QUOTE(s2peMocls @ Mar 24 2013, 11:21 PM)
1) You admitted that it is not normal behavior. Your method of addressing abnormality are based on pure conjectures which does not apply in many situations. Clearly it is bad conjecture, yet you choose to plow on despite being pointed out as such.
2) Using ordinary circumstances to explain abnormal behavior is just poor reasoning. On top of that, presuming reasons (i.e. creating excuses) that are inapplicable on so many levels is what lends to bad understanding into why a person acts out a certain way, and will lead NOWHERE near solving the problem.
Can you tell me where is the conjecture in my comment? Empathy is not necessary in this picture as the mother is not the one I am communicating directly with. You are WAAAYYYY off in your attempts to undermine my credibility.
1) Of course it is a conjecture. I proposed an idea that is unproven, simply because that was how the initial premise was portrayed by TS. In any case, a lack of personal activities/interests on the part of the parent has always been one of the reasons behind the
Empty Nest Syndrome. But to satisfy you, let's say that I (and a whole slew of psychology experts are) wrong, you are right; my comment a conjecture and yours a fact.
2) Yes and your insta-diagnosis of a abnormal mother with dependency personality, is nothing new, just move along, is a much better advice and definitely way more helpful for TS?
So it is a bad conjecture on my part that the mother has no friends/hobbies of her own to pass her time, but it is
not one on your part with your comment on:
QUOTE
"Heh, mother with dependency personality. Will often raise a child with codependency characteristics. Nothing new here. Move along."
Ok man, you win.