QUOTE(cowithgun @ Oct 2 2012, 08:11 PM)
not how i understand it:
- more MF does not mean higher change to get iLvl63
- item level determined by item table. based on Act for MP0. based on another table for MP1 and above.
- MF does not affect rolls. ie: high MF can still get +12 resist to all.
- MF affects number of affixes. ie: Higher MF can give more affixes; 6 random rolls, instead of 4
- item level does not affect number of affixes; ie: item level 58 can have 6 random rolls
Source:
http://www.diablofans.com/topic/57939-magi...stical-insight/Thanks for linking that page, was looking for it.
I'll just put what was concluded at para 6.4 Number of affixes on rare items as a function of MF:-
It was stated :"Put another way: You will find more rare items with more MF and those rare items will have a chance to roll out 4A, 5A and 6A, but the relative distribution of 4A, 5A and 6A are not changing by
significant amounts by increasing MF.
(emphasis is mine).
At 7.Summary, it was concluded:-
•Magic find does not increase the number of items found (aka not effective on quantity).
My reading of that means that MF does not affect the number of items dropping from the pack (be it white, blue of yellow). Put it this way, if the pack if selected to drop 6 items, thats it..MF will no increase the number of item dropping. Perhaps I wasnt clear on my statement earlier, when I said drops I was referring to rare drops (heck no one cares for blue or white)

Also at 7
•Early results indicate that MF does increase the number of affixes on rare items, however, the effect appears to be minimal and close to neglible for the standard elite drops. It does, however, appear to have a prominent effect on the NV rare drop.
My reading is that, MF does effect rolls of afflixes but the effect is very small. However, it appears that the rolls on NV drop (the guaranteed drop) is co-related to MF.
Well, thats my reading hence I am not saying I am absolutely right (unlike someone we know). but I am all ears ..
This post has been edited by gladfly: Oct 3 2012, 01:05 PM