I thought the 50mm lenses from Olympus are macro lenses?

yes, u r right my 1 is Zuiko Digital ED 50mm f2.0 Macro cost me $1900 + 100+ for xtened 2 yrs warranty. But 1 thing for sure is those kit len cannot compare with this pro-grade len. Well i think it's wut u paid n wut u get la . another reason is i couldn't get 4:3 third party len like sigma at KL / Sel area, i guess here olympus not so popular :SIEN:

Nice shot you got there on the dragonfly

The #1 shot, left side leaf is a blocker and a lil bit closer would be cool
#4 is nice

thanks for viewing, for pic 1 i wish i could get more closer, but too bad the dragonfly is in the middle of the water pond, i already stretched out my arms to snap the pic lor.

thanks for the comment will try harder next time . (curi from Mr.richx slogan )

Ahh icic, it's still pretty cool
We both gambateh

NBTShoot macro again
#1


#2


#3


#4 feather again


#5 feather again n' again


thanks for viewing~

i like pic #1 ; issit grain or?

no~~~definite not grain, i also dunno wut it call~
any1 know?

What grain? I don't see any grain? At most some JPEG compression blockiness.

The ZD 50/2 Macro is a very sharp lens, I heard. You can use it to shoot a variety of subjects, but the focal length can limit its use.

It's called lalang. Haha...

I like #1, the soft look is nice

yes, it is a very sharp len, min focal length is 0.79 ft or 0.24 m (approx 7-8 cm).
for low light environment, it's abit difficult to use AF, some time i could'nt get the focus point, so i have to use MF.


haha, i think it's from Lalang family la


the day i shoot this pic the weather is not so good, so i adjust abit at PS just to make it brighter. glad u like it, but this pic still can be better.

some of my experiment shots, feel free to give some comment

#1


#2


This post has been edited by WildPiew: May 9 2006, 06:14 PM

waa...nice try.. wish to see ur portrait experiment shots ya..

1 flash 1 no flash?..really clear..hehe..

Kinda noticed that majority of your shots seems to be in low light situation. What ISO you normally use for the pics? Seems really clean to me.. impressed

The first one looks scarier
Cuz of the 2 shade lighting. It looks like grining evilly and the dim light on er... "special" bow-tie (?) gave it a mysterious look

But the 2nd pic, not much of dark feel.

imho

its Jack Skellington. dude.

Haha this is one dude out to prove that Olympus 4/3rd can do well in low-light!

Oh man, i wish my Nikon D70s can give me such clean images during high ISOs..