Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> [WTComplain] Against Infinity(elite member), BEWARE

stevanistelrooy
post Apr 11 2006, 03:48 AM

Ten seconds you won't believe what's gonna happen.
Group Icon
VIP
2,450 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(accs_centre first post)
Now, he refused to refund full payment to me.. only 80%..He said it used to be the headphone feature for fade in,
fade out sound to adjust the sound level..in order to avoid too loud volumn to ur ears..
If really so, it is totally useless feature!! i believe such feature 9 over 10 ppl will complain against it..
It should adjust the volumn to a certain level and maintain the volumn all the way and not increase and descrease the volumn as it like..

He sent me a link and there is a user have such problem but his problem appear when he is at 50 feet away from the transmitter..
I can understand that at this distance signal would be loss..But i have this problem in the same room..even in 0.5 m distance from the transmitter..
QUOTE(accs_centre post 29)
Yup..i understand that sennheiser named it as 'feature'.. But i strongly believe 10 out of 10 ppl wont treat it as a feature but weekneses..
This apply on u (infinity) as well as u did mentioned such feature as 'irritating'...
Other than the "feature" problem.. i also face "only left treble and no bass" problem..
Since it is Sennheiser product design issue and u didnt inform me on the irritating 'feature', that's why i request for 90% refund..
QUOTE(accs_centre post33)
He never tell me on that "feature" until i complain..
He only mention the headphone give crystal clear sound in a thread..Nothing on the feature problem
QUOTE(accs_centre post45)
It is really product "feature" for the fade-in and fade-out sound..But it is also the product design problem where it is annoying to have such design..
It is everyone annoying feature..Infinity also think so.. Thus, i complain that he didnt tell me b4 about this everyone dislike feature..

Besides the "feature"problem, i also did complain to him the distorted sound with no bass at all.. He just told me it is due to weak battery and ask me to fully charge..
But problem still there after full charge..
From what I highlighted, it seems very obviously that you are not satisfied with the fade in fade out features after you using it.
And from what I seen here, you did not do your homework with this fade in fade out features. If you do your
homework, I don't think this problem will arise at all.
And you did mentioned you understand that it was a features, don't you?
Don't tell me, if you wants to buy anything, you did not compare or do your research

QUOTE(accs_centre post57)
I did do some google.. but only one or not site mostly is profesional reviewer's work..
I admit that i didnt do a day and night job..Should we as consumer must do a complete google before going for a product?
Finally, I have to ask this.. Anyone here will just accept such a headphone silently with RM400 paid?
You admit you didn't do night and day job. Should we do do our homework before buying?It is absolutely yes, unless you have abundant of money to spent whistling.gif
And don't tell me you buy stock market like you throw a dart, don't you? It is the same here. You could do more intense exercise about the stuff you are going to buy,
but you not. And now you not satisfied with it, you complain.Whose fault is this? You ask yourself.

QUOTE(accs_centre post65)
Mr. Infinity, Please make your promise here to refund me RM320 not later than wednesday..
(u will sure get the item on monday)
QUOTE(Infinity post66)
i'm sorry, this is not the case now... u r being wicked... if u agreed to the 80% return deal, u should stop doing this to jeopardise me...
or further push for a 90% return... now u broke the deal first and has push things too far,
i reserved my right to not refund you.
And i'm still angry at those who accused me and forcing me to refund without even easily do a google search on this feature.
QUOTE(accs_centre post=67)
Okie..fine.. pls post back the headphone to me then..
DONT eat my headphone! I have courier the headphone to u..

guy..see now..now he dont even want to refund 80% altot i have made my move.. ppl opened a thread and asking for justice and now he get angry with this so dunwan even refund 80%???

U r the KING...Do watever u want ya
accs_centre, I think you owed Infinity an apology, don't you?
From your post66 and 67, after ruining his reputation and being flamed for nothing.
If you were him, you would do the same thing wouldn't you? rolleyes.gif
And even if I was him, I won't refund you by this type of manners. Business is about communication and
responding to each of the party involved. If you did apologize earlier, I don't think this refund thing would face a problem.

This post has been edited by stevanistelrooy: Apr 11 2006, 03:48 AM
stevanistelrooy
post Apr 11 2006, 03:53 AM

Ten seconds you won't believe what's gonna happen.
Group Icon
VIP
2,450 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(accs_centre post87)
okie.. kedekut punya orang..
i pay u RM15 for poslaju.. more than enough..

No more words from u..ok?
and now you calling he kedekut while he is trying to get the answer from mediaplex?

I do agree with Infinity that wait for the Mediaplex result.
If the result falls on your hand, then Infinity should do what he suppose to do.

I'm not siding anyone, but accs_centre, aren't you a little strong headed? From all your post, it seems that you want him to refunds. The things is now at mediaplex, and you should wait as he is trying to prove that the headset is not defective as you claim it was.
If wverything is done accordingly, the answer will be obvious sided to anyone of you.

If you can't even wait, I really speechless. And don't tell me you drive a new bought car, suspected faulty after test 1 time, and straight claim for refund? Ain't logic isn't it?

and the headset fault, we can't judge it. In ethics, we can't blame it for warranty purpose. Who shall take the responsibility for the warranty when the seller and company both holding it? It is questionable, and we can't have a clear answer on this thing. Both side can have their own reason. Seller said he bought from company. Company said they sold to seller, and this thing drags on and on and won't be solved. Best solution, wait for the result from mediaplex. icon_rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by stevanistelrooy: Apr 11 2006, 04:00 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0222sec    0.62    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 11:34 AM