Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 4-4-2 and beyond: We talk strategy here, Formations and tactics used in matches

views
     
TSgruntz99
post Sep 11 2012, 04:32 PM, updated 14y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
Let's talk about strategies, formations, tactics used in a football matches.

This post has been edited by gruntz99: Sep 13 2012, 05:40 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
xMika
post Sep 11 2012, 04:41 PM

我爱中島美嘉
******
Senior Member
1,553 posts

Joined: Oct 2008



Play 1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1 formation line up all the way in straight line with kangkang leg then pass ole style to score ~ YAY !
TSgruntz99
post Sep 11 2012, 05:20 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
Many people seem underestimate the importance of strategies but actually this is where the ingredients of succes in football comes.

As Mourinho has said,

Look, if I have a triangle in midfield – Claude Makelele behind and two others just in front – I will always have an advantage against a pure 4-4-2 where the central midfielders are side by side. That’s because I will always have an extra man. It starts with Makelele, who is between the lines. If nobody comes to him he can see the whole pitch and has time. If he gets closed down it means one of the two other central midfielders is open. If they are closed down and the other team’s wingers come inside to help, it means there is space now for us on the flank, either for our own wingers or for our full-backs. There is nothing a pure 4-4-2 can do to stop things’.

Talk about latest matches later, so busy now icon_rolleyes.gif
nouruddines
post Sep 11 2012, 06:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
236 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
From: Azkaban



Yes mourinho wub.gif
gry
post Sep 11 2012, 07:05 PM

Red Warriors
*****
Senior Member
780 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Seri Kembangan, Serdang


I think in Malaysia, local coach only know using 4-4-2, not brave enough to try 4-2-3-1, or maybe false nine
aressandro10
post Sep 11 2012, 07:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
QUOTE(gry @ Sep 11 2012, 07:05 PM)
I think in Malaysia, local coach only know using 4-4-2, not brave enough to try 4-2-3-1, or maybe false nine
*
maybe because malaysian players are too.. simple minded......

to play other tactics, you need to have the ability to think more than one thing at once..
syazwan
post Sep 11 2012, 07:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
448 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(gry @ Sep 11 2012, 07:05 PM)
I think in Malaysia, local coach only know using 4-4-2, not brave enough to try 4-2-3-1, or maybe false nine
*
Many local teams are using 1 lone striker right now.
With another one supporting the main striker.
It's not the matter whether the coach is brave or not..it's the matter of whether the player can accommodate to that tactic.

no use if wan to use false nine or whtever if players dont understand the role, not capable to put some strings of passes oso laugh.gif
syazwan
post Sep 11 2012, 07:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
448 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(aressandro10 @ Sep 11 2012, 07:19 PM)
maybe because malaysian players are too.. simple minded......

to play other tactics, you need to have the ability to think more than one thing at once..
*
plus dari kecik dah diajar main 4-4-2

even time aku train budak2 aku supaya full back sentiasa berhampiran dgn keeper sewaktu goal kick so they can collect the ball & play from behind..tapi dah mmg budaya & rasa cuak nervous tu dah lekat dari kecik..keeper akan hentam kuat2 & suruh midfield yg ketot2 berebut bola kat tgh.
tu aku suruh buat time frenly pun xleh nak buat..ye lah nothing to lose kan..
kalau tournament jgn harap lerr

doh.gif

This post has been edited by syazwan: Sep 11 2012, 07:24 PM
ayanami_tard
post Sep 11 2012, 07:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
well it partly down to the player as well. most of them trained with standard 4-4-2 formation. there are few gaffers that are willing to use formations such as Haji Irfan Bakti,Bojan Hodak,even our U-23 coach,Mr Ong Kim Swee.

the advantage of 4-4-2 is that it offers versatility in width,midfield and forward,and,depending on the player chosen, can be switched from 4-5-1 to 4-2-4. as explained by Mr Roy Hogdson

QUOTE
    “The back four gives you the best possibilities of covering the width of the pitch defensively, and it also gives you great options, in my opinion, to get the the full-backs forward…one can go forward and the other three can shuttle across and you’re still playing with three defenders. When you play with three defenders, you lose that possibility.

    The other six players? One could discuss. There’s no doubt you need one forward…you need a point of reference…if you play with two of them, you have the added advantage that whoever receives the ball has someone in close support at all times, and if balls are going to be played forward, you’ve got someone to threat the back of the defence. If you take him (the second striker) out, the threat to the back of the defence has to come from the midfield, you need midfield players bursting forward. It’s interesting to play with two – though these days many teams are playing with them vertically, rather than alongside each other.

    The central midfielders do an important job for you, they’re going to protect the back four, and they’re also going to be the catalysts for attacks. The wide players are the ones you’re looking for to use spaces.

    With 4-4-2, you’ve got ‘twos’ all over the field. I would always be looking to find a team that can play with a back four. Amongst the front six there a lot more options.”


http://www.uefa.com/trainingground/coaches...e#tg_formations

other advantage of 4-4-2 is that it utilize the advantage of having tandem striker.this is where wide midfielder(those who hug the byline more) become more effective than a winger in the mould of Nani.

in the end,it all about the player.even with exotic formations,if the players couldn't execute it,it's useless too.
SUSRhicebowl
post Sep 11 2012, 09:53 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2012


I think strategies and formation apart, having a coach that can pinpoint oppositions weakneses and apply changes to gain advantage is what defines a quality team. Surely strenght of players are important as well but exploiting loopholes in opositions formation and tactics plays a big role.
spursfan
post Sep 12 2012, 07:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
442 used to be common ... when teams face off, you have the midfielders cancelling each other ... that means the player with the most time on the ball is the full backs ... that explains why offensive fullbacks are so valued ...

to counter that, teams started to push the fullbacks back by pushing the wingers up front ... the players at the sides cancel each other and no advantage can be obtained from the sides ...

now, the battle on the pitch moves to the center ... you have the standard creator - destroyer combo ... when 2 goes against 2, the better pair wins ... when 2 goes against 3, the 2 loses ... therefore, the team with the 2 midfield have to introduce another midfielder or the second striker have to drop back to even the odds ... that's how we get to the current style of 3 midfielders ...

of course, you have people who try to out think the rest by fielding false 9 instead of a regular forward ... the most prominent is barca/spain ... it is possible that will be the future of football ... i hope not, coz that's a boring future ...


QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Sep 11 2012, 07:31 PM)
well it partly down to the player as well. most of them trained with standard 4-4-2 formation. there are few gaffers that are willing to use formations such as Haji Irfan Bakti,Bojan Hodak,even our U-23 coach,Mr Ong Kim Swee.

the advantage of 4-4-2 is that it offers versatility in width,midfield and forward,and,depending on the player chosen, can be switched from 4-5-1 to 4-2-4. as explained by Mr Roy Hogdson
http://www.uefa.com/trainingground/coaches...e#tg_formations

other advantage of 4-4-2 is that it utilize the advantage of having tandem striker.this is where wide midfielder(those who hug the byline more) become more effective than a winger in the mould of Nani.

in the end,it all about the player.even with exotic formations,if the players couldn't execute it,it's useless too.
*

442 with a flat midfield line is pretty much dead ... if you have only 3 bands, there are too much space between the lines to be exploited ...

nowadays, it's either a "2 dm 442" (less space between the lines) or a 4411 (second striker drop off when not in possession) ...

-------------------------------------

btw, box to box midfielders is dead

This post has been edited by spursfan: Sep 12 2012, 07:07 PM
gry
post Sep 12 2012, 08:31 PM

Red Warriors
*****
Senior Member
780 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Seri Kembangan, Serdang


for me, the best formation right now is 4-2-3-1 because I love when 2 defensive midfield in team because the others 4 players will have so much freedom to attack.
TSgruntz99
post Sep 13 2012, 04:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
QUOTE(gry @ Sep 12 2012, 08:31 PM)
for me, the best formation right now is 4-2-3-1  because I love when 2 defensive midfield in team because the others 4 players will have so much freedom to attack.
*
Yess, 4-2-3-1 (could be modified 4-4-2 or 4-3-3) is a good strategy allowing 2 holding midfielder to defend and at the same time two fullback go forward helping attack. Real Madrid used this almost all matches last season with great success.

This post has been edited by gruntz99: Sep 13 2012, 04:56 PM
SUSRhicebowl
post Sep 13 2012, 06:32 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2012


3-2-1-2-1-1
3 cb
2 wb
1 dcm
2 md with one att mid
1 forward

This is the best strategy.
aressandro10
post Sep 13 2012, 06:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
121 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
4-1-3-2 diablo was the best ever for me.
SUSRhicebowl
post Sep 13 2012, 06:44 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(aressandro10 @ Sep 13 2012, 06:40 PM)
4-1-3-2 diablo was the best ever for me.
*
What is 4 1 3 2 diablo?? Got murcialago?
spursfan
post Sep 13 2012, 07:14 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
110 posts

Joined: Jan 2009
QUOTE(Rhicebowl @ Sep 13 2012, 06:32 PM)
3-2-1-2-1-1
3 cb
2 wb
1 dcm
2 md with one att mid
1 forward

This is the best strategy.
*

basically this

user posted image
north korea is best korea rclxm9.gif

edit: this tactic sucks laugh.gif

This post has been edited by spursfan: Sep 13 2012, 07:14 PM
Icahn
post Sep 13 2012, 07:31 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
21 posts

Joined: Jun 2011
QUOTE(gry @ Sep 12 2012, 08:31 PM)
for me, the best formation right now is 4-2-3-1  because I love when 2 defensive midfield in team because the others 4 players will have so much freedom to attack.
*
This is the formation used by Zac Japan.

They have been raping lesser Asian teams completely by using this formation... smile.gif


Added on September 13, 2012, 7:33 pmKagawa, Honda and Okazaki behind Tanadari Lee/Havenaar.

Not to mention the highly dangerous Nagatomo, roaming back and forth in the wing ala Roberto Carlos...

This post has been edited by Icahn: Sep 13 2012, 07:33 PM
SUSRhicebowl
post Sep 14 2012, 12:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: May 2012


QUOTE(spursfan @ Sep 13 2012, 07:14 PM)
basically this

user posted image
north korea is best korea rclxm9.gif

edit: this tactic sucks laugh.gif
*
Lol wtf. Is this north or south korean formation? And when was this? Why does this tactic suck laugh.gif

Looking at this, it does seems like its a very good formation lol.
ayanami_tard
post Sep 14 2012, 01:21 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
40 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: under the moonlight
you're flooding the defence at the expence of midfield

basically you're only playing at the third half with the formation

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0235sec    0.49    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 04:05 AM