Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The New Mazda 6 V3, Calling all owners/fans to come here!!!

views
     
net_cow
post Oct 11 2013, 02:53 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Kerry1136 @ Oct 10 2013, 10:19 PM)
Guys want some opinion here.

Am currently driving a MK6 Golf, decided to change to M6 2.0

What you guys think in terms of handling, comfort, driving etc..

Budget is around 150k'ish that is why I was looking at this segment plus the design is nice.
*
why are you downgrading shocking.gif
net_cow
post Oct 14 2013, 10:04 AM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Kerry1136 @ Oct 12 2013, 04:34 PM)
Way out of budget bro. If I can dish out that much I will go for A200.

Back to topic, is 2.0 underpower in terms of power and how is the comfort ability and feature wise? Recommended to buy 2.0?
*
i thought you are on GTI blush.gif
im on 2.0, not exactly underpowered, adequate for normal usage.
power coming in at higher RPM band which is from 4K onwards.
dont expect euro comfort, m6 is more on good handling
feature? get 2.5 if dont want regret sweat.gif tongue.gif

net_cow
post Oct 14 2013, 03:33 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(Kerry1136 @ Oct 14 2013, 01:47 PM)
Thanks. I did went to test drive and well I have my own personal opinions so I won't be posting any feedback here due to respect.

Thanks much guys really appreciate it. Will evaluate sometime next year since I heard there will be a CKD launch and Mazda 3 2.0 Edition next month.
*
please elaborate your feedback tongue.gif would like to know more comment hehe
i doubt you want anything CKD, put JDM quality into consideration wub.gif
oh yea, m3 is another good choice given the interior is much better than m6 doh.gif

net_cow
post Apr 26 2014, 05:54 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(T_flash @ Apr 23 2014, 12:42 AM)
so what's the darkest tinting option for Mazda 6??? Front 3M Crystalline 70 for front and nano 40s on the side??? or better go with other brand?

Will JPJ pass this?
*
Mine front crystalline 50, the rest colorshade 30, dark enough to pass all roadblock tongue.gif

This post has been edited by net_cow: Apr 26 2014, 05:55 PM
net_cow
post Apr 30 2014, 03:58 AM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


come join us once you register at facebook group. dont be shy ya. icon_rolleyes.gif

QUOTE
user posted image

net_cow
post Jul 5 2014, 12:46 AM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(newcomer9747 @ Jun 3 2014, 10:41 PM)
already made booking and loan approved. now waiting for number plate and road tax and insurance. can't wait for the car. the fb admins seems very stuck up, i pm both ppl also no response. i think f*** them and create a new group la. mazda 6 only wanna action like they drive ferrari.
*
its a community group which exactly same those charity house, create own manage without anyone paying.
btw the group is strictly for owner that had gotten the car for ease of management.
you only wait for couple of weeks, i waited 6 months to get my car and by then only allow to join the group.

please take note on your behaviour for creating non existence mess.
net_cow
post Mar 8 2015, 12:42 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(thefryingfox @ Feb 21 2015, 09:51 PM)
tested the six today. planning to take the 2.5 l variant but i am very disspointed with the engine. its just feels that it was not paired accurately and due to the weight of the body, the 2.5 liter strugles.
decided to cancel my plan and wait for something else to come out. currently driving an IS 250
*
Bro, NVH wise IS250 is much better. You can't compare a V6 and 4 cylinder. Linear acceleration definitely better on a V6 unless the 4pot is turbocharged. Going to mazda6 from IS250 is only a segment upgrade. BTW you may want to try the car with ron97 and higher rpm during test drive. Less than 1.5tonne for a D-segment is consider light.

QUOTE(ymtong @ Feb 21 2015, 10:17 PM)
Totally agree, the gear ratio is not in correct setting. I'm driving the 2.5 now, regret to buy this worst CBU Mazda 6 skyactiv. I have sent in  service center 6 times less then one year but BERMAZ can't solve the lower arm bush sound problem.
My advice, think twice before u decide to buy this.
*
Bro, please read up the technology and foundation behind the build of SKYACTIV. Japanese engineer build the gear ratio and low rpm meant for fuel saving and reduce fatigue during long stop and go drive.

QUOTE(ymtong @ Feb 22 2015, 07:41 PM)
It not even meet uncle driving style, if u hv tested u should know the performance.
with a bit of up hill (2-3°) at 20-30km speed, if u want to overtake with full press the pedal, the car need 3-4sec only can feel it start moving fast, unless u press until the "kick-in" button but you will at 1st gear with 6000rpm, this really can't acceptable. It worst than my ex Sylphy 2.0.
The gear ratio really not in correct setting, maybe ECU mapping may help but it will void warranty.
*
Mazda6 not meant for uncle car in the first place. Mazda philopshy always about drivers' car. Its not a turbocharged car so it don't meant to have high torque at low rpm. Have you driven TypeR? Low rpm sucks too. Maybe you can try a new tank of ron97 and drive it like with higher rpm range. Let say 3-6K rpm usage. To overtake you have to understand where is your max torque available at which rpm. Try have fun for a short drive driving above 3K rpm u may start to have fun with your 6.

QUOTE(ymtong @ Mar 8 2015, 10:54 AM)
@eng98 please use your head to talk instead of ass. Your words to me is Offencive
1. i have evidence that they can't solve my problem after sent to SC for 6times with same problem as at today and others problem as well.
2. how you know i can't afford?  Is that u worry I'm complaining this in public end up u can't sell your car and made u not afford to lost?
3. You compare a old gen Camry with new Mazda 6 2013 which not apple to apple. Am i compare Betly or Mercs?
4. I'm talking as a consumer rights, letter of demand is in proccess and waiting to court If they reject my demand. I won't stop here and willing to pay legal fees, will u do this if u not satisfied with the product or just silent.
5. This is the place to share info but not use offensive words to others.
*
No one here is insulting anyone. Please refrain yourself before calling out names. Bermaz had accepted the sound as part of design issue. Whether to be fixed with new parts, nobody know. You are going in and out of SC for 6 times and have immediate battery replacement by the SC. You are not leaving your car there for 6 months like some of the VW owner facing major issue. Problem may not be fixed but can be look at another angle for using the car. P/S: whoever bought Mazda no one care shit about the resell value. Its personal satisfaction of driving it daily.
net_cow
post Oct 12 2015, 11:14 AM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(sootienann @ Oct 12 2015, 12:06 AM)
kid, u really need to learn how to read specs. your linked reference shows that camry hybrid has a combined total of 200 bhp from its 2.5 liter engine and electric motor. and for sure it has a heck of a lot more torque than the 2.5 skyactiv. u should ban yourself from this forum for such an embaressing mistake.
as you yourself admitted, on fuel consumption "Of coz hybrid will win".
as you yourself admitted, on NVH "Ok, i let u win with this only point". and FYI good NVH is one of the main reason why most people buy a D segment Japanese sedan.
if people wanted sporty with good handling they would probably go for other segment cars.
so u admit that camry hybrid is good value for money ?
I mean rear passenger legroom and shoulder width and headroom. as before , good interior passenger space and storage compartments is one of the major factor to consider when buying a D segment japan sedan.
looks are subjective. I can also say camry looks young and sporty.
who are u to argue with me ? are u a famous car designer ? if no, then your opinion regarding looks counts for as little as my opinion.
camry has the ability to move at slow speeds with the engine off. so what features does mazda 6 have that camry doesn't have ?
ieloop ? don't make me laugh. ieloop capacitors contribute to maybe extra 0.1 km per liter fuel consumption?
so childish . I suspect u haven't got your drivers license yet.
19 inch rims come with its own set of problems when u encounter poor roads ,  bengkok rims, changing expensive new tyres , etc etc.
19 inch rim will have better handling. 17 inch will have better ride.
as before , better check your facts. camry hybrid is more powerful in the first place, so why would mazda 6 have a better power to weight ratio ? I haven't even start to discuss torque yet.
boring is subjective. no doubt camry its common on the road.
here comes the best part: nowhere did the article say that "mazda 6 win". are u telling lies here ? u better not lie here because I can quote you and quote the article verbatim.

or maybe your English is not good enough to understand the article , in which case u should go back to school
*
before you calling someone kid, you shall check the background of the posters or at least have the courtesy of reading back past two (almost three) version of mazda6 threads.

HP and Torque on paper are practically useless if you cant put all that on the road. If you can put Camry Hybrid torque on a twisting road to be used, i would say you are professional driver. However in real life, camry chassis is so dumb that it might skidded off the road if you wanted to fully utilized the torque. Actually the mazda6 2.0 already sufficient to beat hands down on both accord2.4 and camry hybrid 2.5 on a twisting road that required a lot of usable torque and the chassis balance.

NVH is never being a strong point of Japanese sedan, any euro D segment give you much more pleasure. But, please be reminded of CKD and CBU quality and finishing. You may not have any strong point to deny the perfectionist of the Japanese at Hiroshima in producing car, compare to local cheap labor assembling the car for you.

In term of fuel consumption, without Hybrid our friend here "fadzly" able to achieve up to 1000KM in one real full tank scenario. FC is about the way you drive, hybrid dont help you much if you drive like a maniac like me. Comparing what i'm getting 450+-KM per tank which is good, as i travelling 120-160kph regularly. Its way better than my turbo vios only achieving 250km per tank sweat.gif

19" is about handling and look (subjective) so its factory fitted unless you changed to 18" which is more balance between handling and FC. If you really do want talk about power to weight ratio, you may want to check for the facts mazda6 is much lighter and have similar torque/hp. Mathematical calculation already leaning towards to mazda6, if you put both on the road there goes your camry hybrid.

Not sure who telling lies, could be mazda pay hell-a-lot of money to the car magazine and reviewer to have NCAP 5 stars, best in term of handling, best in term of real FC, 0-100kph in 7.x seconds, finalist of World Car Design of the Year 2014, blah blah. though i cant find any track time test for camry hybrid, else i can compare it.

Design wise, i doubt anyone can tell you camry is beautiful. if you just want to bigger car with slight better NVH and comfort from point A to B.
Hence what general common people perception its an "uncle car"
net_cow
post Oct 12 2015, 12:16 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(sootienann @ Oct 12 2015, 11:40 AM)
so u get about 7km per liter during brisk highway cruise ? ouch.
is there any way to remove the 180 kmph speed cut for made in japan cars ?
*
you may want to tail me for a week to see how exactly i drive.
actually i suffer the FC due to upgrade of 18" RIM from 17". i can cope with 100KM less per tank given the superior handling on my 8jj 18"

QUOTE(digitalcode @ Oct 12 2015, 11:41 AM)
first time reading this thread, and all i see is fighting between 2 people. isn't this thread for mazda6 fans and owners? why do we need to compare to other cars? pls don't waste our time on this.
*
is call forum, where discussion taken place and knowledge being shared

QUOTE(sootienann @ Oct 12 2015, 12:04 PM)
when I say "glide in serene silence." I thought it was clear that I implied moving with the engine off. pls brush up your English.
didn't u feel very luxurious moving with the engine off ? no sound no vibration ?
*
well.......there is so many ppl of complaining the quieter F1 Hybrid Turbo and Formula-E. These applies to those on the road that common people might prefer the silence in the cabin. but for real car enthusiast, quiet is a bullshit thing to ask for. if you dont get orgasm from v6 turbo or v8, then you may prefer to get Camry Hybrid. of course im not saying noise from outside is the thing for orgasm tongue.gif
net_cow
post Oct 12 2015, 12:39 PM

|= c 0 w =| (tm)
*******
Senior Member
2,689 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(sootienann @ Oct 12 2015, 12:22 PM)
depends on how often u brake. if u always alternate between brake and accelerate rapidly definitely that takes a toll on fuel consumption. if just cruising at 120-160 that's a different story.
are u claiming that skyactiv 4 cylinder sings a nice tune ?
*
klang valley always one shit fella hogging the lane at 80kph at fast lane. you cant crusie 120-160kph long enough but enough for sprinting up to 160kph any time.

of course cant compare skyactiv 4cyc with v6 and v8 but did anyone complaint type-r 4cyc sound before?
i would say skyactiv 4cyc is the cheaper type-r 4cyc that allow you to rev up to 6.5K every gear shift or maintain at high RPM (3-6K)
due to EU emission control, the exhaust fck that silence the drone of high RPM 4cyc sound.

all this dont apply to a point A to B driver.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.8843sec    0.96    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 03:36 PM