no luck so far. played quite well.
Chelsea FC V19, EL - Chelsea 3 - 1 S Bucuresti Agg 3 - 2
Chelsea FC V19, EL - Chelsea 3 - 1 S Bucuresti Agg 3 - 2
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 04:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
no luck so far. played quite well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 05:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
nice 2 assist by Iva
10 mins Ba is more threatening than 80 mins torres |
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 10:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(Zeuss1220 @ Jan 10 2013, 08:55 AM) the 2nd goal was the killer, if going 1-0 down at home wasn't enough. I'm with you on this. But ESPN said he's commanding the midfield during the game, quite agree also, just his shooting and FK need to be improve. When is the 2nd leg? And anyone else doesn't want to see Luiz in midfield anymore, i think its time for someone else to take the pivot spots. But only options we have now are Lampard and Rami. Actually Oscar can drop deep also, so can put Marin on attacking side. |
|
|
Jan 10 2013, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
Yes, oscar look weird on right side. His cross also not much threaten. Right side should belong to Moses & Marin.
|
|
|
Jan 17 2013, 12:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 21 2013, 12:55 AM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
another tales of 2 strikers eh?
Ba with 10 mins managed to get 1 shot on target compared with Torres with zero shot on target. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 21 2013, 01:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 04:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
|
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 04:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
still slow in attacking.
|
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
something wrong with the ref. too lenient.
and treatment at the middle of the field? |
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
sub in CB ?? what the heck rafa!
iva injured? This post has been edited by eeki: Jan 24 2013, 05:14 AM |
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
milo boy conspiracy. LOL
|
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
MOTM is the referee. player kena foul no card. ramires did harsh tackle no card. ba claim penalty but no penalty.
ball boy kena kick. red card. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
The young ballboy was in tears after that Hazard kick. He was wrong to smoother the ball, but Hazard's actions were just unbelievable. - ESPN
This post has been edited by eeki: Jan 24 2013, 05:43 AM |
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
ok. rafa is definitely insane.
sub out Iva with Luiz when chelsea is LOSING with 2 goals. sub out Cole with Bertrand when chelsea with 10 ppl and CHASING. substitute defender with defender. in rafa we frust. |
|
|
Jan 24 2013, 05:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
QUOTE(RyanHo @ Jan 24 2013, 05:34 AM) R u serious? Kick ball boy worse than everything u mentioned. If he wasn't red carded, he will receive bans post match for sure. what i meant is the decision with the card through out the game. hazard fault is really red card. no argument. but many harsh decision that he overlook. |
|
|
Jan 25 2013, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
![]() ![]() just for the LOL |
|
|
Jan 29 2013, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
em, question. How come player like Kakuta & Van Aanholt consider as academy player? We bought them also right.
Is it because of home grown rule? Or buy at young age and they "graduate" from academy to become first team materials? |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 10:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
got live telecast tonight?
from astro website, seems like a delay telecast. This post has been edited by eeki: Jan 30 2013, 10:45 AM |
|
|
Jan 30 2013, 11:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
299 posts Joined: May 2007 |
if Jack Butland buying is true, it just another Chelsea business model. Buy cheap at young age and may sell or keep it later depend on development progress.
Hilario contract end this season, his definitely leaving Chelsea. And Turnbull with no progress. some youngster backup keeper will be promoted next season, either Blackman or X player. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0225sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 02:47 PM |