QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 2 2013, 06:20 PM)
As usual, this thread has degenerated into a mess of ad hominems. All in good fun of course, but not a very fruitful discussion.
Nevertheless, has anyone cared to comment on the impact of the tapering of QE in the regional economy? The ringgit has fallen considerably relative to the USD. Where is the money flowing out from? Government Bonds? Our KLCI hasn't fallen that much.
Anyway, why is QE relevant?
To my mind, the fundamental value of property on a *macro* basis hasn't changed at all in the past 5 years. By macro, I mean the attractiveness of property vis a vis other asset classes, and the attractiveness of Malaysian property vis a vis property in other countries. What has changed is the perception of the investing public as to the attractiveness of property as an investment class. Whether that perception shift is permanent, or whether it will reverse is still an open question, hence the present debate.
I note that the momentum of rising prices has already faded, and this sucks a lot of speculative euphoria out of the market. I'm therefore trending towards a reversal in the trend, but only if there is a systemic shock to the economy because prices will remain sticky in the context of our kiasu culture. One candidate which I have been monitoring as a factor for a systemic shock is the outflow of foreign funds following the end of QE. A reduction in liquidity, the fall in the MYR and a fall in the stock market will lead to an increase in interest rates, and a reduction in the wealth effect, thereby reducing the demand for luxury products like fancy houses.
Any thoughts?
To flippers, QE is something too far away to have an impact on local property market.
QUOTE(cybermaster98 @ Jul 2 2013, 10:29 PM)
Every year there will be the normal inflation caused escalation in prices and property is not spared. We must be careful not to associate ALL price increases with a potential property bubble. Property bubbles are usually created after a prolonged period of sharp increases in prices which may not be sustainable in the long run. Im not sure if Klang Valley falls under this category or not. Yes we are seeing increases the past 6 years but does it qualify as a predecessor to a bubble?

Property price rise should correspondence to income else is unsustainable. Has income in the past 6 years keep up with property price?
QUOTE(learn2earn8 @ Jul 3 2013, 10:56 AM)
if not mistaken, at tat time, there were rumour klia would be built somewhere there
furthermore, its so outskirt, but those speculator really taken in by the advertisement song 'wat a wonderful world'
since investment is abt locationx3. those speculators did not follow the criteria and was zombified
klse, repco and most other shares were above RM100, the goodie-goodie days
most co borrow or max out loan and pledge their shares
well then, there is alwiz good and bad times. share mkt very liquid, so fast up,fast down. not same for props
so can hav your examples of those props which collapse, which area and etc during those downturn

How about location of Cygal plaza at Federal highway, Jalan Pantai Baru and Sprint highway junction?
QUOTE(Anon_1986 @ Jul 3 2013, 12:38 AM)
I am not exactly sure where we disagree, and perhaps I simply misunderstand you. I do acknowledge that my knowledge is as yet "half baked", hence my need to resort to forums such as this for ideas.
With regard to tapering, the Fed has been remarkably consistent with past pronouncements thus far, even with respect to controversial policies, and it has been a key part of recent Fed policy to communicate clearly its intentions and to follow through in order to guide market expectations to respond rationally. I think the tapering will occur as stated, even if only for the sake of consistency, but the details may vary depending on how the economy reacts. This is more an issue of political science than economics, and is subject to even greater guesswork and uncertainty than the murky field of economics.
I am in total agreement with you that Malaysia's property market bull run is essentially a credit bubble which is slowly running out of so called greater fools. Common sense dictates that when loan growth outstrips GDP, the excess money created is directed towards pushing up asset prices.
BNM statistics (http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=en_publication_catalogue&pg=en_publication_msb&tpt=bnm_2011&mth=5&yr=2013&lang=en&eId=box1) shows that in the past 5 years, quarterly residential property loans have doubled, and quarterly non-residential property loans properties tripled. In order for prices to continue rising at the same pace as the past 5 years, we need the same rate of loan growth. I don't see how that's likely to happen considering that household debt is bursting at its seams.
Nevertheless, where I disagree with the DDD camp is that bubbles such as this need not end in a burst. If there is no needleprick to jumpstart the cycle of fear and paranoia, and prices may simply stagnate. You must agree that, unlike most other asset markets, property prices tend to be sticky downwards. Prof Keen lost a bet when he predicted that the Australian Property bubble would burst back in around 2007-2008. Your analogy involving speculators depends on how many speculators there are relative to the greater pool of investors. The anecdotal evidence suggests that there are many, but there are no numbers out there to know for sure.
From 2008 to 2012, Australian economy was saved by minerals boom. Hence, property price in outback actually increased.
The biggest concern in Malaysia are those marginal flippers who bought multiple DIBS units.
This post has been edited by icemanfx: Jul 3 2013, 02:54 PM