Nokia N73

Jcube night w/n808 by nikacu, on Flickr


Car park chinatown w/n808 by nikacu, on Flickr

there are noticeable shakes..gonna need stabilizer for night shot..

off topic, dont continue.

few week ago, i try to learn using lightroom. before that i just looking other people using LR to alter their pic. when i try use myself, i admit pic can be become so beautiful. in my mind thinking, no need buy expensive camera, cheaper one so so only can also do it. when use LR, we dont need more skill and hardwork when realtime shooting, no time waste, many people will give praise, so so lighting also can be nice and other.

some say "why do people have to add ketchup to their fries? Aren't the fries good enough to eat without ketchup"
but sometime i need ketchup in my fries.yummy.

This post has been edited by eidda: Dec 1 2012, 06:41 AM

glad u understand so people today specialist and mastered it so well that they need expensive equipment to do it but in fact they can just buy a cheap 2MP or 5MP camera and do it.

Why spend so much money to show off when u can use LR or PS to do all your ediiting

Photo taken by Samsung Galaxy S3.

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Christmas 2012 Sunway Pyramid by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Christmas 2012 Sunway Pyramid by JTproductions, on Flickr


20121126_215607_3.jpg by JTproductions, on Flickr

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Dec 2 2012, 05:20 PM

+100
i notice alot detail lost after alter.now day maybe people dont care about detail, lot of them like to punch up the color. i also believe my old cameraphone also can do, if they are pro photoshop. using PS@LR all time is something wrong. i dont say PS@LR cant use, but dont use all time.


Bug by Nokia 808PV by eidda808, on Flickr


Flower by Nokia 808PV by eidda808, on Flickr

Wow eidda your 1st pic is very very very nice!!

About the software editing stuff, I got no comments since I nvr really used 1 before.

in other words, anyone who use latest camera phone or any proper camera including DSLR, and used any photo editing software, are either noob, or stupid because of wasting money. if anyone using 2MP to 5MP camera and use editing software, they're forgiven due to the low(?!?) quality camera.

am i right, sifu?

This post has been edited by little ice: Dec 5 2012, 07:12 PM

nope that is you twisting and accuse it back to who present the information above to you. What i am trying to say its by choice.

Photography equipment have many different levels to suit difference needs it depends on the person what type of photography they plan to achieve not twist around because you define any body use editing software are noob or stupid and wasting money that is said by you not me. I only said people can choose to do heavy editing without expensive equipment thats all and still achieve similar result or quality

I have no right to say what is right or wrong i only said its by choice. If you notice those ppl like eidda, nick, Chong Ɇe Vęii and danielmugen they are a few that practice non processing photography notice their creativity and skill keeps getting better compare to those that post processing i guess you know who.

Those that practice non post processing photography you notice their perception and perspective is different compare to those that practice post processing that is the basic knowledge in my opinion someone should gain so when they go to next level of photography they will bring this knowledge along compare to those that cheap camera also edit semi pro camera also edit expensive camera also edit. So they are master of editing.

Here some work from Chong Ɇe Vęii without the needs of post processing. You can check his EXIF no need to hide like some ppl.


Light Painting by F&Fproduction, on Flickr


Sky by F&Fproduction, on Flickr


Little light painting by F&Fproduction, on Flickr


Lightning by F&Fproduction, on Flickr

Those people that are good in photography they will tell you more expensive equipment can achieve certain things normal camera cant and fast lens have its way to capture more accurate moments. Long zoom lens have its pros and cons as well, flashes can do certain things mobile phone cant and raw files gives u more control over your image so like i said it depends on that person. Different level of photography have different level of price tag so it depends how deep your pocket is as well.

Bigger aperture lens with the right body give u better low light performance and certain camera body have better ISO performance so like i said depends?

You are professional i have no right to say you are right or wrong you should advice us.

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Dec 5 2012, 08:26 PM

i'm not interested in the rest of your post so i just quoted what i found interesting, and i've made it straight and clear in my previous post and merely just translating what you said, well, indirectly. it's you who're trying to twist your words and make it sound nicer that it was. choice? yeah. there IS a choice, is to waste money - spend big bucks on camera and big bucks on software when all you need is a cameraphone and skill.

as for personal remarks on you, to be *very* honest, i admire your skill and how you can take such amazing photos so much that it actually motivated me on improving my skill. but, it's the opposite when it comes to your remarks on others who're less good, in great disgust. not surprising, since i'm posting in malaysian forum, such people pop up from time to time and so familiar with it as a malaysian myself. in fact, i thought, how pity it is that you have such a great skill yet with such personality.

enjoy the cameraphone gallery and i shall withdraw from any further discussion ruining the fun since i know i've created plenty of hatred over here.

This post has been edited by little ice: Dec 5 2012, 09:09 PM

My try with my Sony Xperia Acro S. Any helpful comments?


DSC_0080 by Iqbal_kakashi, on Flickr


This post has been edited by Iqbal_kakashi: Dec 6 2012, 12:35 AM

click "share", "grab HTML/BBCode", copy and paste the link here.

Done, Thanks bro.

looks lika face . lol

ip4s

wait for both got ground floor then you can get "GG"

But what is D?

Nokia Lumia 920 OIS and Float Lens in action

Sample 1 - Both shot at ISO 100

Nokia Lumia 920 @ Glass by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Low light by JTproductions, on Flickr



Sample 2 - Both shot at ISO 100

Nokia Lumia 920 @ Low light by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Low light by JTproductions, on Flickr

Sample 3 - Both shot at ISO 100

Nokia Lumia 920 @ Nokia File by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Nokia File by JTproductions, on Flickr



Sample 4 - Both shot at ISO 100

Nokia Lumia 920 @ Low Light shot by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Low light Shot by JTproductions, on Flickr


Sample 5 - Extreme Low light photography

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Extreme Low Light Test by JTproductions, on Flickr


Nokia Lumia 920 @ Extreme Low light by JTproductions, on Flickr


Video OIS in action

Sample 6 - Both shot at ISO 100

Nokia Lumia 920 @ Low light by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ Low Light by JTproductions, on Flickr



Nokia Lumia 920 @ White Colour by JTproductions, on Flickr


Nokia Lumia 920 @ Low Light shot by JTproductions, on Flickr


Nokia Lumia 920 @ Low Light shot by JTproductions, on Flickr

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Dec 7 2012, 07:38 AM

Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ KLCC by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ KLCC by JTproductions, on Flickr


Samsung Galaxy Note 2 @ KLCC by JTproductions, on Flickr