seriously, in your every post you mentioned that cvt gearbox required maintenance every 20K km. where did you get your facts dude? And another thing is you complaining about high fc of sylphy but have you drove one before? The 8.9km/l is totally nonsense unless your car got problem or your right foot is really heavy.

He has been repeating this nonsensical comments in AW for hundreds of times (No jokes really in hundreds), no one listen to him anymore over there, thats why he shift his craps over here in LYF.

He is indeed king of repeating, didn't he talk about this over & over again in AW, really "Sam Tok Pei".  Lol...
The road r full of Forte EX only, since he said he worry the SX model push start might failed, that why he settled for cheaper EX kosong, can't tahan this joker.

I think his one is the 15" steel rim 

Knn... Even saga and myvi got high FC ma! Worry so much go ride a bicycle lah. Some more enviro friendly.

I doubt you own a Sylphy. Most of your responses here are pretty childish, as what you've shown yourself as an immature character over on the Autoworld forum.

Yes, this is known cases for honda city but not sylphy. From what I know for sylphy is 100k KM. I have confirmed this several time from authorised nissan SC.

I actually did asked SC several times but they said that is not necessary to change that soon. They insist that 100K km will be fine.  So which one should I listen to?

The honda city case was because they used the wrong fluid from what I heard, not because of the service interval.

Yes, agree Nissan makes great cars such as Skyline G25 sedan/coupe, US Sentra B16 and Altima L31/32. All the problem appears due with these local N-brand bunch garbage that brought in substandard alternative instead of the actual global market quality model wanted to get lowest cost and maximum revenue attempting to fool local buyers here with cheats and lies. No overheat issue in Nissan but under the hand of those bunch, there is jinx abnormal overheating issue happen to every 1 out of 10 owners in earlier certain models.

Sylphy is designed for Japan local market suited for their tax exemption and overpopulated city/housing roads. It is not a better car and not meant for export designed for lower income Japanese group that could not afford C-segment due to very high cost of ownership. Toyota Axio is designed for the same purpose and that is why they don't really export this model. We get Altis whereas European get Auris, both are quality car for global market regardless of which you choose.

Our local bunch seized this opportunity to bring in Sylphy instead of Sentra B16 that replaced our Sentra N16. C-segment in 2006 onwards have upsized from 1690mm width to >1750mm and wheelbase extended from 2500mm to >2600mm.

Because of very low assembly cost similar to quality Japanese B-segment only, they decided to bring in Sylphy and think they could sell at quality Japanese made pricing RM112k-116k in 2008 where Lancer GL cost RM110k and GT at RM115k, Altis 1.8L at RM112k-118k while Civic 1.8 RM112k, 2.0L at RM120k+. They think people will buy Sylphy because it's Japanese made but sales didn't turn out well, this is where they came up with Lightfoot gimmick to back its 16km/L city FC claim and gave CRA2Y result getting over 20km/L in Sylphy. Many cheated by the ad and Lightfoot result, went for Sylphy instead of Altis, Lancer and Civic and their sales beaten Altis off the chart for few months. When got the car, FC 16km/L can't achieve unless on highway 100% without jam. Normal city driving 8.9km/L and highway with traffic 12-14km/L. Interior so narrow, can't fit 3 adults behind. Even B-segment Vios and Latio can give more interior width space.

After they done with Sylphy then came Teana J32 instead of Altima L32. Another cost cutting car with width of just 1795mm and it's not even sports sedan. Older Mazda 6 has 1795mm because it is a sports sedan, same goes to US Altima L32 with similar width where their interior are not as big as Camry as they do not forgo safety standard with thicker pillars, frames and aerodynamic meant for sporty drive rather than family car. Even Japanese phased out the Teana early despite being designed for Japan local market. You could figure why those N-brand bunch bring this in.

Korean cars are much stable and because you don't feel fast, you think it's underpowered. Teana/Sylphy, they came up with more sensitive accelerator plate to give you the impression that it is very powerful in which, it is not. Meaning that you press 1/4 on Sylphy/Teana accelerator equals 1/3 pedals on Korean and conti cars already.

You want to be frog under the shade and shun knowledge especially safety, up to you. But don't go and prevent others from sharing info. Exora & Innova, both are not proper MPV for global market, therefore no comment. You want to talk about midi-MPV, kindly refer Toyota Wish/Verso, Kia Carens 2013, Mazda 5, Ford C-Max. Ok?

Altis '08/10 is about to phase out. At their time, they are qualified to be C-segment though legroom is less than Lancer. By overall, its width, length, wheelbase and height are qualified to be C-segment. Sylphy width 1695mm is B-segment, not qualified to be C-segment in the first place. Teana only 1795mm and not even a sports sedan is not qualified to be D-segment neither. Some C-segment are as wide as that and even wider also got. Sylphy can't even swerve safely cruising on highway. Does it mean you are willing to pay RM120k for C-segment that is so narrow at 1695mm and drive on left lane at 60km/h on 110km/h speed limit wide 3-lane highway?

Honda City '03 has poor legroom. If yours is Honda City '08, that legroom is just average but headroom is terribly low at the back. Civic rear headroom also bad as they wanted to focus on aerodynamic.