Haswell, Devil's Canyon, Pentium G3258 OC V1, 4790K/4760K/4770K/4670K/G3258 | LGA1150
|
|
 Jan 1 2014, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 
|
Halloo ;p
Just finished my cheap Haswell setup Havent OC yet but at booting already got few error msg Such "The following channel did not pass cpu memory test" Wht prob arr?? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2014, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 1 2014, 09:43 AM) Either its good ram and you're not placing it in the channels needed to be filled first. Some mobo's have to have ram in 1 slot before any others are filled. Read the mobo manual. I tried few setting still prob regarding men issueIf its bad ram and RMA it and it should fix the issue. If you have 1 stick of usable ram, plug it into each of the memory slots and and test it to see if you get the same error. Forumers are advised to put system specs in the siggy.  I tried each stick one by one, both can boot to windows Setup as single channel lane red + black, no problem Issue raise when it comes to dual channel I think my board got prob, demn.. |
|
|
Jan 1 2014, 11:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Since today is holiday, will try call shop to exchange coz I just bought it yesterday
Im sure I placed all component correctly Gonna give a call first if they we operating today Will bring along my damn heavy machine lol |
|
|
Jan 1 2014, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 1 2014, 04:48 PM) Good then. All the best for your new rig. Done, they replace the boardAll working as it should be    |
|
|
Jan 2 2014, 12:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 1 2014, 10:49 PM) Glad to hear that you managed to "solve" it. Not so soon broDon't forget to share with us your OC results here.  Still running on stock cooler..  |
|
|
Jan 25 2014, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Guys, is Win 7 x64 SP1 having prob displaying the correct Haswell freq??
  |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2014, 09:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 26 2014, 07:10 AM) Thats normal. CPU-Z is more useful for that job. Owh, one more thingI cant fix my Bus Speed to 100 even I put manual value & Spread Spectrum Disable Is that common for Asrock board? |
|
|
Jan 29 2014, 09:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(coolice @ Jan 28 2014, 08:39 PM) MEI and ME related Demn noob in HaswellWht is MEI & ME for??  |
|
|
Feb 5 2014, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Feb 4 2014, 06:10 PM) Intel "Management Engine Interface" and "Management Engine". Thank you taikor  Btw, does it have connection in overclocking? Should leave default or better at disable? |
|
|
Feb 6 2014, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Feb 6 2014, 03:22 PM) sorry wasnt following the thread. Heh, Im asking if this got to do with overclocking, & seems your answer is yesdont get what ure saying Intel MEI/ME is a driver thing afaik to control cpu functions. without it overclocks wont work in windows afaik. although since p67 mobo manufactorers found a away around it with uefi etc. 2nd, Im asking if the MEI/ ME got option to disable or enable  |
|
|
Feb 6 2014, 05:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(cstkl1 @ Feb 6 2014, 03:51 PM) eh disable. can lar. go to service and disable lol. Seriously? I thought you said cannot OC laterHahaa.. |
|
|
Feb 7 2014, 08:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 7 2014, 12:53 AM) Related: http://www.hardocp.com/article/2014/01/29/.../7#.UvO8hLSgh9Y Thanks for the tips but is that possible to set the value by 0.1 increment?A temporary "fix" is by setting the BCLK one notch higher than 100MHz such as 100.1 or 100.2 etc. My Z87 OCF doesn't have this issue though. I cant test right now coz working, might check up later  Wow w0ot?! Such nice review almost cannot believe what exactly this board could offers This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 7 2014, 08:37 AM |
|
|
Feb 7 2014, 09:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 7 2014, 09:03 AM) I don't have the board so no idea. But it seems like you have fixed it already with that BCLK @ 100.15MHz Heh, me also just realize coz previously the value drop around 99.8Mhz even I put 100Mhz at BIOS  I think the adjustment effect a bit later, lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 8 2014, 02:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
owikh84
Ive read over the net, few forum regarding OC not recommended Prime95 for Haswell as they mention Prime95 gone really beyond the limits They suggesting AIDA64 as it were optimized for Haswell Wht dya think? This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 8 2014, 02:13 PM |
|
|
Feb 10 2014, 08:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 10 2014, 06:51 AM) Yes, I have heard of that too but won't take it as a good direction. So how bout IBT? It seems that IBT further extreme compared to Prime95As for me, what's the point of using a second most stressful app if there's already a better one on top of it. Example, at same setting, my rig fails stressed with Prime at 40 minutes But for IBT, it seems much faster, at 7th round it BSOD This post has been edited by gengstapo: Feb 10 2014, 08:33 AM |
|
|
Feb 11 2014, 02:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Prime is more into power consumption?
That means it stress the PSU as well? Is your rig passed the Linpack 11? |
|
|
Feb 11 2014, 08:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Ahh ic, in my situation, when I ran IBT, setup 43x100 it could passed
But when I increase the multi to 44x100, it crashed/ BSOD, both are same vCore This mean I need to increase the voltage right? Btw, does the cache multi affecting our OC stability?? |
|
|
Jul 8 2014, 03:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Is it worth to upgrade frm z87 to z97?
More improvement upon overclocking? |
|
|
Aug 28 2014, 08:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
QUOTE(meons @ Aug 26 2014, 01:19 AM) before use devil proc.. need reflash bios latest bios 1st using old haswell proc Lol wht a hassle? Dont they figure this would troublesome us as user? |
|
|
Feb 13 2015, 11:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005
|
Asrock released new update BIOS 1.50 for Z87 Killer series
I dont know if it juz me but I found my machine aint stable at 4.4Ghz speed After I downgrade back to 1.40, my rig working very well |
| Change to: |  0.0391sec
 0.81
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 03:30 PM |
Quote