Photography Pentax User Group V4, LYN Pentax Users
Photography Pentax User Group V4, LYN Pentax Users
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 10:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
woah that is very low
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2013, 10:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2013, 01:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
I bet the old lenses price will be higher later
|
|
|
Feb 24 2013, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
I don't think so. It use newer sensor so it should be ahead of the K5-IIs.
|
|
|
Mar 16 2013, 10:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Is the TTL system very important in flash?
How hard is it in handling manual flash? |
|
|
Apr 4 2013, 07:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2013, 11:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
It should work fine. I got one when I bought my Pentax K-r.
|
|
|
Apr 22 2013, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Which one is better as kit lens replacement?
Tamrom 17-50 2.8 Sigma 17-70 2.8-4 |
|
|
Apr 24 2013, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(Icehart @ Apr 22 2013, 08:45 PM) Depends on your shooting preference. Do you shoot in low light often? What is your most used focal length? IMO, one stop difference in the aperture doesn't really matter. By the way, maybe you want to have a look at Sigma's 17-50. I find Tamron's build quality poor. Used for 2-3 years and the rubber for the zoom mechanism came off. Sigma has longer reach but the Tamron has better image quality I think. I'm also considering Pentax 16-45 F4 but dunno where to find.. |
|
|
May 21 2013, 08:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Anyone checked flickr new layout?
It's quite good and now there's also 1 TB storage. This post has been edited by Patent: May 21 2013, 08:56 PM |
|
|
May 22 2013, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2013, 02:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Pentax K-50 is coming?
Replacement for K-30 I guess ![]() http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k-...-dslr.html#more |
|
|
Jun 6 2013, 03:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
I don't see the point of releasing it though. Just like a rebranded K-30 with minor improvement. Maybe it's supposed to be K-30ii?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2013, 05:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
The K-50 isn't really smaller than K-30. The size is about the same.
K-30: 130 x 97 x 71 mm K-50: 129 × 96.5 × 70 mm The only new thing here is probably the DA L kit lens with weather sealing. |
|
|
Jun 7 2013, 07:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Probably because its not a common focal length for APS-C camera.
|
|
|
Jun 13 2013, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
I guess its time to replace my K-r with K-500 then.
Or maybe just buy the K-30. Pretty sure the price will go down now. This post has been edited by Patent: Jun 13 2013, 03:04 PM |
|
|
Aug 5 2013, 02:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(navilink @ Aug 5 2013, 09:27 AM) Where to get that head costume? |
|
|
Aug 28 2013, 03:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
QUOTE(azerak @ Aug 27 2013, 11:41 PM) I dont think we only need expensive lenses for use with our dslr. as we can see from the list, the most worthy lenses are those like 16-45 and the 50 1.8. i have tested 50 1.8 before and im definitely impressed.if it is priced more or less like canikon, im definitely getting it. I personally like the green ring more btw, some news about pentax lenses http://photorumors.com/2013/08/27/pentax-t...ular-apertures/ instead of coming up with new lenses, they come up with new coatings. but theres still hope for new lenses though. Red ring look canon-ish. Still good to see they are upgrading the current lenses. ![]() |
|
|
Aug 28 2013, 10:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
Also lets not forget the new flashes that are weather sealed.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/new-weath...-by-pentax.html |
|
|
Aug 29 2013, 04:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,003 posts Joined: Mar 2009 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0248sec
0.73
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 08:13 AM |