2 to 3nm and 2 to 3hp, that difference alone can also be attributed to error difference. |
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 01:57 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Feb 22 2016, 01:22 PM) I actually have a few dynos of stock car with stock drop in vs stock car with K&N drop in. Pretty much same result for the inspira heheStock (not very clean) - better torque, lower hp. K&N - lower torque, higher hp. Within 2 to 3nm and 2 to 3hp, that difference alone can also be attributed to error difference. |
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 02:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
512 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 02:13 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,369 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2016, 05:41 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
63 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: Ampang, KL |
I've used K&N before and sold it off before letting it slowly damage my engine. If you hold it up against background light, you'll see tiny holes in which fine dirt can go through. The size of the particles that can go through it is enough to cause engine harm.
I've switched to regular paper filter as it traps dirt better and did not notice a drop in performance. This is better long term wise in terms of engine health (piston seals etc). Just keep in mind to change it regularly every 20k-30k km. |
| Change to: | 0.0224sec
1.18
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 05:08 AM |