Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sandy Bridge Overclocking V2 | 2500K/2600K/2700K, The Journey Continues Here... :)

views
     
TSowikh84
post Aug 14 2012, 12:51 PM, updated 12y ago

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Sandy Bridge OC Thread V2

Our old V1 Thread has exceeded 2500 posts so this is the V2 thread of Intel LGA1155 aka Sandy Bridge (SB) overclocking thread.
Please share your benchmark, stability, guides etc...

user posted image
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

user posted image

Latest BIOS:
LINK

BCLK
measured in MHz
Base Clock Increasing your base clock increases your CPU core clocks, memory speed, QPI frequency, and North Bridge Frequency
-Similar to the older FSB “Front Side Bus”
BCLK x CPU ratio = CPU frequency
Adjust the BCLK frequency to overclock the CPU speed!

Multiplier
-Multiplier is a ratio that determines the clock speed for the CPU based on the multiplication of the BCLK. For example, your CPU multiplier determines what your CPU core clock speed is using this formula: Base clock * multiplier
There are also multipliers for Memory frequency, QPI speed, and North Bridge (UCLK) frequency.

PCIE
measured in MHz
Periferal Connect Interface Express
-Video Graphics communication link
when overclocking, increasing the PCI-E clock can help with stability when above 200MHz BCLK

CPU Voltage
AKA -VCore this is your processor core voltage. Increasing this will supply your CPU cores the power they need to operate at higher frequencies.
Central Processing Unit
-Processor core voltage
DO NOT EXCEED 1.55v

IMC Voltage
"VTT" or "QPI" Increasing this will supply the power needed for the IMC (North Bridge) to operate at higher frequencies.
- L3 shared cache
- memory controller
- processor I/O power rail
Since memory controller frequency is dependent on BCLK, the higher the BCLK, the higher the IMC voltage required. DO NOT Exceed 1.45v

DRAM Voltage
DDR3 Random Access Memory
-Memory Voltage
Since DRAM speed is linked to the BCLK the higher the BCLK the higher the DRAM Voltage is needed

CPU PLL Voltage
PLL: Phase Locked Loop voltage
- Processor/IMC(Integrated Memory Controller)/other internal clock cycles
- Clock multiplying of processor is provided by an internal Phase Locked Loop
Does not have a significant effect on CPU Speed, -DO NOT Exceed 1.90v

PCH Voltage
Platform Controller Hub
- main I/O interface for CPU
- display connectivity
- Integrated Audio
- power management features
- Storage features
The higher the CPU frequency, the harder the I/O (input and output) has to work so there is higher power consumption and more heat is generated, raising the CPU temperature. The PCH voltage needs to be increased in order to stabilize I/O signaling. DO NOT EXCEED 1.25v

OC Guides & Tips:
LGA1155 Overclocking Glossary
Asus P67/Z68 OC Guides
Asus P67 OC Guides

Latest Overclocking Programs, System Info, Benchmarking, & Stability Tools
LINK - credit to stasio

Monitoring Tools:
CPU-Z 1.64
RealTemp 3.70
ReadlTemp TI
CoreTemp 1.0 RC5
HWiNFO 4.14-1880
Mem TweakIT 1.01.7
CPU-Tweaker 2.0 Beta 15

Stability/Stressing Tools: - Please use Win7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), take a screenshot before the test finished.
LinX 0.6.4 (11.0.1.005) - set memory to "ALL" preset
LinX 0.6.4 (11.0.3.008) - set memory to "ALL" preset
Intel BurnTest 2.54 (11.0.1.005)
Intel BurnTest 2.54 Linpack (11.0.3.008)
Prime95 27.9 Build 1 X64
Prime95 27.9 Build 1 X86
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 31 2012, 08:59 AM)
Open RealTemp
Execute Task Manager > Performance tab
Launch Prime95 27.7
Choose custom, min FFT 128k, mem to use (see task manager for available mem)
Start stressing
Monitor the max temp make sure it doesn't exceed 105C (TJmax) - speed will go down (throttled) if TJmax is hit to protect the CPU from overheating
Stress it for 3 hours +
Don't stop priming & open CPU-Z
Take screenshot including Prime95 + CPU-Z + Task Manager + RealTemp
*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


QUOTE(eXnikaru @ Apr 26 2013, 04:18 PM)
some tips for sandy bridge user..
U all can test the system stability in shorter time with prime95..
Just select custom and test with
1344fft 1344fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins
If can passed the test u can test with 1792fft 1792fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins too..

If passed 2 tests on certain vcore..then your system should stable for 12hours prime95 blend test.

the 1344 and 1792 fft is the extremely hard and best test for sb`stability

Normally,if your system is unstable..one of the workers in prime95 will stop/BSOD will happen within 10mins of both test
*
Benchmark Tools:
SuperPI Mod XS 1.5
HyperPI 0.99 Beta
AIDA64 2.85.2400
Cinebench 11.5
wprime 2.09
pifast
maxxmem
AquaMark 3.1

BSOD codes for overclocking
QUOTE
0x101 = increase vcore
0x124 = increase/decrease vcore or QPI/VTT... have to test to see which one it is
0x0A = unstable RAM/IMC, increase QPI first, if that doesn't work increase vcore
0x1E = increase vcore
0x3B = increase vcore
0x3D = increase vcore
0xD1 = QPI/VTT, increase/decrease as necessary, can also be unstable Ram, raise Ram voltage
0x9C = QPI/VTT most likely, but increasing vcore has helped in some instances
0x50 = RAM timings/Frequency or uncore multi unstable, increase RAM voltage or adjust QPI/VTT, or lower uncore if you're higher than 2x
0x109 = Not enough or too Much memory voltage
0x116 = Low IOH (NB) voltage, GPU issue (most common when running multi-GPU/overclocking GPU)
0x7E = Corrupted OS file, possibly from overclocking. Run sfc /scannow and chkdsk /r


This post has been edited by owikh84: May 8 2013, 06:28 PM
TSowikh84
post Aug 14 2012, 12:52 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



LYN Sandy Bridge Owners:

## to be listed you must post at least a screenshot of CPU-Z consisted of CPU & motherboard tabs.

Username | CPU | Highest OC | Motherboard | Cooling

1) owikh84 | 2600K | 5.6GHz (2C/2T) | Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z | Water
owikh84 | 2600K | 5.0GHz (4C/8T) | Gigabyte P67A-UD7 | Water

2) unequalteck | 2500K | 4.5GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8Z77-M | Air
unequalteck | 2500K | 5.0GHz (4C/T) | Asus P8P67 Deluxe Rev3 | Water

3) sniper69 | 2600K | 4.8GHz (4C/8T) | Asus P8Z68V Pro | Air

4) hackcremo | 2700K | 4.5GHz (4C/8T) | Asus P8P67 Pro | Air

5) Qavs | 2600K | 4.8GHz (4C/8T) | Asus P8Z77-V Pro | Water

6) lengchai86 | 2700K | 5.05GHz (4C/8T) | MSI Z68A-GD80 | Water

7) hhoong | 2500K | 4.5GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8Z77-M | Air

8) tanghm | 2600K | 4.6GHz (4C/8T) | Asus P8Z68-V | Water

9) Mrkroit | 2600K | 4.8GHz (4C/8T) | Asus P8Z67-LE | Cooling?

10) .gaban. | 2600K | 5.0GHz (4C/8T) | Motherboard? | Cooling?

11) amadzack | 2600K | 4.8GHz (4C/8T) | Asrock Z77 Fatal1ty Professional | Air

12) toytoybuysell | 2500K | 4.327GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8Z68-V PRO | Cooling?

13) Kaya Tan | i7 2700k ES | 4.8GHz (4C/8T) | Asrock P67 Extreme 4 | Air

14) DunkyKung | i5 2550K | 4.5GHz (4C/4T) | ASROck Z77 Extreme4 | Air

15) torino | i5 2500K | 4.6GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8Z77-M | Air

16) kherel77 | i5 2550K | 4.5GHz (4C/4T) | MSI Z77MA-G45 | Cooling?

17) scriptkiddo | i5 2500K | 4.6GHz (4C/4T) | Asus Sabertooth P67 | Water

18) Mr_47 | i5 2500K | 5.0GHz (4C/4T) | ASRock Z68 Pro Gen3 | Air

This post has been edited by owikh84: May 29 2013, 04:02 PM
TSowikh84
post Aug 14 2012, 12:53 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



Reserved for future updates...
unequalteck
post Aug 15 2012, 11:49 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


i thought SB oc was dead. btw, add me into the list smile.gif
2500K | 4.5Ghz | Asus p8z77-m | Coolermaster v6GT

question here, do u guys keep ur speed at OCed speed for 24/7 usage?
the electricity bill will very expensive doh.gif
TSowikh84
post Aug 16 2012, 12:08 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Aug 15 2012, 11:49 PM)
i thought SB oc was dead. btw, add me into the list smile.gif
2500K | 4.5Ghz | Asus p8z77-m | Coolermaster v6GT

question here, do u guys keep ur speed at OCed speed for 24/7 usage?
the electricity bill will very expensive doh.gif
*

Added smile.gif
No point to run stress test if not for 24/7 so I kept my 2600K @ 5GHz all the time.
Main purpose is to make games gain more FPS and other CPU intensive stuffs.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Aug 16 2012, 12:10 AM
unequalteck
post Aug 16 2012, 01:02 AM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 16 2012, 12:08 AM)
Added smile.gif
No point to run stress test if not for 24/7 so I kept my 2600K @ 5GHz all the time.
Main purpose is to make games gain more FPS and other CPU intensive stuffs.
*
i see, but if i keep it at stock speed, vcore around 1.1x
but if i put at 4.5ghz, the vcore will fixed at 1.37v or depend on my usage?
if 3.3ghz vs 4.5ghz at idle, the electricity comsumption will be the same?
TSowikh84
post Aug 16 2012, 06:24 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Aug 16 2012, 01:02 AM)
i see, but if i keep it at stock speed, vcore around 1.1x
but if i put at 4.5ghz, the vcore will fixed at 1.37v or depend on my usage?
if 3.3ghz vs 4.5ghz at idle, the electricity comsumption will be the same?
*

3.3 vs 4.5, there would be a difference in terms of power consumption even during idle.

unequalteck
post Aug 16 2012, 12:50 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 16 2012, 06:24 AM)
3.3 vs 4.5, there would be a difference in terms of power consumption even during idle.
*
sigh, then maybe need to go back to stock speed, electricity bill too high doh.gif
after i update my bios everything back to default, and i realized that the vcore for stock speed is lower already.
since new bios provide more stability, do i need to lower the vcore and run stress test again for the OCed speed?
TSowikh84
post Aug 16 2012, 01:05 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Aug 16 2012, 12:50 PM)
sigh, then maybe need to go back to stock speed, electricity bill too high doh.gif
after i update my bios everything back to default, and i realized that the vcore for stock speed is lower already.
since new bios provide more stability, do i need to lower the vcore and run stress test again for the OCed speed?
*

The new bios might need higher vCore also.
So no such thing when you see stock vCore is lower your OC vcore will get lower that's not true. But best if you could retest.
unequalteck
post Aug 16 2012, 04:01 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 16 2012, 01:05 PM)
The new bios might need higher vCore also.
So no such thing when you see stock vCore is lower your OC vcore will get lower that's not true. But best if you could retest.
*
okay thanks smile.gif
TingTong123
post Aug 28 2012, 05:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


hi i got a question.
i just reapply tim using mx4
using 212 + push fan only
without oc
my i5 2500k temp is already reaching
58 62 62 56

is it because i apply the tim wrongly?

currently i only tighten my ram and my ram volt is 1.355

pic as at spoiler

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TSowikh84
post Aug 28 2012, 06:01 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(TingTong123 @ Aug 28 2012, 05:35 PM)
hi i got a question.
i just reapply tim using mx4
using 212 + push fan only
without oc
my i5 2500k temp is already reaching
58 62 62 56

is it because i apply the tim wrongly?

currently i only tighten my ram and my ram volt is 1.355

pic as at spoiler

*
This is OC thread
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TingTong123
post Aug 28 2012, 06:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 28 2012, 06:01 PM)
This is OC thread
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
notworthy.gif thank you
i will post the oc result later brows.gif

last time i oc my proc to 4.3
with 1.285 vcore
the max temp is at 64-68

so any other thoughts?

icon_question.gif
TSowikh84
post Aug 28 2012, 06:19 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(TingTong123 @ Aug 28 2012, 06:12 PM)
notworthy.gif  thank you
i will post the oc result later  brows.gif

last time i oc my proc to 4.3
with 1.285 vcore
the max temp is at 64-68

so any other thoughts?

icon_question.gif
*

Looks good bro. As long as you keep it below 98C would be fine. smile.gif best is below 80C.

TingTong123
post Aug 28 2012, 06:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Jun 2009


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Aug 28 2012, 06:19 PM)
Looks good bro. As long as you keep it below 98C would be fine. smile.gif best is below 80C.
*
very helpful
thanks bro! thumbup.gif
noname_lah86
post Sep 10 2012, 02:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: May 2009
Hello sifus, still a beginner at OC, I have some question regarding my OC i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz.

Using MSI P67A-GD65, I set 1.3V Vcore at the bios, and the bottom shows that it is running at 1.28v. However once boot into the Windows, CPUZ show me Core VID of 1.376v, but AIDA CPUID do show the same 1.28v.

During prime95, CPUz shows 1.381v and AIDA shows 1.271v.

Which value show i trust?

This post has been edited by noname_lah86: Sep 10 2012, 02:21 AM
TSowikh84
post Sep 10 2012, 07:18 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(noname_lah86 @ Sep 10 2012, 02:19 AM)
Hello sifus, still a beginner at OC, I have some question regarding my OC i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz.

Using MSI P67A-GD65, I set 1.3V Vcore at the bios, and the bottom shows that it is running at 1.28v. However once boot into the Windows, CPUZ show me Core VID of 1.376v, but AIDA CPUID do show the same 1.28v.

During prime95, CPUz shows 1.381v and AIDA shows 1.271v.

Which value show i trust?
*
CPU-Z or CoreTemp? CPU-Z will show vCore, not VID.
VID is different from vCore. VID, is essentially the amount of power required to get it going. Vcore is the voltage that the CPU is running at.
What's your vdroop control set in BIOS? FYI, vCore set in BIOS will not be the same as those readings on CPU-Z & AIDA due to vdroop/vdrop. You might wanna google for more infos on that.
Some screenshots might help on your problem.
stasio
post Sep 10 2012, 01:50 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
^^
Be sure in cpuz.ini file Sensor=1.......Core Voltage.
Sensor=0.........Core VID.

To be sure run this portable CPU-Z :
http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/software...s/cpuz_1614.zip

noname_lah86
post Sep 10 2012, 05:26 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 10 2012, 07:18 AM)
CPU-Z or CoreTemp? CPU-Z will show vCore, not VID.
VID is different from vCore. VID, is essentially the amount of power required to get it going. Vcore is the voltage that the CPU is running at.
What's your vdroop control set in BIOS? FYI, vCore set in BIOS will not be the same as those readings on CPU-Z & AIDA due to vdroop/vdrop. You might wanna google for more infos on that.
Some screenshots might help on your problem.
*
My Vdroop in bios is high. I will be using AIDA CPUz as my references now since I changed the cpuz.ini to display VID.

Attached Image

Been increase my Core voltage in bios from 1.3 to 1.325 currently. Still finding a stable voltage for my 4.5Ghz.
Do I have to worry about VID readings too in my OC ? Or I can just ignore it and only pay attention to the Vcore and temperature?

Is my temperature doing fine ? I do suspect that my heatsink is not installed so probably and thus result a high temperature.



QUOTE(stasio @ Sep 10 2012, 01:50 PM)
^^
Be sure in cpuz.ini file Sensor=1.......Core Voltage.
Sensor=0.........Core VID.

To be sure run this portable CPU-Z :
http://www.cpuid.com/medias/files/software...s/cpuz_1614.zip
*
I think i know the problem. Since my CPUz cannot be run together with AIDA, I did changed the sensor=0 in cpuz.ini. And thats why i mixed up with the default Core voltage reading.

This post has been edited by noname_lah86: Sep 10 2012, 05:31 PM
TSowikh84
post Sep 10 2012, 05:53 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



I'd pay attention on the vCore, since it's used in the BIOS.
VID is useful for chip binning. smile.gif
Your temps look fine.
stasio
post Sep 10 2012, 06:32 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
QUOTE(noname_lah86 @ Sep 10 2012, 05:26 PM)

I think i know the problem. Since my CPUz cannot be run together with AIDA, I did changed the sensor=0 in cpuz.ini. And thats why i mixed up with the default Core voltage reading.
biggrin.gif
Why AIDA64 and CPU-Z cann't run together? hmm.gif
No conflict beetwen any of monitoring software,only AISuite with some.

noname_lah86
post Sep 10 2012, 06:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
146 posts

Joined: May 2009
QUOTE(stasio @ Sep 10 2012, 06:32 PM)
biggrin.gif
Why AIDA64 and CPU-Z cann't run together?  hmm.gif
No conflict beetwen any of monitoring software,only AISuite with some.
*
I have absolutely no idea lol. But I did google up similar problem and it did solved my the problem.

http://forums.aida64.com/index.php?/topic/...r-18-installed/

QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 10 2012, 05:53 PM)
I'd pay attention on the vCore, since it's used in the BIOS.
VID is useful for chip binning. smile.gif
Your temps look fine.
*
Okie. I will be ignore VID for now.

How about Vdrop high vs low ? Which is a better option to choose from ?


This post has been edited by noname_lah86: Sep 10 2012, 06:49 PM
TSowikh84
post Sep 10 2012, 07:06 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(noname_lah86 @ Sep 10 2012, 06:46 PM)
I have absolutely no idea lol. But I did google up similar problem and it did solved my the problem.

http://forums.aida64.com/index.php?/topic/...r-18-installed/
Okie. I will be ignore VID for now.

How about Vdrop high vs low ? Which is a better option to choose from ?
*
High vdroop is be the best.
I'm not sure where MSI has fix their broken vdroop but the latest BIOS claimed to have improved vdroop control.
stasio
post Sep 10 2012, 09:29 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
QUOTE(noname_lah86 @ Sep 10 2012, 06:46 PM)
I have absolutely no idea lol. But I did google up similar problem and it did solved my the problem.

http://forums.aida64.com/index.php?/topic/...r-18-installed/
OMG ,but this had been 1year+ ago,haha. shocking.gif
amadzack
post Sep 13 2012, 10:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
61 posts

Joined: Oct 2010


Renew SB theread happy.gif
bro can you add me to the list?
2600K | 4.8Ghz (4C/8T) | Asrock Z77 Fatal1ty Professional | Air
rudolfjie
post Sep 17 2012, 02:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
350 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


Has been using 2500K @4.5ghz more than half years (prime95 tested), so far never face any BSOD 000124.
But recently when I convert some video, I encounter few times of 000124. So I increase my offset from -0.005 to +0.01, and Current CPU Capability from 100% to 110%.seems to be stable now(touch wood)

I'm wonder what's the Current CPU Capability for? should I put 110% or higher?
TSowikh84
post Sep 17 2012, 06:15 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(rudolfjie @ Sep 17 2012, 02:56 PM)
Has been using 2500K @4.5ghz more than half years (prime95 tested), so far never face any BSOD 000124.
But recently when I convert some video, I encounter few times of 000124. So I increase my offset from -0.005 to +0.01, and Current CPU Capability from 100% to 110%.seems to be stable now(touch wood)

I'm wonder what's the Current CPU Capability for? should I put 110% or higher?
*

chip degrading?

QUOTE
All “Current Capability” settings: A setting of 100% on all of these settings should be ample to
overclock processors using conventional cooling methods. If pushing processors using Ln2 or other
sub-zero forms of cooling then increase the current threshold to each voltage rail respectively. A
setting of 140% should ensure OCP does not trip during benchmarks.

Asus MVF OC Guide

This post has been edited by owikh84: Sep 17 2012, 06:16 PM
rudolfjie
post Sep 17 2012, 06:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
350 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 17 2012, 06:15 PM)
chip degrading?
Asus MVF OC Guide
*
Thanks for the info, very useful.
I Think might be degrading, will do some test tonight and find a stable setting
toytoybuysell
post Sep 23 2012, 10:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
128 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
1st time OC with OC Tuner

Attached Image
primaroti
post Oct 3 2012, 12:38 PM

Mess With Me Die Like Rest
*******
Senior Member
3,706 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Taiping


anyone who already OC 2500k with stock cooler??? can share any info with me??
Kaya Tan
post Oct 4 2012, 08:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
update my one
Kaya Tan | i7 2700k ES | 4.8Ghz | Asrock P67 Extreme 4 | Air
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2530728
CyntrixTech
post Oct 4 2012, 09:17 PM

Distributor
*******
Senior Member
2,583 posts

Joined: Sep 2011
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 10 2012, 07:06 PM)
High vdroop is be the best.
I'm not sure where MSI has fix their broken vdroop but the latest BIOS claimed to have improved vdroop control.
*
Will check it out on the next M Power build. The only funny thing that I observed is that BCLK isn't as stable as Asus. Or perhaps they deliberately bump it up a wee bit to avoid drop instead. Anyhow, didn't get a chance to actually play with the board much. The bios is a new learning curve. Even more confusing than ASRock and Zotac
azurakun
post Oct 21 2012, 04:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
31 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
Hi all,

i'd like to ask if anyone of you ever try to OC i5 2500k with gtx560Ti. My PSU is only 500W (FSP Hexa). Im wondering if its okay to OC my Proc to 3++GHz or max 5GHz. With OC feature of MSI P67A-GD55 has, Im still a little bit afraid to try coz i might blow up something in the process biggrin.gif
unequalteck
post Oct 21 2012, 05:30 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(azurakun @ Oct 21 2012, 04:49 PM)
Hi all,

i'd like to ask if anyone of you ever try to OC i5 2500k with gtx560Ti. My PSU is only 500W (FSP Hexa). Im wondering if its okay to OC my Proc to 3++GHz or max 5GHz. With OC feature of MSI P67A-GD55 has, Im still a little bit afraid to try coz i might blow up something in the process biggrin.gif
*
im using 2500k with 6790 previously, gigabyte powerock 500w, still manage to work on 4.5ghz. but 5ghz i not sure, maybe u need water cooling as well
Rev pc
post Nov 17 2012, 05:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Nov 2012
From: Wangsa Maju/Taman Melawati


hello, which motherboard it the best between

asus p8z77-v pro
asus p8z8-v deluxe/gen3
msi z77 bigbang mpower

im using i5 2500k
Dennos
post Nov 17 2012, 05:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



asus p8z77-v pro
tineagle
post Nov 19 2012, 11:18 PM

The Animal Within
******
Senior Member
1,276 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: PJ


QUOTE(azurakun @ Oct 21 2012, 04:49 PM)
Hi all,

i'd like to ask if anyone of you ever try to OC i5 2500k with gtx560Ti. My PSU is only 500W (FSP Hexa). Im wondering if its okay to OC my Proc to 3++GHz or max 5GHz. With OC feature of MSI P67A-GD55 has, Im still a little bit afraid to try coz i might blow up something in the process biggrin.gif
*
you can prolly get away with 4.3Ghz easy with aftermarket air cooling. I wouldnt push past that without water cooling and a larger PSU..

i've been running 2500k @ 4.3Ghz(CM hyper TX3 fan) and 6950(unlocked)@880Mhz/1350Mhz for a year on a corsair GS600 smooth breeezy biggrin.gif
unequalteck
post Dec 13 2012, 10:24 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


what should i set for the LLC?
TSowikh84
post Dec 13 2012, 11:00 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Dec 13 2012, 10:24 PM)
what should i set for the LLC?
*

For Asus, Very High level provide the least vdroop so that's the best LLC you should take.

unequalteck
post Dec 13 2012, 11:08 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 13 2012, 11:00 PM)
For Asus, Very High level provide the least vdroop so that's the best LLC you should take.
*
these are my setting. is it good to go? anything too over or under?
Attached Image Attached Image

higher LLC require lower vcore, but why power saving will be lesser?
TSowikh84
post Dec 14 2012, 06:40 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Dec 13 2012, 11:08 PM)
these are my setting. is it good to go? anything too over or under?
higher LLC require lower vcore, but why power saving will be lesser?
*

Your voltages looks fine. Pretty much all stock volts.
But i don't understand your 2nd question rclxub.gif


unequalteck
post Dec 14 2012, 12:46 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 14 2012, 06:40 AM)
Your voltages looks fine. Pretty much all stock volts.
But i don't understand your 2nd question  rclxub.gif
*
lol sorry, forget about it.
so the LLC should set to ultra high? previously i set it as auto then it automatically ultra high
and how about the CPU Current Capabilities?
TSowikh84
post Dec 14 2012, 03:22 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Dec 14 2012, 12:46 PM)
lol sorry, forget about it.
so the LLC should set to ultra high? previously i set it as auto then it automatically ultra high
and how about the CPU Current Capabilities?
*
LLC Very High is recommended by Asus themselves.
Auto = Very High, so any selection also will give the same result.

QUOTE
5. Select Loadline Calibration, Select Ultra High this value will provide overall the closest load level of voltage to the value defined in the bios or AiSuite II

Asus P67/Z68 OC Guide - posted in Post #1

QUOTE
All “Current Capability” settings: A setting of 100% on all of these settings should be ample to overclock processors using conventional cooling methods. If pushing processors using Ln2 or other sub-zero forms of cooling then increase the current threshold to each voltage rail respectively. A setting of 140% should ensure OCP does not trip during benchmarks.

Asus MVF/E OC Guide

This post has been edited by owikh84: Dec 14 2012, 03:25 PM
unequalteck
post Dec 14 2012, 03:31 PM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 14 2012, 03:22 PM)
LLC Very High is recommended by Asus themselves.
Auto = Very High, so any selection also will give the same result.
Asus P67/Z68 OC Guide - posted in Post #1
Asus MVF/E OC Guide
*
yup i read that also, need to clarify it smile.gif
btw, thanks man for replying fast!
DunkyKung
post Jan 1 2013, 11:57 PM

~im dead sexxay~
*****
Senior Member
826 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: around kaybee



hello guys, i just upgraded my system to intel, now im into overclocking,slowly learning here smile.gif

put that aside, i just wanna some clarification, why my proc which is i52550k voltage very high on offset mode?at 4.0ghz its 1.38v already..i tried manual voltage, it run stable on 1.2v @4ghz..proc or mobo prob? im using asrock z77 extreme 4..using manual OC, proc stay 4ghz no matter what condition, idle or load..pls enlighten me, as this is a new world for me..

edit/add info
and, why my proc idle temp is so high?using cm212evo with 2 fan, idle around 35-40, load around 55-60..these temp on stock clock which is 3.4~3.8(turbo).. sweat.gif

This post has been edited by DunkyKung: Jan 2 2013, 12:07 AM
TSowikh84
post Jan 2 2013, 11:14 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(DunkyKung @ Jan 1 2013, 11:57 PM)
hello guys, i just upgraded my system to intel, now im into overclocking,slowly learning here smile.gif

put that aside, i just wanna some clarification, why my proc which is i52550k voltage very high on offset mode?at 4.0ghz its 1.38v already..i tried manual voltage, it run stable on 1.2v @4ghz..proc or mobo prob? im using asrock z77 extreme 4..using manual OC, proc stay 4ghz no matter what condition, idle or load..pls enlighten me, as this is a new world for me..

edit/add info
and, why my proc idle temp is so high?using cm212evo with 2 fan, idle around 35-40, load around 55-60..these temp on stock clock which is 3.4~3.8(turbo).. sweat.gif
*

Offset mode is ultimately depends on the VID of the chip. Every CPU has different VID. It is also depends on what level of offset you set in BIOS, +0.05, -0.05, +0.1 etc which will tell how the chip will behave under load/idle.

Manual voltage on the other hand, will override VID, thus what vCore is set in BIOS + LLC is what you get in the OS. If you feel that manual voltage could give you better vCore then just use the manual mode. I myself, like most people out there prefer to OC with manual voltage. More comfortable. nod.gif

If you don't want to see CPU clock @ 4.0GHz all the time, enable the SpeedStep (EIST), C1E, C3, C6 in CPU configurations in BIOS. In Windows, go to Power Management settings, change to Balanced or Power Saver plan, instead of High Performance.


Added on January 2, 2013, 11:17 amYour temps look quite normal if you're in an non-airconditioned room. Besides that, it depends on the air flow inside your casing as well. You might wanna remount the CPU cooler and reapply with a better TIM like Arctic MX-4, Tuniq TX-2, etc. Just to name a few.

This post has been edited by owikh84: Jan 2 2013, 11:17 AM
DunkyKung
post Jan 2 2013, 06:51 PM

~im dead sexxay~
*****
Senior Member
826 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: around kaybee



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 2 2013, 11:14 AM)
Offset mode is ultimately depends on the VID of the chip. Every CPU has different VID. It is also depends on what level of offset you set in BIOS, +0.05, -0.05, +0.1 etc which will tell how the chip will behave under load/idle.

Manual voltage on the other hand, will override VID, thus what vCore is set in BIOS + LLC is what you get in the OS. If you feel that manual voltage could give you better vCore then just use the manual mode. I myself, like most people out there prefer to OC with manual voltage. More comfortable. nod.gif

If you don't want to see CPU clock @ 4.0GHz all the time, enable the SpeedStep (EIST), C1E, C3, C6 in CPU configurations in BIOS. In Windows, go to Power Management settings, change to Balanced or Power Saver plan, instead of High Performance.


Added on January 2, 2013, 11:17 amYour temps look quite normal if you're in an non-airconditioned room. Besides that, it depends on the air flow inside your casing as well. You might wanna remount the CPU cooler and reapply with a better TIM like Arctic MX-4, Tuniq TX-2, etc. Just to name a few.
*
ok,here is the latest oc ive done, hwmonitor and coretemp showing different cpu voltage..which one should i trust? rclxub.gif this is on offset mode +0.005v with additional turbo voltage at +0.004v..and the temp is so hot @4.5ghz..im not planning 24/7 on this speed, just wanna see how far this proc could go with minimal voltage added..

Attached Image

btw, according to intel, 2nd gen i5 which is sandy bridge only support ram up to 1333mhz @1.5 volt, is there any downside if i use xmp profile which is 1600mhz @1.65v?

update:now im on offset mode -0.005v, temp is much better, but i dont know about stability on idle
Attached Image

This post has been edited by DunkyKung: Jan 2 2013, 07:23 PM
TSowikh84
post Jan 2 2013, 07:45 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(DunkyKung @ Jan 2 2013, 06:51 PM)
ok,here is the latest oc ive done, hwmonitor and coretemp showing different cpu voltage..which one should i trust? rclxub.gif this is on offset mode +0.005v with additional turbo voltage at +0.004v..and the temp is so hot @4.5ghz..im not planning 24/7 on this speed, just wanna see how far this proc could go with minimal voltage added..

btw, according to intel, 2nd gen i5 which is sandy bridge only support ram up to 1333mhz @1.5 volt, is there any downside if i use xmp profile which is 1600mhz @1.65v?

update:now im on offset mode -0.005v, temp is much better, but i dont know about stability on idle
*

HWMonitor shows vCore, whilst CoreTemp shows VID so we would refer to the HWM.

It is fine to run a 1.5v rated RAM at 1.65v. The reason why 1.5v is specified in their specs is because Intel only validate their processors at 1.5v.
DunkyKung
post Jan 2 2013, 07:55 PM

~im dead sexxay~
*****
Senior Member
826 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: around kaybee



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 2 2013, 07:45 PM)
HWMonitor shows vCore, whilst CoreTemp shows VID so we would refer to the HWM.

It is fine to run a 1.5v rated RAM at 1.65v. The reason why 1.5v is specified in their specs is because Intel only validate their processors at 1.5v.
*
i just got a bsod just now, on windows 8 its hard to get the error code, but i manage somehow..its 0x124, and according to u in overclock.net forum, 0x124 = increase/decrease vcore or QPI/VTT . so i think , i need tu bump the offset more..is that right?
TSowikh84
post Jan 2 2013, 08:07 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(DunkyKung @ Jan 2 2013, 07:55 PM)
i just got a bsod just now, on windows 8 its hard to get the error code, but i manage somehow..its 0x124, and according to u in overclock.net forum, 0x124 = increase/decrease vcore or QPI/VTT . so i think , i need tu bump the offset more..is that right?
*

BSOD 124 on this platform is referred to insufficient vCore. Try upping the vCore or offset.
torino
post Jan 24 2013, 11:49 AM

><
*****
Senior Member
978 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
From: Sitiawan, Perak


Not sure whether this is good or not..try to push my 2500k to 4.6Ghz..maybe sifu can give some comments here..


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
kherel77
post Jan 30 2013, 10:57 PM

Noobie
******
Senior Member
1,435 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Blank Space



Is it normal if BCLK not staying at 100. Mine keep moving between 99.7 - 99.8, but never reach 100. I'm leave it at default in bios.
;i5-2550k
;Z77MA-G45

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TSowikh84
post Jan 31 2013, 06:48 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kherel77 @ Jan 30 2013, 10:57 PM)
Is it normal if BCLK not staying at 100. Mine keep moving between 99.7 - 99.8, but never reach 100. I'm leave it at default in bios.
;i5-2550k
;Z77MA-G45
*
It is normally for MSI & Gigabyte boards, there's about 2% variation of BCLK.
I'd just manually set the BCLK to 100.1 or 100.2 in BIOS.
http://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=151146.0
kherel77
post Jan 31 2013, 08:56 AM

Noobie
******
Senior Member
1,435 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Blank Space



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 31 2013, 06:48 AM)
It is normally for MSI & Gigabyte boards, there's about 2% variation of BCLK.
I'd just manually set the BCLK to 100.1 or 100.2 in BIOS.
http://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=151146.0
*
Thanks a lot bro notworthy.gif , i thought something wrong with my chip. Very relieved that doesn't affect anything sweat.gif . Will try adjust manually later...
rulmufc
post Feb 7 2013, 01:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Sabah / Melaka / JB / KL
Hey Guys,

I'm not sure whether this is the right place to ask but since this is OC thread for SB, I might as well ask for help here.
I did OC since I upgraded my system which is Nov 2011, and since that there is no problem until recently. So, here is the problem with my system. Every time I on my system, it will show the page Overclocking Failed. Please enter setup to re-configure your system. Press F1 to run setup. Then I thought my OC problem so I reset it to default which is no more OC but the problem still the same till now. Whenever the OC Failed page show, I need to enter F1 and go Bios, then I just need to discard changes and exit from bios it will boot to windows with no problem. But if I change something and save changes & exit from bios it would not boot to windows and it will shut down the system. One more thing is, every time I restart my system it will shut down the system instead of restarting it. I have to push the power button again to run my system.

I did read some of the solution suggested by any forum that I can find and I did all the solution but still same problem happen. So, I'd like to ask if any of u guys face the same problem or maybe know how to fix this problem. My friend thought maybe the OC chip on MoBo is burn or something, that's why this problem happen.

So guys, please help me fix this problem. Should I send the MoBo for warranty or what? Any help or suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks.

Pic of OC Failed.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

deale30
post Feb 17 2013, 01:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
hi guys..

im using i7 2600K with asrock xtreme4 z77 mobo

my question is

why my CPU ratio the max is 42 only..
and it is ok to put BLCK to 105

TSowikh84
post Feb 17 2013, 02:07 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(rulmufc @ Feb 7 2013, 01:08 PM)
Hey Guys,

I'm not sure whether this is the right place to ask but since this is OC thread for SB, I might as well ask for help here.
I did OC since I upgraded my system which is Nov 2011, and since that there is no problem until recently. So, here is the problem with my system. Every time I on my system, it will show the page Overclocking Failed. Please enter setup to re-configure your system. Press F1 to run setup. Then I thought my OC problem so I reset it to default which is no more OC but the problem still the same till now. Whenever the OC Failed page show, I need to enter F1 and go Bios, then I just need to discard changes and exit from bios it will boot to windows with no problem. But if I change something and save changes & exit from bios it would not boot to windows and it will shut down the system. One more thing is, every time I restart my system it will shut down the system instead of restarting it. I have to push the power button again to run my system.

I did read some of the solution suggested by any forum that I can find and I did all the solution but still same problem happen. So, I'd like to ask if any of u guys face the same problem or maybe know how to fix this problem. My friend thought maybe the OC chip on MoBo is burn or something, that's why this problem happen.

So guys, please help me fix this problem. Should I send the MoBo for warranty or what? Any help or suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks.

Pic of OC Failed.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Sounds like your mobo has a broken BIOS chip which cannot reset to default whenever you attempted to restore.
You might try to flash the BIOS to the latest revision in case if the BIOS is corrupted.
Otherwise, I'd say RMA the board is the best solution.

QUOTE(deale30 @ Feb 17 2013, 01:51 AM)
hi guys..

im using i7 2600K with asrock xtreme4 z77 mobo

my question is

why my CPU ratio the max is 42 only..
and it is ok to put BLCK to 105
*

Sometimes it's hard to answer mobo specific issues. You might try reflash the BIOS to the latest one.
BCLK 105 is fine, as long as your chip is able to do it.



deale30
post Feb 17 2013, 07:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
491 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 17 2013, 02:07 PM)
Sometimes it's hard to answer mobo specific issues. You might try reflash the BIOS to the latest one.
BCLK 105 is fine, as long as your chip is able to do it.
*
thanks bro...

rulmufc
post Feb 18 2013, 11:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
225 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
From: Sabah / Melaka / JB / KL
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 17 2013, 02:07 PM)
Sounds like your mobo has a broken BIOS chip which cannot reset to default whenever you attempted to restore.
You might try to flash the BIOS to the latest revision in case if the BIOS is corrupted.
Otherwise, I'd say RMA the board is the best solution.
*
Hey Bro,

I did flash to the latest BIOS but the problem still there. I've also troubleshoot everything else and there is nothing wrong with my psu, cpu, ram or any other. So, it should be my mobo. I think i will send it for RMA. Thanks for your opinion.
scriptkiddo
post Mar 31 2013, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



Hi guys, i overclocked my 2500K to 4.6Ghz but i am facing some problem when running LinX & Intel Burn Test

RAM Frequency:: 2133Mhz
VCORE:: 1.4
DRAM:: 1.65
others voltages are set to auto

Prime95 Max Temps
In-place FFTs :: 78C(MAX)
Blend Test:: 77-78C(MAX)

LinX test
Problem Size: 30600
Memory : 7168
Run: 20 Times

Intel Burn Test
Time to run :: 20
Stress Level:: Maximum
Threads:: All

i get error 0x101 & 0x124, which if im not mistaken means increase VCORE, but VCORE is already @ 1.4V, isnt it high for a 4.6Ghz OC, i have been keeping this setting for 2 weeks now, no problem until i encountered some lagging issues while playing FIFA, previously it was fine, even at stock setting FIFA runs smoothly. So i tested with LinX & Intel Burn Test, got blue screen redi with 2 types or error codes shocking.gif . Max temps for LinX before blue screen was 82c & 80c for intel burn test. I am really confused with where i am doing it wrongly, guide needed pls notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by scriptkiddo: Mar 31 2013, 02:35 PM
TSowikh84
post Mar 31 2013, 02:33 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Mar 31 2013, 02:12 PM)
Hi guys, i overclocked my 2500K to 4.6Ghz but i am facing some problem when running LinX test

RAM Frequency:: 2133Mhz
VCORE:: 1.4
DRAM:: 1.65
others voltages are set to auto

Prime95 Max Temps
In-place FFTs :: 78C(MAX)
Blend Test:: 77-78C(MAX)

but when i run LinX test
Problem Size: 30600
Memory : 7168
Run: 20 Times

i get blue screen even before the first loop, temps hit to 82C  shocking.gif , i am abit confused weather my OC was a success or failure, need some feedback people, thx sweat.gif
btw i didt encounter any blue screen before this, and is it better to use XMP profile or manual? im current using manual settings for my RAMs.
I have been keeping this settings for 2 weeks and had no problem before. Today while playing FIFA i faced some lagging issues.
The game does not lag even at stock setting, so i was a little astonished and ran LinX and blue screen appeared.
*

What's the code of the BSOD?
I suspect it's related to insufficient vCore. Try upping your vCore slightly.
Good luck

scriptkiddo
post Mar 31 2013, 03:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Mar 31 2013, 03:33 PM)
What's the code of the BSOD?
I suspect it's related to insufficient vCore. Try upping your vCore slightly.
Good luck
*
the code is 0x101 & 0x124, i increased to 1.43V and runned intel burn test
Set:20
Stress Level: High (2048MB)
All Thread.


temps are rocketing to 86c on my CORE 2 bro. How bout PLL voltage its auto currently.
TSowikh84
post Mar 31 2013, 05:30 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Mar 31 2013, 03:13 PM)
the code is 0x101 & 0x124, i increased to 1.43V and runned intel burn test
Set:20
Stress Level: High (2048MB)
All Thread.
temps are rocketing to 86c on my CORE 2 bro. How bout PLL voltage its auto currently.
*
BSOD codes for overclocking

QUOTE
0x101 = increase vcore
0x124 = increase/decrease vcore or QPI/VTT... have to test to see which one it is
0x0A = unstable RAM/IMC, increase QPI first, if that doesn't work increase vcore
0x1E = increase vcore
0x3B = increase vcore
0x3D = increase vcore
0xD1 = QPI/VTT, increase/decrease as necessary, can also be unstable Ram, raise Ram voltage
0x9C = QPI/VTT most likely, but increasing vcore has helped in some instances
0x50 = RAM timings/Frequency or uncore multi unstable, increase RAM voltage or adjust QPI/VTT, or lower uncore if you're higher than 2x
0x109 = Not enough or too Much memory voltage
0x116 = Low IOH (NB) voltage, GPU issue (most common when running multi-GPU/overclocking GPU)
0x7E = Corrupted OS file, possibly from overclocking. Run sfc /scannow and chkdsk /r

Then confirmed it is insufficient vCore. Bump it up until no more BSOD.
LancerGT
post Apr 3 2013, 01:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
hi,i want to ask my i7 2600k with asus p8p67 pro,i try overclocking to 4.5 with vcore 1.27v,but when testing prime 95 cpuz just showing my vcore 1.240 to 1.248,running 2 hours no error,is that stable?should i test longer ?
TSowikh84
post Apr 3 2013, 03:43 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 3 2013, 01:38 PM)
hi,i want to ask my i7 2600k with asus p8p67 pro,i try overclocking to 4.5 with vcore 1.27v,but when testing prime 95 cpuz just showing my vcore 1.240 to 1.248,running 2 hours no error,is that stable?should i test longer ?
*
I will extend it to 3 hours. But of course the longer the run time, the better you can conclude about stability of your settings.

Pls share some screenshots of prime95 and CPU-Z showing clocks, voltage and hardware specs.
LancerGT
post Apr 3 2013, 05:33 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
Ok,I tested with software intel burn test,superpi,cine bench 11.5 with my processor i7 2600k vcore 1.280 all passed, just waiting for prime 95 result.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 5 2013, 07:10 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Mar 31 2013, 06:30 PM)
BSOD codes for overclocking
Then confirmed it is insufficient vCore. Bump it up until no more BSOD.
*
Bro now no BSOD redi, intel burn test results as below:-

Settings:: HIGH
user posted image

Settings:: VERY HIGH
user posted image

i get a stable GFlops for both this test, but for my LinX i get around 60-70 GFlops, is it normal?. In addition i still get some very minor lag while playing FIFA

My Current OC Setting::

user posted image

DRAM Voltage: 1.65v
user posted image

This post has been edited by scriptkiddo: Apr 5 2013, 10:09 PM
TSowikh84
post Apr 6 2013, 12:05 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 5 2013, 07:10 PM)
Bro now no BSOD redi, intel burn test results as below:-

Settings:: HIGH


Settings:: VERY HIGH


i get a stable GFlops for both this test, but for my LinX i get around 60-70 GFlops, is it normal?. In addition i still get some very minor lag while playing FIFA

My Current OC Setting::



DRAM Voltage: 1.65v

*
60-70 GFlops is abnormal. You should get 120+ with 2500K, provided that you are using the LinX posted in post #1 and win7 SP1 onwards.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 6 2013, 02:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 6 2013, 01:05 AM)
60-70 GFlops is abnormal. You should get 120+ with 2500K, provided that you are using the LinX posted in post #1 and win7 SP1 onwards.
*
Ya im using the LinX posted in 1st post with Win7 SP1. Maybe increase Vcore a little more? currently @ 1.425v
TSowikh84
post Apr 6 2013, 08:47 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 6 2013, 02:26 AM)
Ya im using the LinX posted in 1st post with Win7 SP1. Maybe increase Vcore a little more? currently @ 1.425v
*
Your screenshots are too small. Should have cropped them for better view.
Alright after zooming in your VERY HIGH level screen a little bit finally I could see your GFlops was actually started with ~125 then dropped to 60-70+ after a few loops. This shows that you're running at a performance drop, which is abnormal. Let's forget about the HIGH level as it doesn't really show max stress.
So try increasing your vCore slightly and see. There might be a possibility that there is something overheat on your board, that's why the performance is throttled down giving an inconsistent Gflops. You shoud monitor all the related temps with Asus AI Suite or any other temp monitoring app. Your core temps look fine as long as they don't hit TJmax of 98C.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 6 2013, 09:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 6 2013, 09:47 AM)
Your screenshots are too small. Should have cropped them for better view.
Alright after zooming in your VERY HIGH level screen a little bit finally I could see your GFlops was actually started with ~125 then dropped to 60-70+ after a few loops. This shows that you're running at a performance drop, which is abnormal. Let's forget about the HIGH level as it doesn't really show max stress.
So try increasing your vCore slightly and see. There might be a possibility that there is something overheat on your board, that's why the performance is throttled down giving an inconsistent Gflops. You shoud monitor all the related temps with Asus AI Suite or any other temp monitoring app. Your core temps look fine as long as they don't hit TJmax of 98C.
*
Sorry for the low resolution screenshots bro my bad doh.gif bro aniway i ran LinX again yesterday increasing Vcore to 1.43. Increased GFlop around 130GF, but dropped again halfway, so i guess i am facing performance drop.
user posted image


I dont get any warnings except for CPU. It always shows up a pop up "CPU 71-74 Centigrade".
This warning is intended for the CPU temps right?. Below is the screenshot showing the warning in ASUS AI Suite

user posted image

performance drop because of high CPU temps?

This post has been edited by scriptkiddo: Apr 6 2013, 10:11 AM
TSowikh84
post Apr 6 2013, 10:25 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 6 2013, 09:56 AM)
Sorry for the low resolution screenshots bro my bad doh.gif  bro aniway i ran LinX again yesterday increasing Vcore to 1.43. Increased GFlop around 130GF, but dropped again halfway, so i guess i am facing performance drop.

I dont get any warnings except for CPU. It always shows up a pop up "CPU 71-74 Centigrade".
This warning is intended for the CPU temps right?. Maybe i will try to run LinX again with the same setting with ASUS AI Suite running, will check if any overheat issues appear.
*
The mobo BIOS and AI Suite always record CPU temp, which is different from core temps. Normally we will pay attention on the core temps as it is related to TJmax. Nothing wrong with the CPU temps reading it works just normal.

What you need to look is at other temps such as mobo especially the VRM area, it tends to get hot at continuous stress. Make sure that your rig has a good air ventilation and flow. So that it doesn't get toasted so easily. From the pics seems like several critical points of your mobo around the CPU are normal. So it must be something else that cause the inconsistent GFlops and performance drop half way.

I could be a RAM issues. Having the GFlops cut to half is like a drop from dual channel to single channel bandwidth. Try running with 2 sticks (modules). Good luck.

scriptkiddo
post Apr 6 2013, 04:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 6 2013, 11:25 AM)
The mobo BIOS and AI Suite always record CPU temp, which is different from core temps. Normally we will pay attention on the core temps as it is related to TJmax. Nothing wrong with the CPU temps reading it works just normal.

What you need to look is at other temps such as mobo especially the VRM area, it tends to get hot at continuous stress. Make sure that your rig has a good air ventilation and flow. So that it doesn't get toasted so easily. From the pics seems like several critical points of your mobo around the CPU are normal. So it must be something else that cause the inconsistent GFlops and performance drop half way.

I could be a RAM issues. Having the GFlops cut to half is like a drop from dual channel to single channel bandwidth. Try running with 2 sticks (modules). Good luck.
*
Sure bro, will do that and get back to you thumbup.gif
LancerGT
post Apr 6 2013, 06:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
hi,i want to ask this is normal for my oc ?i7 2600k vcore 1.272v,tq.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
TSowikh84
post Apr 6 2013, 11:58 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 6 2013, 06:05 PM)
hi,i want to ask this is normal for my oc ?i7 2600k vcore 1.272v,tq.
*
The voltages and temps look fine. But you still have to sellect "ALL" the mem for max stress.
The Gflops can be higher with all other background apps disabled.
LancerGT
post Apr 7 2013, 03:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
Oh I see, thank owikh84,so I can use the voltage all the way?or I should lower?i will test again with all mem.
TSowikh84
post Apr 7 2013, 08:35 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 7 2013, 03:28 AM)
Oh I see, thank owikh84,so I can use the voltage all the way?or I should lower?i will test again with all mem.
*
Try lower vCore, the lowest possible, if stable then you are fine to use it.
The lower the vCore, the lower the temp.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 7 2013, 09:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



Bro Owikh, i upped Vcore abit to 1.435, ran LinX and got a constant GFlop values biggrin.gif

user posted image

so is my OC a pass nw? Btw 1.435 for 24/7 use safe for a 4.6Ghz OC or too high? so far lower Vcore gives lower results in LinX hmm.gif
TSowikh84
post Apr 7 2013, 09:51 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 7 2013, 09:43 AM)
Bro Owikh, i upped Vcore abit to 1.435, ran LinX and got a constant GFlop values  biggrin.gif

so is my OC a pass nw? Btw 1.435 for 24/7 use safe for a 4.6Ghz OC or too high? so far lower Vcore gives lower results in LinX hmm.gif
*
Congratulations bro. Well done on the 130 GFlops! The vCore looks fine for average chip so you would be fine.
You got nice temps too so don't worry it is perfect for 24/7.

scriptkiddo
post Apr 7 2013, 11:03 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 7 2013, 10:51 AM)
Congratulations bro. Well done on the 130 GFlops! The vCore looks fine for average chip so you would be fine.
You got nice temps too so don't worry it is perfect for 24/7.
*
Thx for all the guide Owikh bro without yr advise would be still lost notworthy.gif niway bro still have some idea too push the CPU a little further, not now but maybe in few weeks times. Now planning to really check the stability and if possible further fine tune the settings if possible. Btw bro js a little doubt, if the GFlops are fine will there be any chance of me to face any lag or stutter when playing games? I tried playing borderlands 2, Counter Strike Online, NFS Most Wanted 2012 all fine....but my fifa face some kind of stutter every now and then its been happening recently but can OC have any potential chance to cause any lag? Cause OC is meant to remove the bottleneck we often face right? tongue.gif
LancerGT
post Apr 7 2013, 12:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
hi here the result,my cpu temp max 81,is that hot ?


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
LancerGT
post Apr 7 2013, 12:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
The result for prime95,test completed in 5 hours 49 minutes with vcore 1.272,cpu temp max 82,gskill ram 2133mhz cl9 1.6v,is that pass?


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
mykebo
post Apr 7 2013, 12:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


can use water cooling for better cooling system
LancerGT
post Apr 7 2013, 12:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(mykebo @ Apr 7 2013, 12:35 PM)
can use water cooling for better cooling system
*
Ya but expansive ?
mykebo
post Apr 7 2013, 12:59 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
54 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 7 2013, 11:40 AM)
Ya but expansive ?
*
yup, around 250++, i used H50 corsair, so far so good, i love it
LancerGT
post Apr 7 2013, 02:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(mykebo @ Apr 7 2013, 12:59 PM)
yup, around 250++, i used H50 corsair, so far so good, i love it
*
I'm using thermatake water 2.0 pro with push pull without aircond,I think need go for corsair h100.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 8 2013, 01:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 7 2013, 03:12 PM)
I'm using thermatake water 2.0 pro with push pull without aircond,I think need go for corsair h100.
*
Bro 82c when running stress tests are still fine, as quoted by Owikh bro as long the temps stays below 98c its ok cause during our usage temps are not often pushed to extreme height. For me when gaming my temps are around 68c MAX, and during stress test it reaches around 87c so in your case the temps might be slightly lower during your usage. Another thing is, are you running your Thermaltake 2.0 with Push & Pull fan configuration>

This post has been edited by scriptkiddo: Apr 8 2013, 02:04 AM
LancerGT
post Apr 8 2013, 09:37 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 8 2013, 01:56 AM)
Bro 82c when running stress tests are still fine, as quoted by Owikh bro as long the temps stays below 98c its ok cause during our usage temps are not often pushed to extreme height. For me when gaming my temps are around 68c MAX, and during stress test it reaches around 87c so in your case the temps might be slightly lower during your usage. Another thing is, are you running your Thermaltake 2.0 with Push & Pull fan configuration>
*
Hi scriptkiddo,yes im using Thermaltake 2.0 with Push & Pull fan configuration,my room temp 32c,if i switch on aircond temp will be 72c in full stress.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 8 2013, 12:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 8 2013, 10:37 AM)
Hi scriptkiddo,yes im using Thermaltake 2.0 with Push & Pull fan configuration,my room temp 32c,if i switch on aircond temp will be 72c in full stress.
*
How much the temps will hit if you are stressing without the aircond turned on? Are you planning to increase your OC to higher clocks? For and i7 i see your temps are ok bro
LancerGT
post Apr 8 2013, 02:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 8 2013, 12:40 PM)
How much the temps will hit if you are stressing without the aircond turned on? Are you planning to increase your OC to higher clocks? For and i7 i see your temps are ok bro
*
Without aircond CPU temp full load will be 82c,with aircond around 72,I won't increase my clock any more,just stay 4.5ghz.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 9 2013, 02:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 8 2013, 03:08 PM)
Without aircond CPU temp full load will be 82c,with aircond around 72,I won't increase my clock any more,just stay 4.5ghz.
*
than your fine bro, no problem for your daily usage. Enjoy your speed, This cooler is just fine thumbup.gif plus your aircond is there so confirm will turn on most of the time, chill bro tongue.gif
LancerGT
post Apr 9 2013, 05:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Sep 2009
QUOTE(scriptkiddo @ Apr 9 2013, 02:28 AM)
than your fine bro, no problem for your daily usage. Enjoy your speed, This cooler is just fine  thumbup.gif plus your aircond is there so confirm will turn on most of the time, chill bro tongue.gif
*
Ya that enough for me,thank for your advice.
scriptkiddo
post Apr 10 2013, 02:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
163 posts

Joined: Nov 2008



QUOTE(LancerGT @ Apr 9 2013, 06:20 PM)
Ya that enough for me,thank for your advice.
*
Np bro, have fun cheers icon_rolleyes.gif
kherel77
post Apr 11 2013, 02:15 AM

Noobie
******
Senior Member
1,435 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Blank Space



What is the different between LinX's GFlops & Intel Burn Test's GFlops~? Coz I got different value for both..

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


This post has been edited by kherel77: Apr 11 2013, 02:15 AM
TSowikh84
post Apr 11 2013, 06:52 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kherel77 @ Apr 11 2013, 02:15 AM)
What is the different between LinX's GFlops & Intel Burn Test's GFlops~? Coz I got different value for both..
*
You are supposed to get the same GFlops.
Download the latest LinX from post #1 of this thread & make sure you are running it on win7 SP1 or win8.
kherel77
post Apr 18 2013, 12:21 AM

Noobie
******
Senior Member
1,435 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Blank Space



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Apr 11 2013, 06:52 AM)
You are supposed to get the same GFlops.
Download the latest LinX from post #1 of this thread & make sure you are running it on win7 SP1 or win8.
*
Thanks bro. But I fried my Mushkin RAM while running last LinX attempt doh.gif . Manage to get 106+ GFlops but CPU temp skyrocket until 94++ on 19th round, auto shut-off & can't post anymore. After a few trouble shoot, i found 1 of my RAM spoiled already.... cry.gif Seems Linx is heavier stress than IBT.

New RAM set will be otw, & try to fork-out better cooler this time for my small casing...

This post has been edited by kherel77: Apr 18 2013, 12:22 AM
TSowikh84
post Apr 18 2013, 10:25 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(kherel77 @ Apr 18 2013, 12:21 AM)
Thanks bro. But I fried my Mushkin RAM while running last LinX attempt  doh.gif . Manage to get 106+ GFlops but CPU temp skyrocket until 94++ on 19th round, auto shut-off & can't post anymore. After a few trouble shoot, i found 1 of my RAM spoiled already.... cry.gif Seems Linx is heavier stress than IBT.

New RAM set will be otw, & try to fork-out better cooler this time for my small casing...
*
LinX and IBT are the same programs, they are using linpack libraries (AVX included). Only difference I can think of is that IBT has more preset options and a blinking flame; whereas LinX has an option to set priority.

So, i suspect you are using an older linpack libraries included in the IBT folder.
tshin810
post Apr 21 2013, 11:11 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,256 posts

Joined: Dec 2009

My i5-2500k running @ 4.0ghz for 1 year already, very stable. Never feel need to push more than 4ghz.
unequalteck
post Apr 22 2013, 02:38 AM

Custom member title
*******
Senior Member
2,690 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu Current: Wangsa Maju


| 2500K | 5.0GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8P67 Deluxe Rev 3.0 | Water
user posted image
TSowikh84
post Apr 22 2013, 06:29 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(unequalteck @ Apr 22 2013, 02:38 AM)
| 2500K | 5.0GHz (4C/4T) | Asus P8P67 Deluxe Rev 3.0 | Water

*
Nice try. But you are using the old version of prime95 (without AVX instruction).
The latest version is in Post #1:

Prime95 27.9 Build 1 X64
Prime95 27.9 Build 1 X86

Good luck!
eXnikaru
post Apr 26 2013, 04:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
6 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
some tips for sandy bridge user..
U all can test the system stability in shorter time with prime95..
Just select custom and test with
1344fft 1344fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins
If can passed the test u can test with 1792fft 1792fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins too..

If passed 2 tests on certain vcore..then your system should stable for 12hours prime95 blend test.

the 1344 and 1792 fft is the extremely hard and best test for sb`stability

Normally,if your system is unstable..one of the workers in prime95 will stop/BSOD will happen within 10mins of both test

This post has been edited by eXnikaru: Apr 26 2013, 04:19 PM
TSowikh84
post Apr 26 2013, 06:50 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(eXnikaru @ Apr 26 2013, 04:18 PM)
some tips for sandy bridge user..
U all can test the system stability in shorter time with prime95..
Just select custom and test with
1344fft 1344fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins
If can passed the test u can test with 1792fft 1792fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins too..

If passed 2 tests on certain vcore..then your system should stable for 12hours prime95 blend test.

the 1344 and 1792 fft is the extremely hard and best test for sb`stability

Normally,if your system is unstable..one of the workers in prime95 will stop/BSOD will happen within 10mins of both test
*
Good tips. Thanks for sharing. So, we could cut time a lot now with this method.
TQ
raydenex
post Apr 27 2013, 04:13 PM

"Updated my journal."
****
Senior Member
588 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang | Puchong | Malacca


Does those custom settings work for Ivy too?
hypermax
post Apr 27 2013, 09:50 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
2,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Beneath the starry night


QUOTE(eXnikaru @ Apr 26 2013, 04:18 PM)
some tips for sandy bridge user..
U all can test the system stability in shorter time with prime95..
Just select custom and test with
1344fft 1344fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins
If can passed the test u can test with 1792fft 1792fft 1minute 80-90% available ram for 15mins too..

If passed 2 tests on certain vcore..then your system should stable for 12hours prime95 blend test.

the 1344 and 1792 fft is the extremely hard and best test for sb`stability

Normally,if your system is unstable..one of the workers in prime95 will stop/BSOD will happen within 10mins of both test
*
I would like to know whether this works for IVY or not. But theoretically it should as both share similar architecture albeit different die size.
Mr_47
post May 26 2013, 11:57 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



my 680 oc being unleash from phenom ii x4 925 3.8G to i5 2500K 5Ghz
4.8ghz
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6619175
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/685866
5hz
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/6631765
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/695714

btw:
http://valid.canardpc.com/2814164
user posted image

user posted image



This post has been edited by Mr_47: May 27 2013, 12:16 AM
Mr_47
post May 29 2013, 01:09 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



thread quite dead now? cmon man let bench and pwn haswell...
TSowikh84
post May 29 2013, 02:24 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ May 29 2013, 01:09 PM)
thread quite dead now? cmon man let bench and pwn haswell...
*
You are way too late in the game smile.gif
Welcome to the club.
kherel77
post May 29 2013, 02:26 PM

Noobie
******
Senior Member
1,435 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
From: Blank Space



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ May 29 2013, 01:09 PM)
thread quite dead now? cmon man let bench and pwn haswell...
*
For me is enough with 4.5GHz to run 24hrs F@H... biggrin.gif Summore my MSI board not so good for OC...
Mr_47
post May 29 2013, 02:52 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 29 2013, 02:24 PM)
You are way too late in the game smile.gif
Welcome to the club.
*
haha thx... just got rich lately lol

anyway here is my cooling method,
CM Hyper 212 EVO+CM XtraFlo push+pull+vertical

+ the link to my bench is broken bro

QUOTE(kherel77 @ May 29 2013, 02:26 PM)
For me is enough with 4.5GHz to run 24hrs F@H... biggrin.gif  Summore my MSI board not so good for OC...
*
bro 4.5 is good enough ... smile.gif

This post has been edited by Mr_47: May 29 2013, 02:57 PM
TSowikh84
post May 29 2013, 04:04 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ May 29 2013, 02:52 PM)
haha thx... just got rich lately lol

anyway here is my cooling method,
CM Hyper 212 EVO+CM XtraFlo push+pull+vertical

+ the link to my bench is broken bro
bro 4.5 is good enough ...  smile.gif
*
Fixed. blush.gif
Nice chip you got there.
5.0GHz @ very low vCore on air.
Mr_47
post May 29 2013, 04:13 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 29 2013, 04:04 PM)
Fixed.  blush.gif
Nice chip you got there.
5.0GHz @ very low vCore on air.
*
but still afraid cpu degrade, read a lot bout it hmm keep me thinkin, also tested 4.8 at 1.3v hmm should go for 5 at or not? smile.gif

lucky got a good chip hehe
TSowikh84
post May 29 2013, 04:31 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Mr_47 @ May 29 2013, 04:13 PM)
but still afraid cpu degrade, read a lot bout it hmm keep me thinkin, also tested 4.8 at 1.3v hmm should go for 5 at or not? smile.gif 

lucky got a good chip hehe
*
Yes indeed. Sandy will degrade very fast.
Don't torture it with more than 1.4v and keep the temps below 80C then it would be fine.
Good luck.
Mr_47
post May 29 2013, 04:56 PM

***NOT MODERATOR *** Post : +10,000,000,00 Warn: 100%
*******
Senior Member
4,337 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bora-bora u jelly? Special: Age of multi-monitor



QUOTE(owikh84 @ May 29 2013, 04:31 PM)
Yes indeed. Sandy will degrade very fast.
Don't torture it with more than 1.4v and keep the temps below  80C then it would be fine.
Good luck.
*
thx for the tips mate... will take note on that haha sweat.gif

JoelBubu
post Jul 30 2013, 02:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2012
what people biggrin.gif
well Im new here. here what I got for u guys biggrin.gif
do teach me how to OVER OVERclock mine with this poor rig.
Attached Image
stasio
post Aug 1 2013, 09:45 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
Hey guys, I open "Garage sales" if anybody interested:
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2908375
brows.gif
gsan
post Oct 20 2013, 11:15 AM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

no significant different between noctua d14 default thermal paste vs ic7, on sandy i5 2500k oc to 4.3g @ 1.215v
default
Attached Image

ic7
Attached Image
gsan
post Oct 24 2013, 08:07 PM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

anyone using p8p67 before? do you guys face cold boot issue?
overclockalbert
post Nov 13 2013, 09:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,058 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Penang , Malaysia


i'm using the vanilla P8P67 mobo, and yes it has the cold boot issue.
what i found out was the display card that i used, i using the pci-e power cable that provide by my power supply and the mobo will have issue.
change the pci-e power to molex type (convert molex to pci-e) , the issue gone.
maybe the pci-e lane of this P8P67 mobo is weak or whatever.....
Axell
post Dec 16 2013, 11:14 PM

Looking for FL
*****
Senior Member
920 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Somewhere in Malaysia


Hi all, I'm new to OC and hope can learn more from you guys smile.gif

Currently my cpu running at stock with Noctua NH-D14, is the temperature normal as per screenshot?

user posted image

Found out that my GPU temperature also quite high, idle at 50c sad.gif
TSowikh84
post Dec 17 2013, 06:35 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Axell @ Dec 16 2013, 11:14 PM)
Hi all, I'm new to OC and hope can learn more from you guys smile.gif

Currently my cpu running at stock with Noctua NH-D14, is the temperature normal as per screenshot?

Found out that my GPU temperature also quite high, idle at 50c sad.gif
*
It looks normal.
Axell
post Dec 17 2013, 09:41 AM

Looking for FL
*****
Senior Member
920 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Somewhere in Malaysia


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 17 2013, 06:35 AM)
It looks normal.
*
Thanks owikh84, time for OC learning hehe. Will post my benchmark here if I succeed lol
TSowikh84
post Dec 17 2013, 07:28 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Axell @ Dec 17 2013, 09:41 AM)
Thanks owikh84, time for OC learning hehe. Will post my benchmark here if I succeed lol
*
Overcloking is not that hard if you read the guides in the first post of this thread. biggrin.gif
Good luck! thumbup.gif
Axell
post Dec 23 2013, 03:26 PM

Looking for FL
*****
Senior Member
920 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Somewhere in Malaysia


user posted image

notworthy.gif

This post has been edited by Axell: Dec 23 2013, 03:27 PM
kueckcinx
post Dec 23 2013, 04:16 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
715 posts

Joined: Jun 2012
From: Pahang


wah.. owikh84 damn geng

2600K and Z77 V Deluxe user here !!


Previously was using P67 deluxe, gave my sister ( i5 3470). Such a waste lol .. Dafuq
ijatneda
post Dec 29 2013, 10:29 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


Hi all,
I newbie in i5/i7 overclocking.
Currently using i5 2400 with maximus V gene.
Got question,I already up the multiplier to 36 for all core (31 is stock multipiler)
When I boot into window,initially all core is crank up to 3.6GHz during stressing using prime95.Then after a minutes,all core is drop to 3.1GHz even though there is no error during stressing.
Why ar?
TSowikh84
post Dec 30 2013, 09:13 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Dec 29 2013, 10:29 PM)
Hi all,
I newbie in i5/i7 overclocking.
Currently using i5 2400 with maximus V gene.
Got question,I already up the multiplier to 36 for all core (31 is stock multipiler)
When I boot into window,initially all core is crank up to 3.6GHz during stressing using prime95.Then after a minutes,all core is drop to 3.1GHz even though there is no error during stressing.
Why ar?
*
Overheat? Pls kindly share with us some screenshots of the priming.
ijatneda
post Dec 30 2013, 10:12 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 30 2013, 09:13 PM)
Overheat? Pls kindly share with us some screenshots of the priming.
*
Not overheat since the max temp is 45 worst among 4 core. Didn't capture the priming.later will do that.
ijatneda
post Jan 1 2014, 12:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


Just notice,even with stock setting in BIOS.the frequency only go up to 3.1GHz hmm.gif,which is weird cause it can go up to 3.4GHz.Any comment?
[attachmentid=3794501]

This post has been edited by ijatneda: Jan 1 2014, 12:16 AM
TSowikh84
post Jan 1 2014, 01:24 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Jan 1 2014, 12:12 AM)
Just notice,even with stock setting in BIOS.the frequency only go up to 3.1GHz hmm.gif,which is weird cause it can go up to 3.4GHz.Any comment?
[attachmentid=3794501]
*
I just recalled that it is a 2400 so actually it is normal because 4 cores will run at 3.1GHz.
Turbo @ 3.4GHz will only kick in when you are running single/ dual threaded works.

ijatneda
post Jan 1 2014, 08:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 1 2014, 01:24 AM)
I just recalled that it is a 2400 so actually it is normal because 4 cores will run at 3.1GHz.
Turbo @ 3.4GHz will only kick in when you are running single/ dual threaded works.
*
I see,so if i want it run over 3.4GHz,since the multiplier is up to 38, do i need to disable 2 core?
TSowikh84
post Jan 1 2014, 08:21 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Jan 1 2014, 08:03 AM)
I see,so if i want it run over 3.4GHz,since the multiplier is up to 38, do i need to disable 2 core?
*
You might give it a try but I don't think it's a good idea to disable cores. Not worth it.
donatelo
post Jan 3 2014, 04:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
120 posts

Joined: Jun 2009



i just OC my 2600k too 4.4 Ghz, just to play fsx, z77 asrock extreme 4 user here, if i try 4.5Ghz always BSOD ( clock watchdog timeout) but i satisfy already with 4.4...
ijatneda
post Jan 3 2014, 07:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


just buy apacer ARES 2400 CL11 brows.gif
But my pc can't boot if I select the speed 2400MHz,after adjust to 2133MHz,then can boot. Why ar?If I do not manually select,the speed is 1600MHz stock.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

TSowikh84
post Jan 4 2014, 10:26 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Jan 3 2014, 07:22 PM)
just buy apacer ARES 2400 CL11  brows.gif
But my pc can't boot if I select the speed 2400MHz,after adjust to 2133MHz,then can boot. Why ar?If I do not manually select,the speed is 1600MHz stock.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I think you should enter the RAM timing manually.

Frequency: 2400mhz
Primary timing: 11-12-12-30-2T
Voltage: 1.65V
ijatneda
post Jan 4 2014, 01:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2014, 10:26 AM)
I think you should enter the RAM timing manually.

Frequency: 2400mhz
Primary timing: 11-12-12-30-2T
Voltage: 1.65V
*
When i select the xmp profile,the ram speed is auto.select to 2133MHz.anyway later will try it
ijatneda
post Jan 4 2014, 06:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 4 2014, 10:26 AM)
I think you should enter the RAM timing manually.

Frequency: 2400mhz
Primary timing: 11-12-12-30-2T
Voltage: 1.65V
*
Already try manually enter,PC can't boot cry.gif cry.gif
By the way,if I put max multiplier to 35 for all core, all core can go to 3.5GHz during stress rclxms.gif rclxms.gif .
The voltage is remain at 1.128 during idle and stress,is it cause I manually enter the voltage?
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Back to the RAM question,is it got connection with IMC from the proc?
Official spec from intel memory support is 1333/1066 MHz.

This post has been edited by ijatneda: Jan 4 2014, 06:11 PM
TSowikh84
post Jan 6 2014, 10:08 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Jan 4 2014, 06:10 PM)
Already try manually enter,PC can't boot  cry.gif  cry.gif
By the way,if I put max multiplier to 35 for all core, all core can go to 3.5GHz during stress  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif .
The voltage is remain at 1.128 during idle and stress,is it cause I manually enter the voltage?
Back to the RAM question,is it got connection with IMC from the proc?
Official spec from intel memory support is 1333/1066 MHz.
*
The behaviour of vCore during idle and load either vdroop or vdrop depends on the Load-line Calibration aka LLC set in the BIOS. Very High Level will give a minimal vdroop/vdrop that's why no big fluctuations.

IMC is built in inside the chip so there is a huge connection between them. The Intel's official RAM spec is based on the their test specs ensuring base functionality. Hence, it doesn't mean that you can't use a faster memory kit. But take note that Sandy is capped at 2400MHz.
ijatneda
post Jan 6 2014, 10:34 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 6 2014, 10:08 AM)
The behaviour of vCore during idle and load either vdroop or vdrop depends on the Load-line Calibration aka LLC set in the BIOS. Very High Level will give a minimal vdroop/vdrop that's why no big fluctuations.

IMC is built in inside the chip so there is a huge connection between them. The Intel's official RAM spec is based on the their test specs ensuring base functionality. Hence, it doesn't mean that you can't use a faster memory kit. But take note that Sandy is capped at 2400MHz.
*
You mean, capped at 2400MHz,is it all Sandy Bridge proc capable archive to that speed or only K series proc? hmm.gif
TSowikh84
post Jan 6 2014, 11:38 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(ijatneda @ Jan 6 2014, 10:34 AM)
You mean, capped at 2400MHz,is it all Sandy Bridge proc capable archive to that speed or only K series proc? hmm.gif
*
Oops my bad. I just recalled that SB's IMC can't do 2400MHz altho there's a 2400MHz strap in the BIOS. My highest achievement was 2333.
ijatneda
post Jan 6 2014, 01:42 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
326 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
From: At 4K LCD


QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 6 2014, 11:38 AM)
Oops my bad. I just recalled that SB's IMC can't do 2400MHz altho there's a 2400MHz strap in the BIOS. My highest achievement was 2333.
*
Owh,that explain blush.gif. I thought maybe the ram is faulty or what.
darude87
post May 27 2020, 02:06 PM

hhhoooiii!!!
******
Senior Member
1,412 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


hopefully there are people still can assist me
Just started to OC my 2600K to see if i can reduce the CPU bottleneck for gaming

below is my setup

i7 2600K
Gigabyte P67-UD3-B3
2x4GB Kingston DDR3 1333
Palit 1060 6GB
silverstone 600W bronze
240gb Samsung 860 Sata
3TB WD Red
1TB WD Black
ID-Cooling ZoomFlow 240X

I tried to push to 4.5ghz 1.35Vcore 1.2 QPI/VTT but keep failing intel Burn Test, so i bring it down to 4.3ghz 1.32Vcore 1.1V QPI/VTT.

Able to pass 10 rounds of Intel burn test, but during Prime95, it will freeze and restart after 45 mins to 1h +

any tips on what else i need to tweak on ?

This post has been edited by darude87: May 27 2020, 02:07 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0862sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 04:34 PM