Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed New Topic New Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Complain against Silverfire, Help me settle guys :(

Share on | Track this topic | Print this topic
availyboy
post Jul 18 2012, 11:07 PM

So Prettay!
*****
Senior Member
786 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 192.168.1.1
I've checked up the results on the internet about the pricing of the lens.
it seems that its more or less RM1000 or so only.
Problem is,the price of the lens for repair is much more than buying a new unit.

I am wondering why TS never really check the package fully before proceeding or notifying.
After 1 month only notify really makes thing kinda .. what you call that too slow to notice,if its still within a week still can do something about it.

Because of that...hmm it's kinda suspicious but i can't judge because i don't know what's the real thing about the lens,probably its the buyer who lost it or the seller who lost it.

But saying used unit is really suffice for the item selling though nod.gif icon_idea.gif
So guys... good luck in solving this problem sweat.gif
availyboy
post Jul 19 2012, 03:27 AM

So Prettay!
*****
Senior Member
786 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 192.168.1.1
QUOTE(sakurakinomoto @ Jul 19 2012, 12:59 AM)

*
QUOTE(0168257061 @ Jul 19 2012, 03:06 AM)

*
That's really some nice clarification,it does really make sense about that.
Maybe TS could really explain the real story about that.
Because within the first month,it should be un-useable so many problem when the repair receipt was shown.
Then how come TS can use for a month without problem? hmm.gif
availyboy
post Jul 19 2012, 08:01 PM

So Prettay!
*****
Senior Member
786 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 192.168.1.1
I am very interested to see how does this goes.
Since it really doesn't make sense looking at the repair receipt there as the lenses dropped before.
Somehow,the shortened version by rangerred makes much more sense,when you really look at it.

@Axell
This argument i thought already passed like few quite post already? Because the current thing about the lens is did TS really dropped it or not? sweat.gif
availyboy
post Jul 20 2012, 12:42 PM

So Prettay!
*****
Senior Member
786 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 192.168.1.1
QUOTE(Izwan898 @ Jul 20 2012, 10:48 AM)
Nikon informed me that the previous owner also refused for repair...
*
Nikon informed you that the previous owner also refused for repair.Surely during quotation,there's a receipt there like you have provided there.
Or something surely can be shown here,as wackyangel requested for the pics of the screws, where was it.

One thing is that,previous owner is from other places maybe,and how come nikon has the information of the previous owner refused to repair?
If there is serial number that can track,please do show out the proof of that cheers.

QUOTE(RainInDecade @ Jul 20 2012, 11:19 AM)
I have a question here,

Is the lens still working right now? As per the quotation report i assume that the lens / item is damaged and clearly not under working condition. If this is the case, then the lens is no longer working starting at the time the lens were sent to the Nikon Center for the first time(Not by TS).

Stick to the upper assumption, can the seller sell it to the TS and TS can use the lens for about a month then only the lens collapsed again?

Another fact, TS stated that the lens was sent to the Nikon service center twice, with the 'same problem' and even almost the same 'quotation price' which is 1.2k, and the first service/repair attempt are rejected, so basically the lens is not usable?

Is there any possibility that the first user repair at somewhere and Nikon Center can't determine it?
*
As said,if it was the same problem that previous owner asked to repair and asked for quotation or stuff.
Shouldn't that the first time,TS received the item,it shouldn't be useable already?
Why after 1 month? That's the question right now sweat.gif

Both side cannot take,but there's always few things missing there doh.gif
availyboy
post Aug 19 2012, 07:29 PM

So Prettay!
*****
Senior Member
786 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: 192.168.1.1
QUOTE(AceCombat @ Aug 19 2012, 05:59 PM)
Safe trader tag is not important one la, mine one I already lost count, without tag also can be a good trader, just depend on how you handle ur case and ur customer.
A successful trader is even without safe trader tag, ur customers also will satisfy on ur price, ur packaging, ur RMA service, ur shipment update, ur chosen courier company and the description of the product and bla bla bla biggrin.gif
This is bulls hit and stupid, Izwan, next time, find me buy thing, I will sell you one faulty item for RM1000 and after you find out only I refund you monthly.
What is this?
INTEREST FREE MONTHLY INSTALLMENT??
*
Ace mei mei xD ...i wonder you still use that name .. LOL
Anyhow you're right ~ ...

Well ts ..good luck with that sweat.gif
« Next Oldest · Dispute Resolution Corner · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0285sec    0.76    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 09:44 PM
All Rights Reserved 2002- 2020 Vijandren Ramadass (~ unite against racism ~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.