QUOTE(ghoss @ Feb 22 2013, 12:31 PM)
Sauce Probability
Banker wins 0.458597
Player wins 0.446247
Tie 0.095156
Ignoring tie in baccarat . Spliting the odds for tie to both Banker + Player, 0.095156/2 = 0.047578
Banker wins = 0.458597 + 0.047578 = 0.506175
Player wins = 0.493825
With this I can say it's close to 50%-50% after reducing the 5% commision on banker wins.
Regarding the streaks in baccarat --->
Wizard of Odds Seems like my calculation earlier is correct
NoteI don't play the wheel only bangala ~
Adding the Tie probabilities to banker and player seems wrong because you don't win money of it. Mathematically incorrect la bro
Please double check this:
1.WWW = +3 (1+1+1)
2.WWL =+1 (1+1-1)
3.WLW =+3 (1-1+3)
4.WLL =-3 (1-1-3)
5.LWW =+3 (-1+3+1)
6.LLW =+3 (-1-3+7)
7.LWL =+1 (-1+3-1)
8.LLL =-11 (-1-3-7)
Also if you are going to bet on so called 50/50 bets then single zero wheel black/red yields a higher winning percentage (which is 48.65 as opposed to banker 45.85. Both also NOT 50-50).
If you read careful in wizardofodds:
I get asked a lot about the probability of getting x bets in a row correct in baccarat.
Not that the answer is of any value, but to end the questions, I submit the following table
If you have been reading wizardofodds then you will know that he is super anti martingale or system of any form. I will say that NO system has been proven to win 100% in long games. Casino wins in long run.
The reason I'm giving these points is because I don't want fellow GGC members to feel that this system is sure fire to work. TREAD WITH CARE
This post has been edited by whyseej00: Feb 22 2013, 12:51 PM