QUOTE(nazq @ Jan 17 2013, 08:15 PM)
Comment from a lecturer regarding the video issue:-
I'm guessing this is a female lecturer? But seriously... her command of English is quite bad, especially the grammar part. A lecturer mang, supposed to be good.» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
.....after watching the YouTube of the SWIM dialogue in UUM yesterday...my conclusion is that the gal (Bavani) who was asking the questions and later trying to lecture the moderator (Sharifah Zohra) was actually at fault.....I think her behaviours was definitely provocative and unprofessional.....probably coz her background studies ar related to Law & Government but that did not give her an opportunities to voice her opinions in such a way.....it would not provoke the moderator and probably most of the audience in the hall if she, as the future lawyer or law enforcer, acting in a professional manner....to me bringing an issues that we know the answers or questioning the good things, that as students already enjoyed such as PTPTN... ar a reversed 'childish opinions' rather than forwarding the positive feedback from others.....emotion too took the toll over the dialogue and that really reflect the immaturity of her as future leader in the country.....why not she asked in a descent way by not pointing the fingers around with unacceptable intonation to the person ur asking....? didn't that reflect the actual half-past six mentality...? as to all my students and of course the ex-students....learn from here....especially those who ar working...maturity in asking sensitive questions is the priority of all....never assume to be a hero or heroine and getting to be popular but in actual facts ur just a garbage in this campus....pls....act maturedly and professionally without hurting other people sentiments.....as for that moderator (Sharifah Zohra)....this is another stupid issue....just coz ur a lawyer and hv closed connections with high level people in the country....it doesn't give u an opportunity to downgrade the students by giving examples that can disgrace them in public....thisnis the sign of corkiness as a professional so call lawyer....u should cool down and give a sisterly or motherly (if ur married) to reprimand any of them which u think might offend u....I could agree most of the facts that u lashed at that Bavani but I could not agree at all to see ur attitudes as almost similar to her....I could forgive Bavani coz she might not as professional as ur but not u.....sorry to say that.....another idiot that I would like to touch on was the Chairman (I've been told is our UUM MPP President?) of the dialogue....as Chairman ur supposedly in control of the dialogue and not keeping urself liked 'tikus' and 'bisu' through out the whole session....in this case u seemed to hv no control to stop either Bavani or Sharifah from engaging and insulting each other....next time don't be the Chairman..get someone else as ur almost like a 'pondan' sitting infront of the crowds.......sorry to say that again but ur indeed liked that......by the end of the day when the issues were exploded...the one that receive the hardest knocked was UUM....I feel sad to say we ar not that 'teruk' as outsiders might think off.....so....I hope if this case being the talked of the own again....pls challenge them for the sake of our UUM image....we ar better than any of them...prove to them we're the best....yes..we're......cheers....
Jan 17 2013, 11:12 PM

Quote
0.0249sec
1.03
6 queries
GZIP Disabled