Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Hi-Fi An USB ESS sabre DAC, Simply a performer.

views
     
ClieOS
post Aug 2 2012, 02:22 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


Wow, what a simple design. Never know you can directly mount ES9023 onto USB.
ClieOS
post Aug 2 2012, 10:49 AM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(chchyong89 @ Aug 2 2012, 07:06 AM)
double surface mounting. USB receiver is on the back side.  laugh.gif
Ah, that makes much more sense. For a moment there I thought you put some magic into it laugh.gif
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 01:40 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


user posted image

UD100 next to ODAC.

Surprisingly UD100 measured very well in RMAA, even against ODAC. I think it is safe to say for now, at least for my ears, UD100 is 95% of an ODAC if not more. Really excellent USB DAC for the price.
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 07:41 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


Nothing fancy: PC - (USB DAC) - O2 - Behringer UHA222 for line-in. Didn't use any load for O2 because it doesn't matter in this case. I am just looking for the difference between USB DAC. I would have forgone the O2 if UD100's volume is adjustable on Windows.

For listening, it is PC - USB DAC - O2 - RE0.

This post has been edited by ClieOS: Aug 17 2012, 07:42 PM
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 07:51 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 07:45 PM)
Are you sourcing them with the same PC? Because if you are, you're having ground loops -> hence problematic results.
*
Fortunately, ground loop isn't a problem on my PC. I tried two PC setup before and it doesn't make much difference. Also played with USB isolator before as well.
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 08:02 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 07:55 PM)
Ground loops is not PC dependent. It's when you tie an "extra" ground with the sleeve of the jack when the ground is already shared within the same PC.
To be honest, RMAA is rarely a good gauge of absolute performance. It's very finnicky. I kinda side with nwaguy in RMAA's case.
*
I don't disagree that RMAA isn't the greatest of tools, but it is free. If I have that kind of setup like NvAvGuy, I'll learn how to use them. But till then, RMAA is here to stay. However, the key is to know RMAA limit and know what to look for (and what not to). Even with a bad tool, it can still work if you know how to use it right. Which is why I measure the UD100 against ODAC, which has been well documented. By looking at the difference between result instead of pure number, a lot of things can still be told.

Well, if that fail, I still have my ears and a digital SPL meter to match the volume.
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 08:38 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 08:34 PM)
Tried ARTA yet?
*
Heard of it but never try. I thought it is a shareware, no?
ClieOS
post Aug 17 2012, 08:42 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 08:39 PM)
naw mate.

My senior used it for his FYP.
*
Ok, will try it sometime.


Added on August 17, 2012, 8:46 pmAlright, back to the UD100. I happen to have a few TF card reader collecting dust, so I took one part and see if the UD100 will fit inside. Well, what do you know...

user posted image

user posted image

This post has been edited by ClieOS: Aug 17 2012, 08:47 PM
ClieOS
post Aug 20 2012, 04:22 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Aug 19 2012, 03:31 PM)
like tailor-made housing/casing thumbup.gif

use FiiO E02i Rocky +  UD100 good ah?
I know the mic doesn't work here smile.gif
*
E02i is okay with UD100. But if you are just looking for minimalist setup, E6 would be better choice than E02i.
ClieOS
post Aug 20 2012, 11:06 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(wkkm007 @ Aug 20 2012, 05:23 PM)
+E12 lagi thumbup.gif  ,  UD100 better then E7, how about E10 or E17
*
For DAC alone, I probably prefer UD100 over E10 and E17 right now.
ClieOS
post Sep 5 2012, 10:55 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(zy_xcup @ Sep 5 2012, 10:33 PM)
does it change the sound signature? of the DAC?
*
Not at all.
ClieOS
post Sep 9 2012, 02:30 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


My review of UD100:
http://www.inearmatters.net/2012/09/tiny-d...-of-stoner.html
http://www.head-fi.org/t/626632/tiny-dac-b...s-ud100-vs-odac
ClieOS
post Sep 9 2012, 05:00 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(Pewufod @ Sep 9 2012, 02:42 PM)
so in conclusion it is better than the PCM2704 usb dac that is also naked ?
*
Never listened to that particular USB DAC and thus can't conclude anything from it.
ClieOS
post Oct 2 2013, 11:42 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


My impression of the UD110:

http://www.inearmatters.net/2013/10/impres...ud110-tiny.html
ClieOS
post Aug 27 2014, 08:31 PM

In-Ear Addict
******
Senior Member
1,101 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Mid Johor


QUOTE(suselinuxp @ Aug 27 2014, 04:00 PM)
what is the price for ud120?

can someone make review on ud110v2 vs ud120?
*
Price is USD$69.

They use the same DAC so the overall sound signature is the same. Basically the classic TI house sound for the DAC: warmish, smooth, musical and really good texture over the low to mid range. The difference is that UD120 has better soundstage and clarity over UD110, plus USB async up to 32/384.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0167sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 04:32 PM