Poison that doesn't poison. Electricity that doesn't stun. Fire that doesn't burn.
Is it me or do the 3D graphics in that D3 demo look more spectacular than the actual D3 graphics
Especially the part in the beginning when the barb enters and you see a huge statue on the side and a platform with fountains

Game developers can be 'forced' to rethink their position, to do better and make the game better for all their fans. Take for example, Mass Effect 3.

Mass Effect 3 had very unsatisfactory endings. If you watch this video below, you will notice that ending had lots of glaring plotholes and made no sense overall. In fact, despite fan outcry, Bioware still refused to do anything about the endings.



Enter the Retake Mass Effect 3 initiative. Thousands of fans banded together, to demand a better ending for Mass Effect 3. They held the line, and ultimately, after months of campaigning, Bioware finally gave in, and offered to take a second look at the endings and the result? They released the extended cut DLC for FREE to fans.

Take a look at the same ending now. So much better than the original.

The D3 dev team is probably the most hardheaded about their design choices. Remember that time when they showed D3 for the first time, and fans said that the game was not dark enough/too colorful? And not a single f*** was given.

SC2 dev team was at least willing to listen to fan feedback. The graphics need to be improved? Siege tank model sucked? Hell yeah, we'll do it for the fans!

Nah, D3's color palette wasn't my biggest complaint.

ROFL, you took that from DOTA 2