Aug 19 2013, 09:25 AM
QUOTE(yok70 @ Aug 19 2013, 02:58 AM)
Now, consider Pavreit for your case.
You bought at 1.56, that's 4.68% gross yield, 4.2% net yield (10% tax today, we assume gomen keeps this policy).
The difference is 2.3%, that's 54% growth.
If we assume 5 years later, rate hits 4.5%.
A rough calculation: 72/8 = 9. Here, means average of 8% income growth for 9 years, capital double. So we take 50% instead of double, and we get 4.5 years.
Meaning, if Pavreit able to growth its income 8% each year continuously for 5 years, its yield to reach 6.5% will be highly possible. If that happen, you have no loss at all, and you still getting dividend throughout this 5 years. Still much better than putting in FD or even bond funds, isn't it?
How do you come up with 2.3%, 54%, 72/8?You bought at 1.56, that's 4.68% gross yield, 4.2% net yield (10% tax today, we assume gomen keeps this policy).
The difference is 2.3%, that's 54% growth.
If we assume 5 years later, rate hits 4.5%.
A rough calculation: 72/8 = 9. Here, means average of 8% income growth for 9 years, capital double. So we take 50% instead of double, and we get 4.5 years.
Meaning, if Pavreit able to growth its income 8% each year continuously for 5 years, its yield to reach 6.5% will be highly possible. If that happen, you have no loss at all, and you still getting dividend throughout this 5 years. Still much better than putting in FD or even bond funds, isn't it?
Quote
0.0446sec
0.85
7 queries
GZIP Disabled