QUOTE(koolspyda @ Jun 2 2013, 02:25 PM)
As towards the end of the campaign, we showed WE CAN play without Suarez but isn't it better to have THAT option (with/witout) then to rely only on how we fared the last 5-6 games?
Rodger needs to think of the best interest for Liverpoolfc (winning), not for lfc's healthy bank account (at the moment on suarez's sale) Call me insensitive that's the bloody reason why we probably slacked (being on the top) for taking affairs of the players feelings to heart.
When it comes to our bank account, I doubt Rodgers has the final say. All he can do is to convince FSG not to consider any offers for him, or at least not yet.
Let's try to look at it from FSG's perspective. You've just received an offer between 2-3 times what you paid for a bloke who :-
1) Will at some point want to move to Spain
2) Gets himself suspended each season
3) Is unhappy and is blaming everyone including the PM
Is it worth the risk? If we turn this offer down, will there be a better offer in the future?
I imagine that's what they're considering.
Personally I want him to stay but not if his heart isn't in it anymore. Look how Torres' form took a plunge the moment he started sulking. I'm with John Barnes on this. If he's unhappy, there's no point in forcing him to stay. We may as well cash in and bankroll someone (or two) who wants to play at the club. Sure we aren't in the CPL but that's still a sizeable amount to place a bid for a player. True we can adopt Shankly's, "that's Liverpool's knee" approach but I am not confident Suarez will respond well to being held hostage. We all know how petulant he can be despite having immense talent.