bisi tuak ditu

Archaeological evidence demonstrates a technological connection between the farming cultures of the south (Southeast Asia and Melanesia) and sites that are first known from mainland China, whereas a combination of archaeological and linguistic evidence has been interpreted as supporting a northern (southern China and Taiwan) origin for the Austronesian language family. In a recent treatment, all Austronesian languages were classified into 10 subfamilies, with all the extra-Formosan languages grouped in one subfamily and with representatives of the remaining 9 known only in Taiwan.[5] It has been argued that these patterns are best explained by dispersal of an agricultural people from Taiwan into insular Southeast Asia, Melanesia, and, ultimately, the remote Pacific. Although this model—termed the “express train to Polynesia”[6][7] – is broadly consistent with available data, concerns have been raised.[8] Alternatives to this model posit an indigenous origin for the Austronesian languages in Melanesia or Southeast Asia

tldr: Migration and dispersion from China/Taiwan. (regarded as one of the theories)

well, i copy pasta from ur link. so, thanks for agreeing with me.

nama utai insap nuan dlm gambar nuan nyak, dom?

mabuk langkau alu ngambi gambar

Got any sisters

read carefully lah



and china chinese is not even our ancestor by default

but the FACT i acknoledge that chinese has been present in Sabah and Sarawak and probably assimilate or integrate to either kadazan dusun, iban, murut, bidayuh, melanau, dayak etc during the middle ages toward the industrial revolution ages, in which we can still see today.

this

now i want my 5% discount in buying house

This post has been edited by kumanosuke: Oct 22 2013, 08:30 PM

the study only refute the claim of mass population replacement to replace the PREEXISTING HUNTING AND GATHERING POPULATIONS BY FARMER VOYAGING IMMIGRANTS FROM TAIWAN.

Not to mention, i copy pasta my original content from wiki itself:
Iban People



Anyway, my real intention of creating this thread in the first place is to question the legitimacy of bumiputra status. Who are we to decide who owned this piece of land? People keep on barking "hey my ancestors lived here first, so i should have special privilege bla bla bla' when the fact that their original ancestors are from Africa. (or if u are practicing abrahimic religions, Adam and Eve)

got..eldest...

pic

Im iban thai chinese, how

damn laju betul post, aku tengah makan pula

again baca betul-betul



OK i make myself clear here

i don't give shit to NEP, Ketuanan Melayu or whatsoever (i still believe however that Malays (combine people of java, bugis, sumatera, minangkabau jambi, acheh, and aborigines deep in the jungle into one race) are native of the Peninsular, and Those Native kadazan bidayuh melanau dayak etc are natives of Borneo)

what i stress here is that we are NOT descendant of china chinese, we are not even near to it. Even more the native Taiwan are real deal, not even close, similar or related in term of DNA, culture and language to mainland china whatsoever. If you accepting it then you accepting the PRC Propaganda

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OK i answer your question to legitimacy of bumiputra status.

waaaaaaaaaaay back after WW2, the british still keen on hoarding the peninsular and singapore as colonial treasure chest. and there was a new threat, mainly the communism from USSR now spreading eastward hard into china and it's territory.

the british, in order to sustain their new colonial ruling, establish the malayan union in hope that all the peon that alive from the bloody war could be control en mass. but it was a setback, cause the majority of Malays, who are small percent of them are english educated (nobles people) decide to rebel and ditch the malayan union. by then UMNO was established and Malayan Union after enough pressure disband in favour of more UMNO oriented government call Persekutuan Tanah Melayu.



the original purpose was never to included sabah and sarawak in the first place. it was British who brought the idea when communism was at it peak. Bumiputra status was MEANT only to alleviate the social economy inbalance between the already rich chinese and indian community and the poor malay. Bumiputra status was never enforce until the day when Founder of UMNO, Jaafar Onn realize it's original idea was futile decide to open UMNO membership to all race.

what did he get? kena kick out and branded as traitor to malay race.

so now we know UMNO are the one who start this "bumiputra status" and start the racial tension.

then came along LKY. his idea is great but was to extremist according to some, Tunku was skeptical for he believe it might bring good for unionship of both Federated Malay State and singapore, but bring disposition to racial imbalance.

then came sabah problem with Sulu, and Sarawak with Raja Putih bailing out his people.

from that they join us on 63 and singapore kena kick in 65, and forward the infamous 13 may 69 incident.

again UMNO never enforce bumiputra right accordingly until that incident in 69, UMNO kena b& and few years later a new UMNO was born and was head by our gracious mamakthir and the rest faham fahamlah sendiri.

so there is, bumiputra status is there, but never enforce and never regulated. in fact our constitution change mostly after 69 incident which is the work of the new UMNO headed by mamakthir.



again like singapore, they accept and agree, but do they enforce? no cause it's stupid and will create racial disharmony.

that's why i hate tongkat, it useless, orang melayu atau asli susah dapat MARA? kalau crony bolehlah, orang melayu atau asli yang lain tiada cable? boleh pergi mampus



bumiputra in a sense, was just a title.

but kena abused by UMNO/BN and crony till now.

sebab tu aku mahu mansuh NEP, kasi semua sama rata.

BN know this and they afraid, cause one day when we united they knew they will be in deep shit even the shit they get into cannot be recognize by any scientific reason.

i rant this long to make it clear

i didn't came to /K/ to make enemy of other race, i want to be friends

if chinese ada soalan about malay right or islam i gladly jawab, as long you don't troll for obvious reason

also i came here to correct certain historical fact

banyak pakai wiki actually really bad

actually aku x pun 100% disagree with your point or 100% agree with my own point, im just stating that the one im pointing out is one out of thousands of theories regarding the true origin of Iban people.

dan aku pun tahu, benda2 saintifik mcm ni susah nak pinpoint which theories are facts and which theories are farce sbb kita x ada time travel machine utk verify betui2 these origins stories. That's why there's a saying 'science is still in its early stage' and thats why buku2 reference sains perlu kena updated almost annually.

yes, i agree with you that cronies are the ones who benefit more from this so-called 'special privileges' schemes.

do note that this thread was created almost a year ago, and if my memory serves me well, i created this thread as a retort to many of racist /k-tards who are championing bumiputra privileges for reasons so absurd. i myself am a bumi i dont favor this practice of favoritism.

DAFUQ THEN I WAS REPLYING TO NECRO THREAD

yeap, january 2013.

awwwwwwwww sheeeeeeettt manggggggg

damn bloody thread necromancer

Dari dulu ibans dah x bersatu, macam mana nak control moden sarawak?

Chinese in swak called dayaks lakia which is similar to suarez calling ezra negro

ts. u dah ready ke pakai camni? nanti bila taib halau masuk hutan sudah prepare. masa tu jgn pulak cakap iban bukan asal china.

apa lagi orang iban mau ?