Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.18, D5200 announced, what next? D400?

views
     
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 05:17 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted image
DSC_0232 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

What char i this>?
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 06:14 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Dec 24 2012, 05:59 PM)
Many thanks for the reply sifu, appreciate it!  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
Yeah, typo, should be 18-105mm haha ... but this one is DX lens right?
A quick search through the Nikon webpage and I found these, which are sort of within budget @___@:

1. AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED (the one you mentioned right? biggrin.gif)
2. AF 24-85mm f/2.8-4D IF
3. AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR (I think this is the kit lens) laugh.gif

I am not really sure what's the differences between all these, apart from the price lol..
I was wondering whether sifus can give a little bit of comments on these lenses?
Thanks thanks  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
*
bt once u're into FF, i think u would look into those primes instead..
cheapo 50mm 1.4, or the 35mm 1.4.. cz those 24-120 n other zoom lens arent as sharp as the primes..
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 07:29 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted image
DSC_0228 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr
blush.gif
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 09:13 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Dec 24 2012, 09:09 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Rock Seems to be your subject. But too many rocks, dunno which 1 is the superstar.

Suggest to use 1 rock as subject and neighboring rock as dancer and the sea as backdrop.

Dancing............. tongue.gif

Handheld or tripod. If tripod, can make the water.. softer..

Shoot lower maybe.

Not gonna comment about focus.

The photo makes me curious about the Horizon....and sky....

Still with some post processing, it could still work.. but thats another story.
*
thumbup.gif thumbup.gif thumbup.gif superb comment
super sifu using leica..
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 09:15 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Dec 24 2012, 09:13 PM)
i use 6D only.
*
6Dmark2
f5calvin
post Dec 24 2012, 09:28 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

user posted image
DSC_0222 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 10:04 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 25 2012, 09:09 AM)
All roaming at the same time xD But you tarak the Zabimaru wielding Rilakkuma  flex.gif
*
haha..tarak tarak..
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 12:17 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


Merry Xmas guys~



This post has been edited by f5calvin: Dec 25 2012, 12:18 PM
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 04:31 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted image
DSC_0306 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 04:59 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


by the way, i think tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC is sharp in the middle, bt very soft at side n corners..
so whenever i see a photo that's sharp, i feel like so delighted!
lol..
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 09:47 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(celciuz @ Dec 25 2012, 09:40 PM)
Unlikely for the corner to be 'blur' due to lens... why? you're on DX sensor... the little area used by DX won't affect that much like FX sensor + FX lens.
*
bt this is DX lens..so will actually get blur like hell d..my lens i noe lar.. bt then i cant really see the picture in larger size, so me myself dno wat problem KS facing..
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 09:52 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(teetaatee @ Dec 25 2012, 09:50 PM)
i have a non VC version... not really like the lens already.. haha
*
non VC performs wayy better than VC one..
bt VC one looks more pro cz of bigger filter size..lol!
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 10:56 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(bb100 @ Dec 25 2012, 10:44 PM)
f/2.8 also can create bokeh's effect? drool.gif You are amazing, man! Can please tell me the settings you used to snap this photo? Thanks.
*
user posted image
DSC_0198 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

any lens can also do bokeh.. jz go closest possible to the subject.
btw the white thing jutting out is so annoying


Added on December 25, 2012, 10:57 pmoh btw see what i've got here

user posted image
Sifu doing his shots by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr

This post has been edited by f5calvin: Dec 25 2012, 10:57 PM
f5calvin
post Dec 25 2012, 11:06 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Dec 25 2012, 11:05 PM)
Crossing leg technique.
*
got such name for it ar haha..
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 02:36 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted image
Sabrina.Ashe.LoL by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr
nites..
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 11:41 AM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 26 2012, 03:01 AM)
hmmmm....maybe i expect too much, but when i zoom-in in lightroom is picture is more blur than what i see hmm.gif
gt pics of my friend who cosplaying the vocaloid?
*
here
user posted image
DSC_0325 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr


Added on December 26, 2012, 2:36 pm
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


CY why din get ultra wide Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8? too bad cant fix filter..

This post has been edited by f5calvin: Dec 26 2012, 02:36 PM
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 02:46 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


QUOTE(amduser @ Dec 26 2012, 02:43 PM)
i heard 14-24mm got very bad distortion leh...

thanks for the picture, on behave of my friends biggrin.gif

same angle with one of my picture of them as well laugh.gif
*
not really ar..16-35 has more distortion..
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/images1/1...mm/compared.htm
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 08:05 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Why ur iso use 6400?
i think flower a lil overexpose.. make bg darker would be better to make flower stand out perhaps..

This post has been edited by f5calvin: Dec 26 2012, 08:05 PM
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 08:28 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


user posted image
DSC_0371 by Calvin Kohlz, on Flickr
f5calvin
post Dec 26 2012, 08:52 PM

starsssss
Group Icon
Elite
1,557 posts

Joined: Dec 2011


Btw, CY, u were a tennis kaki?

6 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0390sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 12:42 AM