Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 New tyre to the front or to the rear.., Your choice....

views
     
TSBuFung
post Mar 30 2013, 05:59 PM, updated 13y ago

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


Let's make ur choice and we discuss it out later after we collect enough answer....

Thanks...

This can be a general knowledge for all....

This post has been edited by BuFung: Mar 30 2013, 06:00 PM
TSBuFung
post Mar 30 2013, 06:06 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


You may also tell ur reason why put it in front or rear...
TSBuFung
post Mar 30 2013, 06:27 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


Ya... Most of us think newer tyre should be in front. The actual fact is the better grip tyre shall be in rear....

This is more important than you have any ESP/vsc in ur car....

Hope thread get pin and others aware of this...
TSBuFung
post Apr 1 2013, 12:46 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


another debate I would like to discuss is... is shorter car like those B-segment really require VSC/ESP.... since a shorter car, chances of loosing the rear is lower...
TSBuFung
post Apr 1 2013, 03:57 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Apr 1 2013, 03:33 PM)
How short is short? You must calculate the wheelbase length and not the length of the whole car (including the front and rear overhangs). The wheelbase of b-segment cars are not really that much shorter than a larger C-segment. The short overhangs on the b-segment makes it look like a shorter vehicle.

A shorter wheelbase car will have less chances of losing the rear and that is correct but you have to be so so so so so so so much shorter. The only thing that comes to mind is actually the Smartfortwo. That car would have very little chances of losing the rear as it drives like a go-kart. Other B-segments cars will lose the rear just as easily when you lose control and that is where VSC/ESP/ETC/ABC/123 will come in handy (but not a guaranteed) to help stabilise the car.
*
not just the wheelbase, the weight distribution also have to take into consideration..

law of physic, still count.. the shorter it is, the chance are lower....
TSBuFung
post Apr 1 2013, 04:05 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


it is good to see more n more discussion going on here...
TSBuFung
post Apr 1 2013, 04:56 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


QUOTE(sleepwalker @ Apr 1 2013, 04:52 PM)
Maybe I should not use 'drifting' as an example otherwise everybody thinks that a longer wheelbase car is oversteering into every corner.

It's more about the feel of the car, something quite difficult to explain on the Internet. A longer wheelbase car is more resistant to turning. You feel that you have to work harder to make it turn and once it turns, it is more difficult to change to the opposite direction (for example if you are entering a left corner that goes into a right corner).
*
easy... just compare a car vs a truck in turning corner....
TSBuFung
post Apr 1 2013, 07:16 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
8,407 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


the poll still tie... sweat.gif sweat.gif sweat.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0582sec    0.66    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 07:14 PM