BTW,the point bring up on Lancer GT vs Inspira is regarding the ECU map
You can download ROM from both car,have correct definition and you can compare them in ECUFlash
In this case,it is exactly the same

Conclusion is, the few of you are bunch of idiots that don't understand basic English. The result obviously shows the weight difference between original Lancer GT with heaviest Inspira with larger rim + full bodykit. Despite putting everything in, the Inspira Premium even with 18" Lancer rim, as per K3nnYkl82 could only go max 1360kg. It still can't get anywhere close to Lancer GT kerb weight 1385kg. Is this not good enough for the answer?

Mercury, 2011 lancer have the exact same rom as inspira d. 57330001

5733001 are for 2.0 cvt inspira.
I did a fren lancer 2.0 .. 2011 .. Same 57330001
Urs 57370001 is for 4B10.

Anyhow I know timing chain is to save fuel
And vvti is only good for timing chain
Turbo are useless especially subaru one

newer one 57330002 .
no tuning diff

proton have to pay mitsu for new rom I bet.

Older lancer have a diff tune..
newer one .. since 2011 all same.
Same ROM ID in Mitsubishi is SAME ..
they don't alter tuning and save as SAME ID ..
they both have the same output

if u wan understand what Mitsubishi is doing ... think in a business perspective .. not consumer end ..

I sell to proton , every month they HIT quota .. I constant supply parts .. dun need worry after sales.. dun need setup sales counter.. dun need worry shipment. Dun need worry so many things.. as long as I SELL my parts .. I get $$ ..

Yea .. Lancer owner might get upset and dun support us (Mitsubishi) in future .. but who cares ? mitsu selling like 300 unit per year ? .. proton selling like 3-5k per year ... tot of it at revenue side .. which one more ?

and if u looking at WHY SAME OUTPUT .. SIMPLE .. Do you wan to spend EXTRA MANPOWER to tune purposely for proton ? such a small amount of sales ??  (comparing as a global car) .. If I were mitsu .. I wouldn't give a Damn on the tuning .. its juz another business.. why spend more to detune it ? (remember proton agreement was not to touch the engine and mechanical , except for absorber setup) ...

So it is very logic that mitsu just plug in the latest map (as of their agreement) .. and settle with it .. that's why newer batch lancer have a diff ROM ID already .. but tuning also detune d due to emission control .. but yet inspira is stuck at the map as of the launch ..

Have to think BIG bro ..

Still involve WORK right ?
they have to do properly and tune properly eventhou detune ..
its all about $$ .. WHY for the sake of 300 units lancer per year ? .. and u ask ur engineer to DETUNE for proton ?
might as well juz leave it ?
There is no advantage in detuning it .. and yet it has no impact on their business.. be it proton sell or they sell they make money .. infact I think they gain more when proton sell .. due to the fact that "Loyalty Fees" .. yes .. proton have to pay that .. that's why u see in Langkawi proton inspira cost more ..

Took from official mitsu lancer spec. 20mm.
UR bar is 23 or 25mm..

Such question from you??
You sure u not trolling?

Basic of the roll bar is to make both side of the wheel to work together.. (layman terms).. So when u connering.. The roll bar will make sure the other wheel work together with it and not work independently..  The big the bar the less roll..  But the ride will be harsher.. Bcoz when u drive normally .. One side hit uneven road the roll bar will pull the other side as well.

anti roll bars or sway bars do make difference in cornering, the 1st thing you notice will be less body roll. other than the larger diameter on the ultra racing one, the stock ARB is hollow and its solid on the ultraracing and other aftermarket brand. so imagine a hollow tube vs larger solid tube. which one more rigid? my previous FD2 with full UR anti roll bars, GAB SS fully adjustable with 10k spring rate front and 6k rear. i gave many turbo cars a hard time in corners. lol.