Wow, what a simple design. Never know you can directly mount ES9023 onto USB.
Hi-Fi An USB ESS sabre DAC, Simply a performer.
Hi-Fi An USB ESS sabre DAC, Simply a performer.
|
|
Aug 2 2012, 02:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
Wow, what a simple design. Never know you can directly mount ES9023 onto USB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 2 2012, 10:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
QUOTE(chchyong89 @ Aug 2 2012, 07:06 AM) double surface mounting. USB receiver is on the back side. Ah, that makes much more sense. For a moment there I thought you put some magic into it |
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 01:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
![]() UD100 next to ODAC. Surprisingly UD100 measured very well in RMAA, even against ODAC. I think it is safe to say for now, at least for my ears, UD100 is 95% of an ODAC if not more. Really excellent USB DAC for the price. |
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 07:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
Nothing fancy: PC - (USB DAC) - O2 - Behringer UHA222 for line-in. Didn't use any load for O2 because it doesn't matter in this case. I am just looking for the difference between USB DAC. I would have forgone the O2 if UD100's volume is adjustable on Windows.
For listening, it is PC - USB DAC - O2 - RE0. This post has been edited by ClieOS: Aug 17 2012, 07:42 PM |
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 07:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 07:45 PM) Are you sourcing them with the same PC? Because if you are, you're having ground loops -> hence problematic results. Fortunately, ground loop isn't a problem on my PC. I tried two PC setup before and it doesn't make much difference. Also played with USB isolator before as well. |
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 08:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 07:55 PM) Ground loops is not PC dependent. It's when you tie an "extra" ground with the sleeve of the jack when the ground is already shared within the same PC. I don't disagree that RMAA isn't the greatest of tools, but it is free. If I have that kind of setup like NvAvGuy, I'll learn how to use them. But till then, RMAA is here to stay. However, the key is to know RMAA limit and know what to look for (and what not to). Even with a bad tool, it can still work if you know how to use it right. Which is why I measure the UD100 against ODAC, which has been well documented. By looking at the difference between result instead of pure number, a lot of things can still be told.To be honest, RMAA is rarely a good gauge of absolute performance. It's very finnicky. I kinda side with nwaguy in RMAA's case. Well, if that fail, I still have my ears and a digital SPL meter to match the volume. |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Aug 17 2012, 08:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
QUOTE(LittleGhost @ Aug 17 2012, 08:39 PM) Ok, will try it sometime.Added on August 17, 2012, 8:46 pmAlright, back to the UD100. I happen to have a few TF card reader collecting dust, so I took one part and see if the UD100 will fit inside. Well, what do you know... ![]() ![]() This post has been edited by ClieOS: Aug 17 2012, 08:47 PM |
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Aug 20 2012, 11:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 10:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 02:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2012, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2013, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
|
|
|
Aug 27 2014, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,101 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Mid Johor |
QUOTE(suselinuxp @ Aug 27 2014, 04:00 PM) Price is USD$69.They use the same DAC so the overall sound signature is the same. Basically the classic TI house sound for the DAC: warmish, smooth, musical and really good texture over the low to mid range. The difference is that UD120 has better soundstage and clarity over UD110, plus USB async up to 32/384. |
| Change to: | 0.0167sec
0.29
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 04:32 PM |