[attachmentid=6057199]
I not sure can reach 1000km or not, here is the pic from they forum i have copied

www.hinganautoparts.com

Could anyone help check whether your car has the "Auto Door Lock" setting? Mine doesn't have. It should be under "Door Setting".

Hi guys. I cracked my honda insight windshield. How much does it cost nowadays. Thanks.

if got add in extra cover for windscreen insurance, no need void NCD.

Means original spark plug can last for 160km?

If within 5 yrs no claim, yes u saved rm3375. But if one time claim only within 5 yrs, ur savings will be lost and NCD may be gone if u claim.

Given the price that the windscreen is ex, insure can have a piece of mind or else one just need to take the risk.

If insight is like city that only cost rm1k, paying rm150 per year may not be worth it as rm1000 is an amount that one can easily afford anytime.

Losing NCD especially when I reached 55% can be very painful. It takes 5 yrs no claim just to accumulate it. The insight may drop in value along 5 yrs and premium for insurance will be lowered but the NCD will still be very useful especially if u buy a brand new expensive car.

but the problem to get the windsceen cover for almost 5k, you will need to pay 5000x15% = RM750 per year. with the value of the car now + max discount from the NCD, this rm750 is almost near to the insurance premium d..

it like a gamble...either u pay it n peace in mind or just pray hard nothing happen

i am referring to the value of NCD, if u are only at the year 1 or year 2 NCD, of course it makes no difference as the loss is limited.
or if u simply keep this insight for 10-20 years which will have value eventually of course again no issue.

to get 55% NCD, u need to ensure no claim within 5 yrs, it may not be an easy task to accumulate it. that's why it is the time that spent for this matters as well.

but most ppl will change cars eventually, and the NCD will become very important.

in the end like i said, if u happen to claim one time within one year, the loss of 5 yrs NCD does it worth rm3k++ premium spent for 5 yrs, it is up to debate.

my point of cheap windscreen no need cover becos in the event that u need to really change a rm1k windscreen, no one will claim their insurance for this, because it is a small amount that ppl can simply come out from their pocket. not because one will claim insurance.

What I comment is only applicable to ppl who change new car and much higher value car within 5 yrs.

NCD is totally different as the promo discount during sales u mentioned.

NCD is entitlement/award that is given to drivers that have not made a single claim up to a maximum of 5 yrs time that offset 55% it is applicable all time to a driver's premium that need to pay anytime and it is transferable. It may sound simple but it may not be so easy to accumulate the 55% NCD as one need to 'ensure' nothing happen on the road for 5 yrs, as in real life road is always unpredictable, even u are not at fault, u can barely ensure others do.

No matter new or old cars, drivers are to pay the premium for insurance and this NCD applies always.
If u just simply treat the NCD as a 'discount' to ur premium while ur premium is low because ur car value is little for a 10, 20 or 30 yrs car, of course u will not value NCD. As the 'discount' that u refer to is little because the 'discount' u saved is little simply because ur car has no value. Or simply because ur current NCD is low for example 15% only or so.

Insight windscreen is ex, no matter how many years of cars it is, it still cost that much and given the weak RM. price may change to even higher. One can definitely opt out from windscreen cover due to reasons above. Again insurance purpose is to allow one to spend little to cover the higher cost that needed to fork out during incidents. One may treat this as not buying as a saving of not spending. Again, u have forgotten that u have been bearing the 'risks' over years. Ur mentioned 'saving' on 'spending' is actually an exchange of the risks u bear and not simply nothing. U have placed ur 'valuable' NCD for example at stake. Getting things insurance one has to pay a small premium to protect higher cost that one has to fork out later, this applies to car, medical and everything too. If nothing happen, of course one can claim that his decision for not buying the insurance in the past has translated into his savings. But insurance does not work when one only wants or plans to buy when something happened, one cannot even purchase an insurance to cover him when something had happened.

Of course, again it comes back to the same thing I said, if like ur case, NCD has no value to u either u NCD is low or simply because u do not change car so the premium u paid yearly is neglectable, then yes, the windscreen coverage is definitely not relevant to u in the first place but it definitely not for everyone.

How much is the bulb? I dunno where to buy original

nope...
half lifespan...

Can I get something brighter than the original stock bulbs? The current ones really dim
But I don't want too powerful ones that will burn down my car though 😅

i need to change my wipers

Honda said silicon ones are not good, and i should use rubber?

anyone used silicon and what are the dimensions? my previous silicon ones were superb on my previous car though

any recommendations too?

Take myself as an example. It is the same that Honda is the brand i own now, but i won't go for japanese brand again for the next car but continental just simply because i do not forsee myself to stuck at the same brand or same segment car always given that one's salary will grow progressively over years which the car that he can own should be always better. When car price is higher, obviously the insurance will be higher, the NCD will make more significant impact here as it is on proportion (55%) instead of fixed amount like the windscreen cover.

Insurance is meant for those who are not well to do. One may think that insurance is for those rich this is totally a silly thought. If come to think, if a poor person who in need of claim for incidents etc but he does not have protection, his hard earn cash will be wipe up straightaway while for rich they can easily fork out cash to pay for it without impact. Therefore it is actually the other way round instead, the poorer the more in need of the insurance for protection.