And nobody talks abt battery. 2300mAh? Mehh
HTC One Official Thread / M7, 4.7" 1080p - Snapdragon S600 1.7ghz
HTC One Official Thread / M7, 4.7" 1080p - Snapdragon S600 1.7ghz
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
And nobody talks abt battery. 2300mAh? Mehh
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE(WyjSwmW @ Feb 20 2013, 12:41 AM) Come on, 2300mAH is pretty impressive Lolololol. Compare with Note II, again. Even Razr Maxx and Maxx HD are filled in with 3300mAh; with smaller screen, and without sacrificing the thinness. Idk what Motorola will be putting in the next flagship of Google/Motorola X Phone. 3500mAh? I laughed at people who always charge their battery up every single day or bring Powerbank just in case their phone dies; while my phone can last more than a day just like that1) S600 is 40% more battery effiecient than S4 Pro 2) This phone only 4.7" vs Note 2 of 5.5".... smaller screen comsume lesser power 3) Why Note 2 can have 3100mAH? Bcos it is a big size phone, so Samseng can slot it a bigger flatter battery into the phone without scarifying its thinness. If Note 2 is only 4.7" and can put in 3100mAH without reaching a thickness of 15mm, I tiok. Understand? Anyway, let's just see how it fares. Might perhaps it'll succumb to everyone's needs |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 12:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
QUOTE What is an UltraPixel? A stupid trademarked buzzword for one particular manufacturer's CMOS photo receptors that are slightly larger than the other CMOS photo receptors by the same manufacturer, because calling them "lower resolution" is still apparently un-cool, and it's better to just not challenge the mold that more megapixels=better unless we can come up with stupid buzzwords for "better pixels" to explain it away. Larger sensors have been around forever, and are ALWAYS better. Cramming more photo receptors onto smaller dies has ALWAYS degraded pixel quality. This is nothing new. This has been the case for as long as digital photography has existed, and any photographer already knows this, and compares sensors accordingly. This is just a way to market fewer pixels to the uneducated best-buy-shopping masses, and is just as meaningless as the "megapixels" metric the blue shirts are pushing. This post has been edited by SyathibiyMegat: Feb 20 2013, 12:44 PM |
|
|
Feb 20 2013, 04:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,634 posts Joined: Dec 2011 |
Dafuq with the benchmarks; crazy liao. At the moment, only Optimus G Pro is its contender
This post has been edited by SyathibiyMegat: Feb 20 2013, 10:51 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0935sec
0.35
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 10:04 AM |