it's basically catenagio or catenaccio.
highly successful for Italy previously and greece otto rehagel in 2004
4-4-2 and beyond: We talk strategy here, Formations and tactics used in matches
4-4-2 and beyond: We talk strategy here, Formations and tactics used in matches
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 01:40 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
448 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
it's basically catenagio or catenaccio.
highly successful for Italy previously and greece otto rehagel in 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 06:28 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(Rhicebowl @ Sep 14 2012, 12:51 AM) Lol wtf. Is this north or south korean formation? And when was this? Why does this tactic suck north korea's formation in wc2010Looking at this, it does seems like its a very good formation lol. 2-1 vs brazil in the first match ... looks like it'll work then 7-0 vs portugal ... QUOTE(syazwan @ Sep 14 2012, 01:40 AM) it's basically catenagio or catenaccio. greece played with a back 4 in 2004highly successful for Italy previously and greece otto rehagel in 2004 This post has been edited by spursfan: Sep 14 2012, 08:36 AM |
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 06:34 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
77 posts Joined: Jul 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 08:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
there are 2 big issues with the north korea formation
1. no width for attacks. transitions from defense to attack is hard because players in advanced positions are narrow when defending. 2. when you play against teams with only 1 striker, you are overmanned in defense. that results in less players for attack. strategies going forward becomes limited. ----------------------------- QUOTE(Therapy88 @ Sep 14 2012, 06:34 AM) the ajax in 1995 (van gaal) is very different compared to the north korean formation. 1. for starters, it was more of a 1-2-1-2-3-1. 2. instead of 3 central defenders, van gaal fielded 2 central defenders and a libero. 3. wingers 4. van gaal did not use any fullbacks. instead, the central midfielders were tasked to track the opposition wingers. 5. van gaal's attacking midfielder (the center of the 3) helped out in midfield when '4.' happens. north korea's guy was more of a trequartitsta. he didn't have any defensive duties. here's an article written exactly 2 years ago (a coincidence) on ajax's strategy vs ac milan http://timhi.wordpress.com/2010/09/14/ajax-1995/ |
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 09:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
448 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(spursfan @ Sep 14 2012, 06:28 AM) north korea's formation in wc2010 catenaccio is not just abt how many defence u have etc etc2-1 vs brazil in the first match ... looks like it'll work then 7-0 vs portugal ... greece played with a back 4 in 2004 Catenaccio, the Greek way http://www.eamonn.com/2004/07/catenaccio_the_greek_way_1.htm QUOTE And what about Greece winning the Euro 2004? Although not a classical Catenaccio by any means, the salient features of man marking, using sweepers were all present in their epic run in the tournament. http://italy.worldcupblog.org/italy/the-catenaccio-myth.html Added on September 14, 2012, 9:16 pm QUOTE(spursfan @ Sep 14 2012, 08:25 PM) there are 2 big issues with the north korea formation if u dont have quality players upfront..why bother to follow others?1. no width for attacks. transitions from defense to attack is hard because players in advanced positions are narrow when defending. 2. when you play against teams with only 1 striker, you are overmanned in defense. that results in less players for attack. strategies going forward becomes limited. good coaches should know what's the best for the team according to what they have. Rajagobal certainly didnt use Tiki Taka or false no.9 because we dont have players who can pass the ball well if it works for them(N.Korea) until they qualify to World Cup..means the tactic works well with them..(altho kena belasah big goals vs Portugal) This post has been edited by syazwan: Sep 14 2012, 09:16 PM |
|
|
Sep 14 2012, 11:50 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(syazwan @ Sep 14 2012, 09:14 PM) catenaccio is not just abt how many defence u have etc etc i'm not familiar with the catenaccio ... what is it's characteristics? ... what differentiates it from other defensive systems?Catenaccio, the Greek way http://www.eamonn.com/2004/07/catenaccio_the_greek_way_1.htm http://italy.worldcupblog.org/italy/the-catenaccio-myth.html QUOTE(syazwan @ Sep 14 2012, 09:14 PM) if u dont have quality players upfront..why bother to follow others? that's true ... i don't have the quality of my opponent. i might as well roll over and die. - this line does not exist in sports.good coaches should know what's the best for the team according to what they have. Rajagobal certainly didnt use Tiki Taka or false no.9 because we dont have players who can pass the ball well if it works for them(N.Korea) until they qualify to World Cup..means the tactic works well with them..(altho kena belasah big goals vs Portugal) |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2012, 03:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(syazwan @ Sep 14 2012, 01:40 AM) it's basically catenagio or catenaccio. highly successful for Italy previously and greece otto rehagel in 2004 QUOTE(spursfan @ Sep 14 2012, 11:50 PM) i'm not familiar with the catenaccio ... what is it's characteristics? ... what differentiates it from other defensive systems? Actually the last catenaccio style used in major match was Greece in 2004 when they won the Euro at the time. Sweeper played a role here. Defensive football doesn't mean it's a catenaccio we used to know way back to 60's and 70's. They not restricted to single formation but probably best known for a sweeper operated just in front of goalkeeper and behind four defender and closing the opponent down with man-marking (sometimes double marking) system it is used with great succes by Helenio Herrera that guided Inter to Sirie A titles and European cups. But later Total Futball by Ajax gave blow to this kind of catenaccio.that's true ... i don't have the quality of my opponent. i might as well roll over and die. - this line does not exist in sports. This post has been edited by gruntz99: Sep 16 2012, 03:49 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Sep 16 2012, 06:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(gruntz99 @ Sep 16 2012, 03:49 PM) Actually the last catenaccio style used in major match was Greece in 2004 when they won the Euro at the time. Sweeper played a role here. Defensive football doesn't mean it's a catenaccio we used to know way back to 60's and 70's. They not restricted to single formation but probably best known for a sweeper operated just in front of goalkeeper and behind four defender and closing the opponent down with man-marking (sometimes double marking) system it is used with great succes by Helenio Herrera that guided Inter to Sirie A titles and European cups. But later Total Futball by Ajax gave blow to this kind of catenaccio. i am so confusedyou tell me it's sweeper behind 4 defender ... but your diagram got oni 1 guy behind 3 plus, according to zonalmarking, it looks more like a standard back 4 ... ![]() even if the 2 cd is played as 1 with man marking and another to cover, that's just like a normal CD pairing (vidic - ferdinand) ... unless, u call a ball playing defender a sweeper ... how is that catenaccio? ... i tarak faham liao ... This post has been edited by spursfan: Sep 16 2012, 06:37 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2012, 06:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: Sep 2012 |
QUOTE(spursfan @ Sep 16 2012, 06:34 PM) i am so confused No, what I mean is catenaccio have a sweeper whatever formation it takes, the picture above use four defenders with ONE SWEEPER operating behind the three defenders and just in front of goalkeeper. There is also 5-3-2 formation used which five defenders but one sweeper behind them cleaning all the ball while the other four man marking the opponents.you tell me it's sweeper behind 4 defender ... but your diagram got oni 1 guy behind 3 plus, according to zonalmarking, it looks more like a standard back 4 ... ![]() even if the 2 cd is played as 1 with man marking and another to cover, that's just like a normal CD pairing (vidic - ferdinand) ... unless, u call a ball playing defender a sweeper ... how is that catenaccio? ... i tarak faham liao ... Actually sweeper role don't really exist today. Because the man marking system MARKED certain player (Four example in the catenaccio system the right CD only the striker while the left CD) so tight but the normal defender today just mark in the zonal. This post has been edited by gruntz99: Sep 16 2012, 06:55 PM |
|
|
Sep 16 2012, 10:28 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
110 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(gruntz99 @ Sep 16 2012, 06:51 PM) No, what I mean is catenaccio have a sweeper whatever formation it takes, the picture above use four defenders with ONE SWEEPER operating behind the three defenders and just in front of goalkeeper. There is also 5-3-2 formation used which five defenders but one sweeper behind them cleaning all the ball while the other four man marking the opponents. the zonal marking pictars look more like a cd pair instead of cd - sweeper ... since the match was from 8 years ago, i dun think i can remember the positioning of the defenders ... so, i'll just trust zonalmarking ...Actually sweeper role don't really exist today. Because the man marking system MARKED certain player (Four example in the catenaccio system the right CD only the striker while the left CD) so tight but the normal defender today just mark in the zonal. sweeper died because of the offside rule ... kinda hard to setup offside trap if there is a sweeper behind the defenders ... |
| Change to: | 0.0211sec
0.82
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 03:28 PM |