QUOTE(Kizarh @ May 25 2013, 02:55 AM)
It's cheap, reliable, easy to use and usually get the job done. What's more you ask for a better weapon 

Military Thread V9, Happy birthday Malaysia & ATM ke 50 & 80
|
|
May 25 2013, 12:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 25 2013, 01:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(azriel @ May 25 2013, 09:03 AM) PT. Pindad's 6X6 Tarantula is based on the Doosan DST Black Fox.September 10 2011, The Jakarta Post ( Source ) QUOTE Defense Minister Purnomo Yusgiantoro said both state weaponry maker PT Pindad and Busan Ltd would jointly produce armored Anoa Tarantula tanks. "Indonesia will produce 11 units of Tarantula panzers; South Korea will make another 11 units," said Purnomo on Friday as quoted by Antara news wire. PT Pindad president director Adik Avianto Soedarsono said the Anoa Tarantula panzer would adopt the technology from Doosan DST. It will be armed with a Belgian-made 90mm canon. 22 units seem to be small …. especially for local production….no economy of scale SK MND Press Release 21 May 2013 as quoted in Defence Studies ( Source ) QUOTE Localization of heavy armored wheeled vehicle Doosan DST exports to Indonesia A heavy armored wheeled vehicle (6X6) built with our own technology will be exported to Indonesia. Doosan DST signed a heavy armored wheeled vehicle contract in 2009 with the Indonesian army and commenced production of these vehicles in November 2011. After carrying out operational tests along with firing and field maneuvering tests starting in early 2012, Doosan DST announced on 5 May that the production of its 6X6 heavy armored wheeled vehicle has been completed in early May 2013. Prior to this announcement, DAPA officials, Indonesian inspectors, and affiliated companies held a roll-out ceremony on 2 May for the heavy armored wheeled vehicle (name for the Indonesian army: Tarantula 6X6) that will be delivered to the Indonesian army. The number of heavy armored wheeled vehicles that will be delivered to the Indonesian army. Doosan DST is responsible for manufacturing the armored vehicle and assembling the turret. Also, an Indonesian arms factory will assemble SKD-type armored vehicles on site in Indonesia. The 6X6 heavy armored wheeled vehicles that will be delivered until the end of the year are 18 tons in weight and can hold 3 crew (driver, tank commander, gunner). Its top speed on ground is 100km per hour and can reach speeds up to 8km in the water. The heavy armored wheeled vehicles that will be exported have been manufactured tailored to the Indonesian terrain and thus is lighter and can be operated in the water. Also, by arming these vehicles with a 90mm main gun and a 7.62mm machine gun, these vehicles possess the fire power capable of attacking dense enemy units as well as enemy tanks. At the same time, they are known as combat armored vehicles that can be operated for guerilla search and destroy operations. Doosan DST also exported the K200A1 tracked armored vehicle to Malaysia for the first time in ROK history in 1993. According to Army Recognition, Indonesia will put the CSE-90 turret from Belgium. The CSE-90 is the same turret that we use on our SIBMAS. Probably because it's being used by Indonesian's Army Scorpion and Marines PT-76 and AMX-10 or cost constraint. This post has been edited by noavatar: May 25 2013, 02:07 PM |
|
|
May 25 2013, 04:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ May 25 2013, 04:03 PM) £2 billion Spanish navy submarine will sink to bottom of sea » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Wasn't the Scorpene jointly developed by DCNS and Navantia? This post has been edited by noavatar: May 25 2013, 04:51 PM |
|
|
May 25 2013, 05:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
The solution is to make it slimmer or longer: QUOTE Miscalculations by engineers at Navantia, the construction company contracted to build the S-80 submarine fleet, have produced submarines that are each as much as 100 tonnes (110 US tonnes) too heavy. The excess weight sounds paltry compared to the 2,000-plus tonnes (2,205 US tonnes) that each submarine weighs, but it’s more than enough to send the submarines straight to the ocean’s floor. Given the mistake, Spain is going to have to choose between two costly fixes: slimming the submarines down, or elongating them to compensate for the extra fat. All signs point to the latter, which will be anything but a breeze—adding length will still require redesigning the entire vessel. And more money on top of the $680 million already spent. Spain’s defense ministry, the government arm responsible for overseeing the project, has yet to say how much the setback will cost in both time and money. But Navantia has already estimated that its mistake will set the project back at least one or, more likely, two years. And the Spanish edition of European news site The Local reported that each additional meter added to the S-80s, already 71 meters in length, will cost over $9 million. Source |
|
|
May 25 2013, 05:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
DCNS and Navantia ended their cooperation in 2010
QUOTE DCNS, Navantia part ways on submarines Published: Nov. 15, 2010 PARIS, Nov. 15 (UPI) -- Diesel-electric submarine-makers DCNS of France and Navantia of Spain are ending cooperation after failure of arbitration to resolve differences. DCNS will solely produce the Scorpene submarine while Navantia will produce its S80 vessel, DCNS said in a statement. "DCNS and Navantia have put an end to their disagreement concerning their submarine collaboration," DCNS said in a statement. "As a result, the arbitration procedure between them will be terminated. "Scorpene submarines will from now on be built and marketed by DCNS. Similarly, S80 submarines will be built and marketed by Navantia. "Neither party will make any further comments," it said. DefenseNews reported the two companies had shared development and construction of the Scorpene submarine but relations between DCNS and Navantia deteriorated after Navantia started a program to build the S80 submarine. The S80 is larger than the Scorpene and is based on a new design that includes air independent propulsion, a land-attack cruise missiles and a Lockheed Martin combat management system. |
|
|
May 25 2013, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 25 2013, 05:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 25 2013, 06:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
![]() |
|
|
May 26 2013, 02:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(hafizushi @ May 25 2013, 09:05 PM) what happen to the thais aircraft carrier mind to share? From wiki: for me dokdo class, rmn should only look at it when we have enough budget to buy it. But currently we are lacking army transport type of ship and operational frigate QUOTE Chakri Naruebet is usually only operational for a single day per month for training, with the rest of the time spent alongside as a "part-time tourist attraction". The ship rarely leaves the proximity of the Sattahip naval base, and when she does, it is usually to transport and host the Royal Family of Thailand. Naval commentators consider Chakri Naruebet to be less an aircraft carrier and more the world's most expensive royal yacht, while the Thai media have nicknamed the ship "Thai-tanic", and consider her to be a white elephant. The only operation she did is for flood relief. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTMS_Chakri_Naruebet At the time of ordering Thailand was an "Asian Tiger" , then the Asian Financial Crisis hit and all of a sudden they couldn't afford to operate what they had already ordered. ![]() Chakri Naruebet with Kitty Hawk It’s still operational but hardly goes to sea as it is costly to do so. So now the intended naval 'force-multiplier' has become sort of just the Royal Thai yacht (there are apartments for the Thai royal family)…and part-time tourist attraction ( don’t miss buying a cap with HTMS Chakri Nabuet on it). The officers' uniforms make the aircraft carrier more colourful. They don red, yellow, green, purple and white uniforms. ![]() It saw action in January 2003, when anti-Thai riots were sparked in Phnom Penh by incorrect news reports of a claim by a Thai actress that the Angkor Wat temple complex belonged to Thailand, not Cambodia. Chakri Naruebet was sent to help with any evacuation of Thai citizens from Cambodia. Another time it saw action was during the filming of Rescue Dawn, about US Navy pilot Dieter Dengler and his capture during the Vietnam War, the flight deck of CHAKRI NARUEBET was used to represent the carrier USS RANGER. But in any real action it will be any naval commander’s wet dream target ship. The self-defense armament includes four close defense Meroka systems and six chaff decoy launchers. For offensive weapons, the ship relies on the capabilities of her embarked aircraft. For anti-submarine defense, she relies upon the detection capacity and attacks of her ASW helicopters. |
|
|
May 26 2013, 03:11 AM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
VERA passive radiolocator (in Czech known as Věra) is an electronic support measures (ESM) system that uses measurements of time difference of arrival (TDOA) of pulses at three or four sites to accurately detect and track airborne emitters. It is sometimes incorrectly referred to in the media as a radar. ![]() |
|
|
May 26 2013, 03:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 26 2013, 03:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
![]() |
|
|
May 26 2013, 03:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
![]() |
|
|
May 26 2013, 04:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 26 2013, 04:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
M1's main gun fires Sabot for anti tank, HEAT (High-explosive anti-tank) for APC, CAN (M1028 canister) for anti infantry/structure and MPAT (Multi-Purpose Anti-Tank) for slow moving air targets and ground fortifications.
This post has been edited by noavatar: May 26 2013, 04:29 AM |
|
|
May 26 2013, 04:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
|
|
May 26 2013, 12:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Different types of rounds vs a T-55 turret Part 1
![]() (4) several hits and penetrations of 57mm armour piercing rounds. A small angle of impact has caused a ricochet. ![]() (5) Typical impacts of different High Explosive Fragmentation shells. The lower one is a hit by a 57mm (HE) shell. The upper one is a hit by a 100mm (HE) shell, no penetration has occurred. The larger calibre hit has caused a breakage of the welding seams between the rear wall and roof armour of the turret. (2) Main Battle Tank T55 100mm armour piercing round (100 APCBC). Hit, no penetration due to small angle of impact. ![]() (1) Main Battle Tank T55 100mm armour piercing round (100 APCBC). Hit and penetration. (3) Light recoilless rifle (55S55) of Finnish origin, Two hits and penetrations. ![]() (6) 57mm Armour Piercing ammunition, no penetration due to the armour thickness and small angle of impact. (8) hits and penetrations by the recoilless rifle HEAT ammunition. |
|
|
May 26 2013, 01:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
Different types of rounds vs a T-55 turret Part 2
![]() (7) Several hits by 100mm tank gun HEAT rounds. Note a much larger penetration hole in comparison to the recoilless rifle HEAT penetrations (Position 8), tracks left on the surface by the fragments and impact of the shells stabilizing wings. ![]() (7) Several hits by 100mm tank gun HEAT rounds. (6) Hits by 57mm Armour Piercing ammunition, no penetration due to the armour thickness and small angle of impact. ![]() (4) and (10) several hits and penetrations of 57mm armour piercing rounds. Some rounds have inflicted a bigger penetration hole than the calibre due to the breaking of the armour. A small angle of impact has caused a ricochet in one case. (5) Typical impacts of different High Explosive Fragmentation shells. The lower one is a hit by a 57mm (HE) shell. The upper one is a hit by a 100mm (HE) shell, no penetration has occurred. ![]() (1) Main Battle Tank T55 100mm armour piercing round (100 APCBC). Hit and penetration. (9) Hit by the 100mm tank gun HEAT ammunition directly to the penetration hole left by the 100mm kinetic armour piercing round. This post has been edited by noavatar: May 26 2013, 01:04 PM |
|
|
May 26 2013, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
QUOTE(azriel @ May 26 2013, 12:05 PM) According to IHS/JaneQUOTE Under the terms of a "draft defence industry protocol" signed at the International Defence Industry Fair (IDEF) in Istanbul earlier this month, the countries will co-develop the vehicle to meet the requirements of their respective armed forces. A contract to mass produce the vehicle, which is likely to be based on Turkish designs, has not yet been secured and will be subject to further discussion. The Indonesia-Turkey protocol also outlines the joint development of a software-defined radio (SDR) system, which is also subject to contractual discussion, and encourages a strengthening of defence industrial relations through exchanges of information and technologies as well as exploring other areas of potential collaboration "based on mutual benefit". The industrial programme - which is likely to be headed by Indonesia's PT Pindad and Turkey's FNSS Defence Systems, a joint venture between Turkey's Nurol Holding and BAE Systems - aims to deliver a prototype within one year of commencing development of the vehicle. Should the production programme go ahead, the vehicle will also be marketed to third-party countries. The programme to develop the SDR system will be led by PT Len and Aselsan. |
|
|
May 26 2013, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]()
Newbie
0 posts Joined: Mar 2013 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0443sec
0.55
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:58 PM |