Be a gentlemen and do not resort to such words implicating family members.

Just bumped into this thread. Didn't read the beginning. But if I were to invent a baccarat method that yield 98%, I would sell my underwear and gamble myself. Why would I share my technique with the general public?

Stupid logic.

Conclusion

The obvious flaw in SureWin4u’s 100% success rate baccarat strategy ruse is that, if it existed, Ong Kean Suan wouldn’t need anybody’s money to profit from it.

Money from a loan, his own money, that of his family’s… with a 100% win rate it wouldn’t matter, he’d be in profit in no time. Grab a laptop, create an account at an online casino and away you go.

The SureWin4u FAQ quotes an estimate daily ROI of 10% company-wide using the strategy, so there’s really no need for affiliate investment at all. Unless…

With the baccarat strategy ruse out of the way, what we’re left with is a simple Ponzi scheme. Affiliates buy in and Ong Kean Suan uses that money to pay off existing investors.

ROIs staggered monthly and only paid out every quarter meaning that when the inevitably collapse hits, affiliates are unlikely to see it coming. With access to the amount of money coming and what he owes investors though, Ong no doubt will and that’s when he’ll likely disappear.

Hell, even if there was a mythical 100% win rate strategy for baccarat, still the concept of paying SureWin4u and then getting them to play the strategy (the alleged source of the ROIs the company pays out), makes no sense.

Pay your fee, learn the strategy and go and use it yourself.

SureWin4u creating a >100% ROI liability for each dollar they bring in makes little sense outside of the obvious Ponzi scheme business model Ong Kean Suan is using to pay off existing investors.

What’s really eye-opening is the hundreds of thousands of dollars in play at the upper investment levels. With ROI caps in place, naturally the idea is that affiliates will re-invest much, if not all of their winnings and progress up the investment levels.

Quite obviously it’d only take a few of the top-level investments to mature to bankrupt the system, and when that happens… losing a few thousand dollars in a Ponzi scheme is bad enough, but a hundred thousand or more?

That’s one heck of an expensive lesson in the pitfalls of Ponzi schemes.

Finally, it’s also worth noting that SureWin4u already appears to already be on the Malaysian regulatory radar.

Listed as “Dream Success International Sdn Bhd (1002002-P)”, SureWin4u appears on a list ‘of known companies and websites which are not authorised nor approved under the relevant laws and regulations administered by‘ the Central Bank of Malaysia.

http://behindmlm.com/companies/surewin4u-r...carat-strategy/

Later when the leader absconds or (fingers crossed) get caught by authorities, the "victims" will come out of the woodworks and protest that Malaysia government broke their rice bowl.

After some time, the leader will be a free man again, and will start a new scheme.

Same ol' same ol'.

Common sense lah, no matter how surewin a biz model, it still need capital to operate n expand n flourish. Our money is the capital! Tell me any biz in this world runs without capital?

Adoi pity u, this only prove how small your world is.
hello we r talking about millions of millions of biz lor, these money only small potatoes. Wat we said in mandarin, 小菜一碟。

Can't wait for those that defended this to come back crying warning ppl to beware of this when they lost everything

He has nothing to hold but some e-points. 
Selling e-points for money aka scamming.