Webroot Spy Sweeper
Homepage: http://www.webroot.com/consumer/products/spysweeper
Download: http://www.webroot.com/consumer/downloads
This post has been edited by fru!tlo0p: May 3 2006, 12:31 AM
Anti-Spyware
Anti-Spyware
|
|
May 3 2006, 12:25 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
Webroot Spy Sweeper
Homepage: http://www.webroot.com/consumer/products/spysweeper Download: http://www.webroot.com/consumer/downloads This post has been edited by fru!tlo0p: May 3 2006, 12:31 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 3 2006, 12:50 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
eTrust PestPatrol Anti-Spyware Sunbelt CounterSpy Trend Micro Anti Spyware McAfee Anti Spyware sould b consider... |
|
|
Sep 26 2006, 03:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 01:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(mtrans @ Dec 22 2006, 01:00 AM) now i'm using spyware doctor latest version take only 7-10 minute on custom scan Newer version of SS has improved with it's scanning speed, personally i can notice the differencebefore that i use webroot spysweeper but it takes 30-60 minute for full scan. This post has been edited by fru!tlo0p: Dec 22 2006, 01:16 AM |
|
|
Dec 22 2006, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 26 2007, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(Yukaeshi @ Sep 25 2007, 10:24 PM) I have a combination of Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0, Spybot Search & Destroy and Ad-Aware 2007 as well as running on Windows Vista. I was told by a person in the Sony Style shop that Spybot and Ad-Aware isn't necessary since Vista has its built in Windows Defender, in fact, installing Spybot and Ad-Aware would increase the amount of spy/malware instead it wouldn't increase the amount of spyware, but the usage of ram. furthermore, you're running on Vista which consume higher resources, so end up will just lagging the system. perhaps u should enable protection from any 1 of them while keep the others for scanning purpose when necessaryHow true is this? This post has been edited by synz: Sep 26 2007, 12:54 AM |
|
|
Sep 26 2007, 02:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,642 posts Joined: Apr 2006 |
QUOTE(Yukaeshi @ Sep 26 2007, 01:19 PM) Thanks for the clarification it lies on the specs of your pc anyway. reducing programs that run in the background may lead to even better performance indeed |
| Change to: | 0.0155sec
0.40
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 04:35 AM |