Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Proton Suprima, New Perdana Based on Accord?

views
     
SUSkimsim
post Apr 25 2013, 07:20 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


After launch it car and do you prefer over an inspira to instead of this unknown performance engine smile.gif

At lease inspira engine still an Mitsubishi one.
SUSkimsim
post Apr 25 2013, 08:40 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(ericmaxman @ Apr 25 2013, 08:13 AM)
Learn to research la bangsat.

http://paultan.org/2005/07/08/the-petronas-e01/

Technical Specifications
Valve mechanism: Continuous Control VVT (Variable Valve Timing)
Camshaft: Double OverHead Camshaft (DOHC)
Displacement: 2 litres
Induction: Natural Aspirated
Cylinders: 4, In-line
Valves per cylinder: 4
Block: Aluminum
Weight: 108.9kg
Max Horsepower: 204.3 PS @ 7300rpm
Max Torque: 203Nm @ 5300rpm
Power Output per litre: 100 PS/litre
Volumetric Efficiency: 107.8%
Emission Standards: EURO 2

True that it's only EURO2, but that was WAY BACK in 2005. Like what the rest said, Proton could likely improve the engine to meet with current standard.

And it's also a known fact that the Inspira is using a Campro 2.0.
*
Nice~~~ look like really STP = standard tapi power smile.gif
SUSkimsim
post Apr 25 2013, 08:44 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Just take a look and how does it fuel saving & pulling the power.
SUSkimsim
post Apr 25 2013, 12:19 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(stix @ Apr 25 2013, 12:17 PM)
and if they sell it at 100k, another doomed to fail project. if they sell it 80k, preve will fail. its a dead end.  ohmy.gif
*
The worst case is sell over 100k do u think you will support it?
SUSkimsim
post Apr 25 2013, 03:11 PM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(neo1point3 @ Apr 25 2013, 02:58 PM)
Im using cfe engine, in town use such a pain the a$$ to pay for its fuel. Full tank 370km more or less.

Long distance, i have record 640km travel at average speed of 130km/h. Still have little bit more fuel until the low fuel warning indicator light up

its the way the ecu tune. Proton need to learn from other manufacture how to tune properly. The ecu tune before remap have better fc than the latest
*
You ride on what model of proton car?
I think it is normal for smaller CC car.

Hp & torque are low then have to pulling up power fuel to burning over.
SUSkimsim
post Apr 26 2013, 07:49 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


OMG --> http://paultan.org/2013/04/25/proton-supri...n-honda-accord/

Honda accord much headache for maintenance and now come into proton hand... Lagi headache for after sales service smile.gif

The main issue is accord chassis too heavy and now putting unknown performance engine and do your think it can be more improve FC and power?

This post has been edited by kimsim: Apr 26 2013, 07:55 AM
SUSkimsim
post Apr 26 2013, 09:21 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(dirtinacan @ Apr 26 2013, 09:15 AM)
at least roadtax rm90 for 1.6l car.. 1.8 already feel pain.. rm280.haha
*
Due to road tax is a year a time.
Badly FC is per every fuel.

So you would consider which one?
SUSkimsim
post Apr 26 2013, 09:40 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


QUOTE(matmoto5125 @ Apr 26 2013, 09:28 AM)
I got 3 questions:

1. Why P1 doesn't play around with their displacement of the 1.6 CFE? Just like Ford did with its new 1.0 & 1.5 EcoBoost lineup.
2. Why P1 doesn't use the so-called Preve/Exora modular platform design?
3. Why P1 is yet to announce its so-called "business plan"?
*
This is the main pointed.

Why proton need play with from each model of car can be choose from low or higher engine grade.

Why they can't do all the same and different with accessories of the low & full specs only.

The main reason from each company have to developing and take how long for improve over bad FC to be better FC and high power engine with lower capacity.

This one may need bump in how much money to be devolping again.
Take more 20 years should be good enough time.

Like Korean car last time very worst and now improve a lot the better FC already.
SUSkimsim
post Apr 27 2013, 01:46 AM

Let Me ❤️ You
*******
Senior Member
5,847 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
From: Malaysia 🇲🇾


Don't understand of proton, why they need to copy other brand of technology,since they have lotus and just ask lotus for developing a good engine for proton.

Since proton know how to design & built of Waja, Persona, saga Blm, Exora & Preve then "y" they don't design by original from proton and still need to used other brand for rebadge it.

Now become a Rojak Rojak again.

This post has been edited by kimsim: Apr 27 2013, 01:48 AM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0156sec    0.28    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 06:13 AM