New huge churches are mostly Christian and don't follow those catholic architecture. Most churches register as a non profit organization and built on commercial land. There are 0 new license offered other than those existing during mahathir era . So most have to pay assessment at a commercial rate

Nice Tered.

*yawnnn* recruitment drive again? I wonder which 2" would sell their souls away based on a few pictah of architecture?

This post has been edited by planb2: Mar 2 2013, 01:33 PM

Haha here comes planb2 with his annoying quote, try to be smart but kolos big time.

I think you mean Protestant, Catholics are Christians too.

malaysia baptist theological seminary in Batu Fringgi.


This post has been edited by Weldon29: Mar 2 2013, 01:44 PM

Or non-denom.

The term Protestant is strictly those communions that broke off during the reformation. Despite that, it's better to use the self-prescribed appellation of those communities. Lutherans, Baptist, Methodists etc

This post has been edited by feynman: Mar 2 2013, 01:48 PM

Protestants are Christians .... U must have learned from our sejarah text book which is wrong

waitt ill u see churches/chapels here in sabah/swk.

ull shit brick for sure, sometime it makes me wonder where were all those donation money went to

what? Protestants and Catholics both fall under the umbrella of Christianity

ya that would be more accurate

Protestants are Christians. You don't think so?

There are some churches that are not considered Christian by mainstream Christianity despite what they might claim to be. The LDS church and the JW's are some of the examples. I.e. the baptism carried out in these communities are not valid. That is to say if you were a mormon and then you became an anglican, you will need to be baptised. However, if you were a Baptist and you became a catholic later on, your baptism is valid.

Having Jesus Christ featured prominently in one's church doesn't mean it is Christian. The LDS view of Jesus is completely different from the 'mainstream' Christian view.

This post has been edited by feynman: Mar 2 2013, 02:05 PM

Protestant movement started by Martin Luther I believe, King Henry was only responsible for the Anglican Church, which is almost identical to the Roman Catholic church.

tat is a convention senter... associated wth a lot of internal scandal whilst it was building..

Banyaknya theologian kat sini.

We haven't discussed any theological issues, only historic

Discuss la, nothing wrong to me, I also want to learn wat.

LOL

in the end they are still considered as Christians. just becoz 1 mazhab has too many differences in comparison with another mazhab doesnt mean that said mazhab is not part of christianity.

just like how orthodox christian is still considered as christian.

Salah on multiple fronts. henry merajuk sebab tak boleh cerai. Dia mau cerai Catherine of Spain to marry Anne Boleyn whom he had her executed later because (whatever version of history that you like) he fell in love with Jane Seymour. Basically Henry was a horny old geezer.

"Protestant' is the term which was probably given by the Catholic church to those who were protesting against catholic teachings. The protesters probably viewed themselves as reformers.

It's the Swiss Reformed Church, not the Swiss Protestant Church. You get it?

There is really only one version of that religion. Just many interpretations.


Deswai Anglicans are known as Catholic Lite. The only thing that changed then was that the 'final authority' was not in Rome but in London. The beliefs were all the same. Now of course things have changed a lot.

although i am not christian but i went there before~