Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 2013 New Teana 2.5L v6 or Madza 6 2.0 L, Which is worth to buy ?

views
     
gangnamboleh
post Jul 11 2013, 08:40 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(jayraptor @ Jul 7 2013, 01:39 AM)
Korean cars are much stable and because you don't feel fast, you think it's underpowered. Teana/Sylphy, they came up with more sensitive accelerator plate to give you the impression that it is very powerful in which, it is not.

You want to be frog under the shade and shun knowledge especially safety, up to you. But don't go and prevent others from sharing info.

Altis '08/10 is about to phase out. At their time, they are qualified to be C-segment though legroom is less than Lancer. By overall, its width, length, wheelbase and height are qualified to be C-segment. Sylphy width 1695mm is B-segment, not qualified to be C-segment in the first place. Teana only 1795mm and not even a sports sedan is not qualified to be D-segment neither. Some C-segment are as wide as that and even wider also got. Sylphy can't even swerve safely cruising on highway.
*
Jraptor is quite spot on. At least he said legroom is lesser in Altis. Another point he said is sensitive plate to give power impression. notworthy.gif
gangnamboleh
post Jul 25 2013, 10:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
QUOTE(hondafan @ Jul 11 2013, 01:49 PM)
I don't agree about the sensitive plate at all because normal NA engine is used to behalf this way, just like most of the Japanese or even the conti also the same, but if turbo charged and super charged, then the pedal will also be different. But please don't use a NA engine compare to the Turbo charged engine and then said the Japanese give a much sensitive accelerator to make it like more power, this is not true at all.
*
Ok the later is not correct then.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2535sec    0.45    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:04 AM