what modem u use with that apn??

---

Added on January 2, 2013, 7:59 pm

celcom LTE waiting for green light actually...check the video below and see the speed....wewww 

CELCOM LTE VIDEO

anyone tested max4g on mf680? is it possible that it renders pages faster?

My zte mf680 seems to be faster with direct usb compare with tplink mr3420...

if what celcom claimed is true.. then its a really great news not only to us the consumers, but also to malaysia. currently there are very few countries in the world having nationwide lte coverage

and maxis will have to change their marketing line "fastest and widest data network"

perhaps i should use stock values too

If Celcom do actually follow this schedule, then I do agree they are rolling it at a very very very fast pace.

Kudos to those Engineers if they can plan their base station so fast.

http://www.celcom.com.my/corporate/news/im...ncement-13.html

Erm, it don't works for me actually

Since at my congested location, I need bigger packet to be transferred at once not more packet which make it more congested.

I try to get the largest value possible as long as it is not fragmented

It may be different for others

holy smokes, stock value goes extra mile~

the broadband voodoo doctor, does magics

openwrt + stock value on modem TX

so i guess using the openwrt package for mf680 is better on the v1 openwrt

---

Added on January 2, 2013, 8:32 pm
you are really testing my eagerness

my mf680 has the purple on still try or not to try, any backup options for firmware?

do i need to upload bin file for e372 on openwrt fw?

I'm still original firmware and its purple light

MTU 101

Latency vs. packet size

If MTU = 1500, then: (1460+40) * 8 / 1,544,000 = 7.772 ms delay per hop
1 MByte / MSS = 1,048,576 bytes / 1460 = 718.2, or effectively 719 packets to transfer 1 MByte.
Then, to transfer 1Mbyte: 719 packets * 7.772 ms delay per hop = 5588.068 ms, or 5.588 seconds per hop.
If we are transferring our 1 MByte ovfile er 10 hops, it will ideally take us:
(1st packet * 10 hops * 7.772ms delay) + 718 * 7.772 = 5.658 seconds.

If MTU = 576, then: (536+40) * 8 / 1,544,000 = 2.924 ms delay per hop.
1 MByte / MSS = 1,048,576 bytes / 536 = 1956.3, or effectively 1957 packets to transfer 1 MByte.
Then, to transfer 1 MByte: 1957 packets * 2.924 ms delay per hop = 5722.268 ms, or 5.722 seconds per hop.
If we are transferring our 1 MByte file over the same 10 hops:
(1st packet *10 hops * 2.924ms delay) + 1956 * 2.924 = 5.748 sec.

It is obvious then that smaller packets will be transmitted faster

The difference comes from the fact that when using larger packets the overhead is smaller.

For a 10-hop transfer, the additional overhead accounts for just a fraction of a second, however it makes a difference if you consider large transfers over long periods of time.

This difference is a also higher in practice, considering TCP options and the fact that modern TCP/IP implementations tend to use larger headers (additional 12 bytes header space for Timestamps for example).

Also, the above example uses best case scenario, not considering higher latency and congestion.

One has to realize the fact that larger packets will still transit more useful data than smaller packets, and that there is no single "best" solution for all applications.

Therefore, try your own MTU, it may works for you, it may not

Reference

Technically, you notice ping is faster when MTU size is smaller

If you was a gamer TIPS : Use a small MTU

In real time condition, although a larger MTU transmit data at a shorter period but it depends, since Wireless can be affected by endless possibility

Use this to see it's difference

Use this command

The above one is an example for sure don't works

ping 8.8.8.8 -f -l 576
ping 8.8.8.8 -f -l 1420

WCDMA TX Power = 20

---

Added on January 2, 2013, 9:22 pmnow i wonder if i can use the max4g apn now on a 3g network

do heavy sites resolve faster?

same with me..speed more stable after change the mtu value

how to change mtu in windows? without router here...because my tower less congested as peak hour also same..only 1-2 mb reduce

for my place

using dashboard...the ping extremely low 3X-5X average 46
using 576..ping not good ...3X-120X average 8X
using 1492...ping very2 not good..8X-27X..average 17X