But going to university for your first degree(s) only takes a few years. That's not a long time, as you will find once you attend uni in Australia. It's not like school, where you have to do a linear system of Year 10 and 11 to 12 (or 13) after Years 7 to 9. It's broken down into quick little semesters. Ironically the Aussie lifestyle is typically "laidback" but this system is somewhat "rushed".
ANU and NUS actually offer joint degree programmes in some disciplines. This is not like a private school in Malaysia where you get a degree from a programme that has been "endorsed" or "jointly awarded" by a foreign institution... this is actually being able to attend both schools to study that same programme split between them. On that basis I suppose that ANU and NUS are not that different from an educational standpoint, only in their cultural and geographical individuality. In places like Singapore and Hong Kong it is not unusual to get a lot of Asian (be it East Asian or South Asian) academic and teaching staff, even at the top schools, and this is also the case in Australia depending on the discipline of course. Would that make you feel more "at home"? Certainly not for me. Both schools attract some of the top students in the region (Asia Pacific). Expect competitive peers in the top disciplines (Medicine, Law, Engineering, Economics, Mathematics, Actuarial Science).
Consider also that Singapore is Singapore, the one city. In Australia your experience could vary significantly, and depends on where you choose to relocate to - Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Canberra, Perth, Brisbane etc.
QUOTE(Irzani @ Aug 7 2012, 01:37 PM)
Only Australian National University is better than NUS in the term of ranking. Why not NUS? Can continue to have Asian lifestyle too and can come over into Malaysia anytime he want ..

Actually in the Times rankings Melbourne University is just before Australian National University (#37 and #38, while NUS is at #40). In the QS rankings Melbourne University is not far behind at #31 (ANU at #26, NUS at #28).But we know these rankings are heavily biased towards scientific research publications and citations, and do not really reflect teaching standards or the satisfaction of undergraduate students (which I think is the most important factor).
They are possibly very prejudiced against social sciences and arts. Rankings also have high levels of inaccuracy (schools where specified subjects don't exist being names the top schools in that discipline or subject area is very common).
Aug 7 2012, 12:08 PM
Quote
0.0169sec
1.08
6 queries
GZIP Disabled