Here is the video of Puchong Hartamas Guardhouse that was demolished by MPSJ. WTF. Please dont tell me developer cuci tangan? Haiya
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V10FsfFEFZ0
Puchong Hartamas Guardhouse Demolished
|
|
 Dec 27 2012, 10:27 AM, updated 13y ago
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008 
|
Dear All,
Here is the video of Puchong Hartamas Guardhouse that was demolished by MPSJ. WTF. Please dont tell me developer cuci tangan? Haiya http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V10FsfFEFZ0 |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Dec 27 2012, 10:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(puchongite @ Dec 27 2012, 10:39 AM) Meaning the G&G thingie for Puchong Hartamas was never approved by MPSJ or it's the the guard house not approved ? I am not so sure myself. but mpsj came, demolished without prior notice. The RA president got upset and called mpsj, teresa kok and kim crest (developer) to explain. after 4 years only mpsj wanna roboh. really wtf. what is the current situation eh? anybody from puchong hartamas? |
|
|
Dec 27 2012, 10:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Dec 27 2012, 10:48 AM) Wahh. Why MPSJ so free to go to demolish this kind of tolerate thingy? If no approval then settle by money ma, MPSJ, famous for it what. Ya lor. I am not staying in Puchong Hartamas but I am quite upset too to know this because WTF is the government, police and mpsj doing about safety? mpsj said the guardhouse is too dangerous to be built there because of the sharp turning to guardhouse. yes, it can be dangerous but i sometimes use that road too. it is not that dangerous. come on. now without guardhouse, it will be more dangerous to the residents there.If Puchong Hartamas now is guardless, then habis lah security. Property price also would not increase much dy. |
|
|
Dec 27 2012, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(Chris Chew @ Dec 27 2012, 11:02 AM) I was upset too. But to say the turning to the guardhouse is too dangerous was just a stupid reason to their act. Yeah, there are bumps there too. Not that dangerous. Nonsense la MPSJ. Bandar Puteri landslide who want to solve? Then suddenly this happens. BS!It was the road issue and if really turning to guardhouse is dangerous, then should allocate one or two bumps to ease the cars speed. Now, the residents are living more dangerous without guardhouse. Nonsense MPSJ act. They dont see what is a purpose of a guardhouse and simply demolish it. |
|
|
Dec 27 2012, 11:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
QUOTE(puchongite @ Dec 27 2012, 11:32 AM) And with inflation the G&G are ever wanting to increase the subscriptions. My place the RA is asking the members to pay more. And I see a whole bunch of guards ( maybe got 10 people ) hired. Ghee .....when security is bad, people want to have their own guards, but won't that will make the police more slack ? By having more guards, increasing subscriptions, is it improving security or making thing worse ? Security has improved. Definitely. However, it is not due to our police force. So IGP said crime rate reduced = yes. But not thanks to you, IGP Bloody fool. It is the citizens who are taking own initiatives.This post has been edited by AMINT: Dec 27 2012, 11:41 AM |
|
|
Dec 28 2012, 10:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
7,446 posts Joined: Sep 2008
|
i just came back from puchong hartamas. the new guardhouse is made from plywood. haiyo. correct me if i am wrong but there is no difference in terms of location. i really dont understand mpsj and kim crest
|
| Change to: |  0.0150sec
 0.56
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 11:24 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.