Hi Perfomance ram for k7, thinking to run at 2-2-2-11@240++
|
|
 May 4 2006, 01:28 AM, updated 20y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
cause want to playing now days on9 game thinking to change the ram to 1gb
now i am using kingston hyperx DDR333 ultra low delay ram(2-2-2-5) (if change to 2x512 value ram fell like down gread) so now day wht ram can run 2-2-2-11(2-3-3-11 oso can) at hi fsb ?(like 250mhz) cause i have a unlock 1700+  si fu here pls gv me some comment......  |
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2006, 01:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
but i heard some ppl say the new BH5 not work well at NF2 board oo
|
|
|
May 7 2006, 01:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
so if i buy a pair of twinmos speed premium 2x512 which using new BH5
i just can run in single channel with 1t timming or dual channel 2t timming cause really think to overclock more before change to other system and TCCD really hard to find now days with low price |
|
|
May 7 2006, 12:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ May 7 2006, 11:21 AM) I suggest you get Something Like UCCC 512mbx2. It is single sided ram.And even the timing is loose. 8-3-3-3.0..when you dual Channel on K7...it will give u up to 95-96% bandwitdh efficiency which will beat BH5 at 5-2-2-2.0 which giving u 93% at single channel. IF dual u get 96%. I personally tested it. So i guess your best ram for your budget is UCCC. emm...but i dun think tat UCCC can beat BH5 at super pi and i find tat UCCC on 512mb per stick hard to find also just see before corsair value got UCCC at 1gb stick or buy just buy BH5/TCCD 2x512 and running in single channel 1t and 2t at dual channel will the result batter? or if i plug 2 stick duoble side ram with single or double channel the system will not boot or crash in windows? |
|
|
May 7 2006, 04:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
236 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ May 7 2006, 02:53 PM) In K8 Athlon64..definately BH5 pwn it due to higher memory bandwidth efficiency due to Tight timing. Anyway..on K7..it different story. Since UCCC can do 260-270FSB easily at low vdimm. And yet...you can dual channel the UCCC easily and bring up the bandwidth efficiency above what a BH5 can offer u. ooo really thx si fu 512x2 BH5 at DDR500 5-2-2-2.0 Single Channel 1T will give u around 3700mb/sec bandwidth. 512x2 BH5 at DDR450 5-2-2-2.0 Dual Channel 1/2T will give you only 3400mb/sec bandwidth. 512x2 UCCC at DDR500 8-3-3-3.0 Dual Channel 1T will give u up to 3800mb/sec bandwidth. 512x2 UCCC at DDR500 8-3-3-3.0 SingleChannel 1T will give u up to 3400-3500mb/sec bandwidth. If you can get ur Barton run at DDR540-550 on UCCC dual channel...i guess BH5 will be totally pwn by it by 10-15% performence margin. Believe it or not..try it yourself. That what i can help u based on my experience. I already retired K7 for almost 1/2 years. Running Dual Channel 15-5-5-3.0 with 1/2T on K7 offer performence greater then 5-2-2-2.0 Single Channel 1T. It because under DC the extra bandwidth in too big for the K7 Archtitecture to handle and hence it will use it to squeze the ram to perform at higher efficiency up 95-96% under any timing. so i think going to low yat to search for 512mb x2 of UCCC |
| Change to: |  0.0144sec
 0.46
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 11:17 PM |
Quote