QUOTE(albirri @ Apr 20 2006, 11:10 PM)
my senior went to scotland for her part 2 architecture...in differ, he said that doing architecture there is easier than in our university...
QUOTE(azarimy @ Apr 21 2006, 08:43 AM)
having studied in malaysia for a full degree, and later spending a few years studying about UK's system, i'd say, malaysian architectural syllabus is dead more difficult than the UK's counterparts. one of the reason is that the system that we use is severely outdated, where mostly are governed by the practitioners on what they want and how they want it.
however, it is to my understanding that UiTM is using a slightly different system, which i'm not so sure about. UTM used elaboration from the bauhaus (german i think) and ecole de beaux art (french), which also used in the UK. USM expanded this into their own specialization. UIA follows UTM's template, but geared it towards islamic architecture. UM took UK's system directly, so if u wanna feel the british system, u dont have to look further than UM.
i have no idea about UPM or UKM, coz they're still new, and have not had any graduates yet. all private colleges offering architecture course used australian curriculum, which is an expansion of the british curriculum.
interesting.... so our system is a little bit outdated... while hanging around with some architecture student (UiTM and UTM mostly) i found that some of them are mere zombies... they just 'hantam' on their designs and concepts...
they told that they just 'lost it'... at first they were really into it but after a while they just feel bored... 6 years right??? very long time to finish a first degree...
for these kind of students... what will their future in architecture be like???