I can surf net using abn but as usual vpn cannot

thr nothing to do with port foward all these thing

check with ur IT.

PPTP is for vpn client not mean for enterprise VPN.

u know what is port forward is for? thr no point u do port foward as ur public ip will keep changing

pls get ur fact right before u talk

I belive him because he is abnxcess user while you is not... can u really confirm abn vpn can because according to users abn cannot port forwarding at all so cant vpn is quite possible

ABN also use almost same thick of RG6 cable ,but the real wire maybe just a-pen-thick ,and how thick the cable is ,the service will not improve in any aspect .

at night my 1080p youtube not smooth anymore. need to buffer. its strange for 10mbps

Sorry for the late quoting, but just to let you know that current docsis cable (even for docsis2.0) can carry more  bandwidth compared to 2.4Gbps GPON cable, but it is often overselled 

Here the frequency allocation:

Docsis 3.0 downstream spec starts from 108Mhz to 1.002Ghz. Upstream from 5Mhz to 85Mhz.

Docsis 2.0 downstream spec starts from 88Mhz to 860Mhz. Upstream from 5Mhz to 42Mhz.

Typically for docsis 2.0, each customer were given 6MHz of bandwidth (for downstream), with a therotical speed 38Mbps (with overhead: 42.88Mbps)

with the spectrum of 88Mhz to 860Mhz (im not sure why they start with 88mhz), the total bandwidth should be 772MHz, which should accommodate at most 128 (6MHz) channel with full bandwidth in bits/s of 4864Mbit/s (128x38 Mhz) for both internet and catv usage (i believe catv take lesser than 6Mhz/channel), Im sure abn are using docsis3.0 spectrum in order to support of 50Mbits package (which required 2 bonding of 6 MHz channel). But the problem most likely lies of the Active optical network that carry on all the bandwidth from the docsis distribution cable and how they managed the routing of the packets. I'm not saying GPON is bad distribution as it have more advantage since fiber cable is really thin cable (can easily carry alot of fiber nodes in one distribution cable) and shared only to 32 users per gpon cable(as for TM, most likely per cable, they only shared less than 16 users,my house only area use 8 users/per gpon cable).With docsis 3.0, 24 channel of 6 MHz can be used for bonding which given 1Gbps of bandwidth, but ISP wont stupidly assigned 144MHz just for a customer, so 4 channel is max for one customer. Both of the required technology are subjected for improvement (for more speed) (e.g docsis 3.1 support 200MHz spectrum, with much less channel spacing (20 kHz to 50 kHz wide, instead of 6MHz), of course GPON are subject for improvement as well). By the way, I dont think docsis 3.1 is backward compatible with older docsis version due to smaller channel spacing, so every customer(even for the exisitng users that dont need the extra bandwidth) need to be provided with new modem in order to use their existing internet package, and thats the reason why we hardly heard the adoption of docsis3.1 even in abang besar america, because the cost involvement is really high as the existing hardware need to be changed completely (even for customers who doesn't need it)

So , they offer RM70 for 5Mbps unlimited data + 50 channel?

Is this true unlimited with no capped ? Or later somewhat fair usage policy , 2GB high speed limit then 128kbps.

Someone using ?

Being glad about unifi is like being glad that you choose to eat cow poop over human poop. Sure you can force yourself eat cow poop over human poop, but poop is a poops

Unifi is at best meh~ average, but dem, unifi is like ABN if compares to other 1st world country ISPs (and I used VIP20 for 2 years before downgrade to VIP5 because of financial problem). Especially to those who have tasted other 1st worlder ISPs and now have to use m'sian interweb.

as u know the government knows internet is our alternate media. so yea maybe they actually trying to limit the amount of people using internet, also putting expensive prices hoping that many would not be able to afford it.