Was the ban not fair? In your humble opinion? And why?

It does because he's a Liverpool player. He is being punished.

And what do you mean by the club and the fans being punished? I thought only Suarez is being punished?

In my opinion, with the history that he has, Liverpool should've known better and know how to deal with him.

I'll take an example, Cantona was banned for months over his Crystal Palace incident while Rio shared the same fate when he failed to take the drug test. They made the mistake and they went through it. Suarez should do so. And it was not even a professional foul.

What the heck?

I am discussing with you maturely. You are the one that easily ticked off.

Well, I dont know about Defoe's bite issue, care to enlighten when and where?

In Suarez's case, it is found that he is guilty. Like I said, it was not a professional foul. And I didn't even go to his attempt on hand of god.

One of your colleagues did mentioned that it is no surprise that he is banned for 10 matches due to his previous 'saga'.


On Cantona, I am not saying that he was not guilty and I agree it was far much serious than Suarez's.

On Rio, he only didnt attend for a mere drug test and banned for months. On this one, I would say that Suarez's case is far much worse.

On paying wages and bla bla bla, that is something the club has to live with. If you wanted fair, go ask Suarez. Not the commissioning body that punishes him. I don't understand why you blame FA instead of Suarez himself.

To be fair, I have met a lot of people like you also.