To add on, i received an epic reply from the condo's Property Manager. After sending emails to them for three (3) months saying that all complaints to be submitted via the management office.

The way they handle is driving me crazy!

Ask them to give u real timber flooring + marble. Hahaha

New discovery on the non-sensitive main gate access,
- Problem arise after VP, in March 2016, and for the past 3-4 months we are suffering with the non-sensitive main gate access, which most of the time i have to wind down my passenger window to get it works.
- Had meeting with develop on April which they promised to conduct a survey to validate how many owners facing the problems and the symptoms, have not seen any of those being conducted.
- Sent numerous complaint emails over the past 3 months to the developer non were responded.
- Finally, a response from the developer on mid July 2016, the summary of the statement is,



- Question, how do we derive the conclusion on heavily tinted car affecting the sensitivity, is there a proof? Any supporting facts on this justification?
- Finally, i had a chat with the contractor servicing at the condo and he taught me the proper way of holding the access card, and voola, i have no problem scanning the card in / out.
- Question, who should be first conducting all these diagnostic and solutions, and who should be communicating this alternative to the owners?

Lift car card reader
- Problem arise after the card reader were placed within the lift panel.
- Any scanning of the card takes 3 to 10 seconds and very the reading sensitivity is inconsistent.
- Sent numerous complaint emails over the past 3 months to the developer non were responded.
- Finally, a response from the developer on mid July 2016, the summary of the statement is,



- On the same chat with the contractor servicing the condo, I was told that our access card has two (2) parts, the long range chip and proximity chips. If we were to scan it on where the proximity chip located, the scanning should be more sensitive, and I have personally tested it, on certain part / position, the scanning is more sensitive, all we need now is to know exactly where the proximity chip located.
- Question puzzling me, who should be first conducting all these diagnostic and solutions, and who should be communicating this alternative to the owners? Why are we moving backward?

a smart developer would have instructed each and every service provider to provide training/manuals for their product and in return combined it into their house rule book.
then it's covered. voila!

Hi kiathau, we have viewed few units at KM1 East, apart from your list mentioned above, not sure if you too feel that the design of the rilling at the balcony is kind of too wide apart, we actually asked officer at the MO if they (or owner) can do something about it, answer given was NO. Kinda worry if something might have fallen while walking under the balcony.

The sales brochure shown balcony sealed with glass!

wah! this developer gives so many problems to the home owners!

Yes, we have the same concern of the choice of material, the balcony railing is made of wood, which cracked almost every few months

Same answer, nothing can be done.

I felt a bit helpless at this stage.

This sounds horrible and totally unacceptable! Have you tried gather more owners' concerns just to protect the interest of the owners and bring the issues to the table and call for a formal discussion with developer? If they still tidak apa attitude, get media to involve too?

Hi Akita, tried gathering the owners but does not yield any favorable results. State of refusal now. Media is the last choice and may not be supported by everyone

didn't know this development was this bad