QUOTE(mingisms @ Oct 18 2013, 02:18 PM)
In Amoeba sp., substances such as oxygen and carbon dioxide can diffuse in and out of the cell due to its large total surface area to volume ratio. Humans have a smaller total surface area to volume ratio than Amoeba sp. Substances such as oxygen and carbon dioxide have to travel a longer distance throughout the body. Human skin is impermeable to oxygen and carbon dioxide. Hence, specialised cells are required to form specialised organs such as respiratory organs to aid in the transport of oxygen throughout the human body.
As you can see, it's all over the place and I employed the "write everything you know" method.
Here's the suggested answer for full [ 3 ] marks :
E1 : Multicellular organisms have many cells but unicellular organisms have one cell only
E2 : Multicellular organisms need specialised cells to perform different functions but unicellular organisms can perform different functions with its single cell
E3 : Cells of multicellular organisms are very far from environment and it's hard for diffusion but cells of unicellular organisms are near to environment to enable faster/easier diffusion
In a way , Terengganu's panel of question setters were quite stringent when they came out with the mark scheme . Normally , for Biology questions with the word 'explain' in it , there should be F , the main fact , and then E , explanations of the fact .
Back then , I used to write everything I knew ( in form four ) . After doing many trial papers , I have acquired the ability to structure my answers better ( still needs improvement ) according to sequence or facts . For example , if a question says ' Explain the effects of respiratory inhibitor like herbicide on Amoeba sp. ' , I sort my answers according to the sequence below :
1 . Respiratory inhibitor inhibits cellular respiration / Mitochondria cannot function
2 . Energy / ATP cannot be generated / produced
3 . Active transport cannot be carried out
4 . Contractile vacuole cannot contract to remove excess water
5 . Amoeba sp. dies / bursts / haemolyses
If the question awards 2 marks , any 2 would do . I would definitely write more than required for safety .
This comes from practice . I'd like to reiterate that I still need more practices as I've encountered many questions that tripped me off , for example , explain the process shown by Planarian sp. [ with a diagram of it dividing , 3 marks ] .
SPM Biology P2 is not a bed of roses . It requires high order thinking skills ( normally the last section of a question ) , where we need to apply what we've studied to come up with explanations . That's why I enjoy SPM Biology , it's not a swallow here puke there subject , it requires us to think . More examples of high order thinking skills questions :
Golgi apparatus is found abundantly in the cells of a root cap . Explain what happens to the root cap if Golgi apparatus fails to function . [2m] T'gannu 2012
Answer :
1 . Less slimy lubricant is produced
2 . Movement of root in between soil becomes more difficult
To highlight the plight I faced when answering this questions , here's my actual answer when I first encountered the question :
1 . Less mucus is produced because less extracellular enzyme is produced
2 . Root cannot penetrate deep into soil to absorb water
See ? I think everyone of us has difficulty coming up with perfect answers . If a student simply memorises the functions of organelles without knowing that mucus is an example of a protein , they wouldn't be able to answer this question . I'll try to highlight a few more , actual answers , and my answers :
If afferent neurone in spinal cord breaks down , what would happen ? [3 marks ] T'gannu 2012
Answer :
1 . Impulse cannot be transmitted from receptors to CNS / Brain and spinal cord
2 . Brain cannot detect / interpret / integrate the impulse / information
3 . Stimulus cannot be detected
My answer :
1 . Impulse cannot travel to the brain and spinal cord to be interpreted
2 . No impulse is sent to the effector
3 . No response is carried out
One example from SPM 2010 :
Silk is an example of protein . A silk garment crumples when it is washed with hot water at a temperature of 65 deg C . Explain this statement [3m] :
Answer :
1 . Silk is a protein fibre
2 . High temperatures will reduce the strength of the hydrogen bonds and disrupt the structure
3 . Denaturation of proteins occur
My answer :
1 . Proteins denature at high temperatures
2 . Three dimensional shape of protein molecule is altered
( my answer would only gain 1 mark . personally , I'd never have thought of hydrogen bonds , and wouldn't think that by mentioning the fact that silk is a protein fibre , 1 mark would be awarded as it's in the question ! )
In your answer , mentioning Amoeba sp. and humans is unnecessary . You've also rephrased your answer when you said that Amoeba sp. has higher TSA/V ratio , and humans have low TSA/V ratio . By mentioning higher , it's understood that the latter has a lower TSA/V ratio . Mentioning oxygen and carbon dioxide is also unnecessary .
When answering questions in all three sciences , I never care about grammar . In fact , if I can give a shorter answer with incorrect grammar , I'll gladly commit to it . For example , a student who wants to write in perfect grammar would answer like this :
The presence of respiratory inhibitor would inhibit cellular respiration , thus energy in the form of ATP will not be generated . This causes active transport to stop which causes the contractile vacuole of Amoeba sp. to stop functioning . Thus , Amoeba sp. dies due to excess water . [ I used to answer like this , in my first ever Biology exam when I was in form four .

]
How I'd answer now , and in SPM :
Respiratory inhibitor inhibits cellular respiration . Energy cannot be produced . Active transport stops . Contractive vacuole cannot contract . Amoeba sp. dies .
Simple , saves time , saves space , win-win situation as examiners would prefer shorter answers . They look at the key points only to award marks . No point coming up with coherent sentences to sound fancy .
But when in doubt , always , always write everything you know . A+ students do this . In fact , if you look at Kupasan Mutu Jawapan SPM published by LPM , Excellent candidates never give 'ngam-ngam' answers . They always give more than required . In many cases , doing this would save you from scoring zero marks in Section A . I've even asked seniors and they consistently gave the same advice : In Biology , ALWAYS WRITE MORE !
To become more familiar with questions like this , practising trial papers / past years is absolutely vital . There are many students who didn't read reference books and relied solely on trial / past years' mark schemes and scored A+ in SPM . Why ? Answers are usually succinct ( when you ignore atrocious grammar ) , you're able to remember keywords and points . Reference books have paragraphs and paragraphs of incessant rambling sometimes .
I think that would be it for now .
A quick share : When asked to compare in Physics P2 , I always write like this :
Frequency of wave in Diagram 1.1 > 2.1
Pressure at X > Y
I never write long sentences in Physics . If there's room for explanations using diagrams or equations , I'd gladly choose that . That's why I love Physics . You can answer using diagrams and symbols , provided that you label them .
For definition questions , there are 2 ways .
1 . Write complete sentence --- Impulse is the product of force and time
2 . Equation --- I = Ft , where I = Impulse , F = Force , t = time
That's about it for now . I'm actually taking the time off from studying to share everything with all of you . I see no point in keeping them to myself ; we're all facing the same battle , one way or another . I hope some of you would do the same too , if you have stuff to share . I actually am planning to take photos of my BM Module KOMSAS questions and share them here tomorrow or the day after . And the IMBAKUP technique I mentioned , I'll try snapping photos of the papers and share them here also .
This post has been edited by maximR: Oct 18 2013, 09:34 PM