QUOTE(andrekua2 @ Feb 20 2013, 12:26 PM)
The score was okay but it was impressive how much faster it finished those integer test and was already at graphic test.
coz the new snapdragon 600 is 30% faster than the snapdragon s4 pro on the nexus.HTC One Official Thread / M7, 4.7" 1080p - Snapdragon S600 1.7ghz
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 01:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Feb 22 2013, 05:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
At least HTC doesnt spam flagship model like Sony.
S,SL,T,TX,V,Z,ZL |
|
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(Benny-T @ Feb 28 2013, 12:46 PM) hi guys,wanted to ask anywhere i can send my htc for services? SIS or BRIGHTSTAR warranty?totally blank out and got some yellow tint on my phone sent to their respective SC. http://www.brightstarcorp.com.my/brightsta...ervice-centres/ http://www.sis.com.my/cms_contactus.aspx?mod=7 |
|
|
Feb 28 2013, 12:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 06:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(hengmy @ Mar 4 2013, 05:58 PM) actual usage only uses 4 cores, it wont use 8 cores together. i wouldn't say this is a marketing gimmick. the slower core will help to improve battery life. it actually more than marketing gimmick to advertise 8 cores to normal consumer, in fact they just have a poor power efficiency high speed quad core, so that slap in old tech quad core for battery saver. Coz in the end of the day, user will only utilize the A7(slower) quad core. because no apps will require the power of the A15 core. |
|
|
Mar 4 2013, 08:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(waveweaver @ Mar 4 2013, 07:34 PM) thanks for explaining BTW there are very few apps that will take advantage of the processing power of the A15 core. with Exynos Octa( ARM big.LITTLE ) we can have best of both world. performance and battery life. This post has been edited by soulseeker6187: Mar 4 2013, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Mar 14 2013, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(Nephrite @ Mar 15 2013, 04:50 PM) No you were wrong. More cores dosent means it is better. See how the architecture who create and utilize it. we have just to wait and see the real world usage of the exynos octa-core then only can judge whether its truely battery saving or just a marketing gimmick |
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(benny888 @ Mar 15 2013, 05:08 PM) It is custom rom based on HTC One - is a full HTC Sense 5 rom with all Sense 5 features . I have check it against all the reviews done on HTC sense 5 and nothing seems to be missing and even the screenshots/fonts are exactly same as that in HTC One. is it really a 100% reproduction - I have no idea ! good to hear that HTC has vastly improving sense.Phone even boot up as HTC One !!! last time sense was so bloated an very slow. |
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(Andrewtst @ Mar 15 2013, 05:18 PM) If S4 big fail in sales, probably Samsung will look more on design and material in next flagship phone. S4 will be a huge success. with all the marketing budget. sure many people will buy.If S4 still selling as success as S III, Samsung forever give you plastic and similar design. i have no problem with plastic phone, but hope their design the phone better in the future. Even the " UNDESTRUCTABLE NOKIA 3310" also plastic |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(MsiaqweR @ Mar 15 2013, 05:29 PM) Dont compare Nokia 3310. plastic have been proven to be strong and cheap to produce.Nokia 3310 is in year 1995. In year 1995, ppl will not complain if phones are made of plastics due to technology constraints as during that time, technology can't produce zero-gap aluminium and weigh just 143g We are now in 2013, if phones are still in plastics, ppl will complain as ppl expects more quality build phones. Having experience of using a HTC desire S which is made from aluminium, trust me the aluminium body is not durable at all. prone to dent and scratches if its dropped. Aluminium is gorgeous to see, but need to care properly. |
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 05:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(redlyfs @ Mar 15 2013, 05:46 PM) Dude that phone was built over 2 decades ago. And technically your logic is flawed. What you're saying now is : its not like that.Samsung S4 = plastic <=> Nokia 3310 = plastic Nokia = indestructible -> Samsung Indestructible I like to to see it take the punishment of a Nokia 3310 and live. what I want to say is plastic is durable. I feel u guys, paying so much money for a phone and want something premium and pleasing to look at. But having own an aluminium phone before, what i can say aluminium need a very good care to prevent from dent and scratches. thats why i dont mind plastic phone. Just my 2 cents. |
|
|
Mar 15 2013, 06:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(redlyfs @ Mar 15 2013, 06:18 PM) +1. I agree with U that samsung plastic quality is not that good. this is an area they should improve on.I myself owned a HTC Sensation. It's a damn solid phone. Throughout its 1.5year lifespan with me, its been sat on, drop on road/ concrete and once rolled over by a car on grass. The back cover is obviously scratched but no dents or deep disfigurements. My screen have no SP, and only got 2 tiny 1mm scratch marks on it. Recently I bought sandpaper bit and sandpapered the whole cover, then polish it. No dents, no bends, no deep scratches. Looks spanking new. True, you need to take care. This normally applies for all devices. However, each man to his taste. There's merits and demerits. Even if Samsung decides to stick with plastic, at least upgrade to a different material. My gf's sister's G S3's cover snapped, then screen cracked from a short drop. My colleague's G S+'s side plastic chipped away, now the whole faceplate looks totally disfigured, half black, half white. And because its the faceplate she can't just easy get a replacement. Personally I've seen a lot of Samsung products around me, and most of them is made of the same plastic. If u see Nokia phone all plastic but their quality is good. too bad they are running windows phone. |
|
|
Mar 17 2013, 04:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(deepan84 @ Mar 17 2013, 04:34 PM) AFAIK HTC malaysia (SIS distribution) doesnt do 1 to 1 exchange.last time my friend One X got speaker issue but no 1 to 1 exchange. settle service in 3 days. This post has been edited by soulseeker6187: Mar 17 2013, 04:43 PM |
|
|
Mar 18 2013, 01:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(giovanni @ Mar 18 2013, 01:06 PM) So this review said that HTC One's camera captures less detail compared to iPhone 5's. To be honest, iPhone 5's does seem to be sharper. It supposed to coz of the lesser MP count.http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/mobile-phones/ht...eview-50010439/ more pixel count more detail capture. but the ultra pixel have larger pixel size than conventional and it claim to produce clearer image. |
|
|
Mar 18 2013, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,774 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
QUOTE(giovanni @ Mar 18 2013, 01:15 PM) But many said that more mp doesn't mean sharper image. But it is clearly showing n this pic. HTC One is acceptable but you can tell that iPhone 5 has far superior quality pic. I have iPhone 5 so i dont want to feel like it's a downgrade. i dont know much about camera. that what people claim it is.didnt realy bother about phone camera as long it produce acceptable picture is enough. phone camera usually for FB, instagram. so i dont bother much as long as its ok. I actually agree that 5 MP its enough for a phone cam. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0457sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 02:03 AM |